- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 93,944
- Reaction score
- 69,025
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
The men who shot and killed her father are more at fault, obviously. Though I'm not sure what "at fault for welfare" means....
Well the person I was responding to said the current welfare (or lack thereof) of the girl is the fault of the ones who shot the dad (the girl is growing up without a dad). But those men were protecting the property. If you're talking about the welfare of the child, who has more direct control of that? Strangers or the parent? The father would not have been shot and killed if he were not engaging in crime. He made the choice to do so, and by doing so threw away concern for this daughter's welfare.
Last edited: