1Perry
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2011
- Messages
- 7,624
- Reaction score
- 1,859
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Re: Andre Carson: Tea party wants blacks 'hanging on a tree' Read more: http://www.p
Not true. You do NOT have to pass regulation what would allow a company to hire an equally qualified minority. Do you have any idea how far out on the limb you are here? Really, we have to pass laws to allow companies to hire equally qualified minorities? What, was it illegal before?
And if you decide not to?
I can see that we are at the end of the discussion. When you can no longer discuss things honestly, it's time to end. The article states that they used past hiring practices.
It's wrong because they wil NOT allow whites in. It makes no difference if none join, they are NOT allowed to join. They have tried. They have been told "no" you are not black. You know that though but you have no where left to go but with a dishonest arguement.
Ah yes, a Congressional White COngress would be wrong. You are the reason "RACIST" has become a punchline. You make is so obvious that it's not about racism but about politics. That's really, I don't know, there really isn't a word strong enough for that position.
AA doesn't give any special protection for discrimination. All it does is allow companies to hire a member of an under represented group over members of the over represented group if they are equally qualified. But, if a company goes beyond that and discriminates on the basis of race under the banner of AA they can be sued just like anybody else. In fact they are. Constantly. By tea baggers.
Not true. You do NOT have to pass regulation what would allow a company to hire an equally qualified minority. Do you have any idea how far out on the limb you are here? Really, we have to pass laws to allow companies to hire equally qualified minorities? What, was it illegal before?
False. AA says that you can opt to hire a member of an under represented group over a member of an over represented group, but only if they are equally qualified.
And if you decide not to?
Certainly a pattern of discrimination can be brought up, but you can't just show stats that they don't hire enough black people or whatever. That example is about the CEO flat out saying that they discriminate in their hiring. That certainly is admissible.
I can see that we are at the end of the discussion. When you can no longer discuss things honestly, it's time to end. The article states that they used past hiring practices.
Are you serious about this one? You are mad that there aren't white people in the congressional black caucus? Seriously? That has got to be one of the dumbest things to have a hissy fit about I've heard in a while...
It's wrong because they wil NOT allow whites in. It makes no difference if none join, they are NOT allowed to join. They have tried. They have been told "no" you are not black. You know that though but you have no where left to go but with a dishonest arguement.
I assume your issue is the tired old "what would people say if there was a congressional white caucus", right? Well, that argument is obviously silly. 87% of Congress is white. If there are issues of concern to white people, those are being dealt with all the time by the overwhelming majority of Congresspeople. But if there are issues that are only of concern to black people, those aren't necessarily on the radar for the Congress as a whole, so they need a special group to consider them. They aren't parallel at all.
Ah yes, a Congressional White COngress would be wrong. You are the reason "RACIST" has become a punchline. You make is so obvious that it's not about racism but about politics. That's really, I don't know, there really isn't a word strong enough for that position.