• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rasmussen: Rick Perry now up 11 points on GOP field

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet businesses and people keep moving to TX. How do you explain it?

You voted for Obama without any evidence that he could run the country and we have seen how that is turning out.

Much better than we were under GWB, but certainly there is a long way to go.

Why did you vote for GWClown again?
 
You forgot this one:

AZ: +24.585%

:roll:

Nope, Arizona is a Red state just like TX. I would expect growth there. California keeps having people move to TX, thanks, California, love the taxpayers
 
Much better than we were under GWB, but certainly there is a long way to go.

Why did you vote for GWClown again?

Really? That is what you believe?
Hmmm, net job growth, 4.5 trillion added to GDP, growing labor force-Bush, Obama net job losses, meager GDP growth, declining labor force. Yep, that is a great liberal record.
 
Much better than we were under GWB, but certainly there is a long way to go.

Why did you vote for GWClown again?

Keep bringing up Bush, for you cannot defend the Obama record. Bush isn't on the ballot in 2012, the Obama record is. 38% JAR should tell you how it is going to go.
 
Nope, Arizona is a Red state just like TX. I would expect growth there. California keeps having people move to TX, thanks, California, love the taxpayers

That's not what you said before, of course. :roll:
 
Until you get illegals under control and interject competition, costs aren't going down. Govt. drives up costs as well with regulations. Any idea how long it takes drugs to be approved by the FDA? Free enterprise and competition will always drive down costs.

The # of undocumented residents has gone down, so the costs associated with them should have gone down. And newer drugs cost more so that doesn't increase costs either. Free enterprise is a mythical fantasy that has never existed
 
Keep bringing up Bush, for you cannot defend the Obama record. Bush isn't on the ballot in 2012, the Obama record is. 38% JAR should tell you how it is going to go.

Approval rating is 41% today.
 
NLRB action in South Carolina, Obamacare, and potential for higher business taxes to fund the massive social spending

NLRB in SC didn't decrease business; it merely influenced where production occurred.
Obamacare hasn't increased any costs
The potential of higher business taxes doesn't increase costs when business tax rates have actually gone down





The cost of hiring people and payroll are the largest expense a business has and govt. regulations and taxes drive up those costs.

In many businesses, labor costs are minimal. In the energy sector, labor costs are minimal compared to other costs and taxes are lower than they were under bush*
 
That's not what you said before, of course. :roll:

Is 20% higher than 10%? Enquiring minds want to know. California is the most populous state in the nation with TX being number two. Very close in all areas except job creation, labor force growing, and budget status. I am sure losing taxpayers is a great way to pay off that deficit in California. Still waiting for someone to post the number holding California minimum jobs in California.
 
Yet businesses and people keep moving to TX. How do you explain it?

You voted for Obama without any evidence that he could run the country and we have seen how that is turning out.

Moving businesses from one state to another is not a national solution because it doesnt increase total employment; it just shifts its' location
 
Moving businesses from one state to another is not a national solution because it doesnt increase total employment; it just shifts its' location

What jobs are being relocated to S. Carolina by Boeing? More misinformation from you which you are good at offering.
 
Keep bringing up Bush, for you cannot defend the Obama record. Bush isn't on the ballot in 2012, the Obama record is. 38% JAR should tell you how it is going to go.

Why? As a matter of perspective and to mainly point out your hypocrisy.....that's all.

Oh....and to point out that Perry would probably just be another GWB.
 
Really? That is what you believe?
Hmmm, net job growth, 4.5 trillion added to GDP, growing labor force-Bush, Obama net job losses, meager GDP growth, declining labor force. Yep, that is a great liberal record.

Why don't you address the fact that we were hemorraghing jobs by the thousands under your hero....and yet, now we have jobs being created. Wow...are you living behind the looking glass?
 
Why? As a matter of perspective and to mainly point out your hypocrisy.....that's all.

Oh....and to point out that Perry would probably just be another GWB.

One thing about it, Perry won't be a Barack Obama, there won't be a net job loss under Perry nor 4 trillion added to the debt in 3 years. You must be so proud. How is that Hope and Change working out for you?
 
One thing about it, Perry won't be a Barack Obama, there won't be a net job loss under Perry nor 4 trillion added to the debt in 3 years. You must be so proud. How is that Hope and Change working out for you?

Actually its working fairly well. Not as well as we would like, but certainly better than it was under the previous joke of an administration....and for one thing, Obama has at least restored our integrity as a nation and won't lead us into moral bankruptcy the way that your hero did.

Look at the realm of Foreign policy....one President loved to talk tough, however had no direction.....the other accomplished the goals of the first and we see Freedom rising in countries all around the world....THAT is positive....very positive change.
 
Why don't you address the fact that we were hemorraghing jobs by the thousands under your hero....and yet, now we have jobs being created. Wow...are you living behind the looking glass?

Interesting how you want to judge Bush on his last year, WITH A DEMOCRAT CONGRESS, but won't judge Obama on his 2 1/2 years today. Pretty simple questions for you

Has there been a net job gain since Obama took office?
Are there more jobs available today than when he took office?
Is the misery index today the same or lower than it was when he took office?
Has he halved the deficit like he promised by the end of his first term as promised?
Is the unemployment rate after the stimulus spending 8% or less?
Are the number of discouraged workers less than when he took office?

If the answer is yes to any of those questions and Obama will get my vote
 
Actually its working fairly well. Not as well as we would like, but certainly better than it was under the previous joke of an administration....and for one thing, Obama has at least restored our integrity as a nation and won't lead us into moral bankruptcy the way that your hero did.

Look at the realm of Foreign policy....one President loved to talk tough, however had no direction.....the other accomplished the goals of the first and we see Freedom rising in countries all around the world....THAT is positive....very positive change.

Integrity? LOL, how is that transparency working out for you? How about eliminating lobbyists? I wonder if liberals even know what the word integrity means? Our allies don't seem to like that kind of integrity.

Bet the 25 million unemployed and under Employed Americans don't think things are better but like all liberals it is always all talk and no action. Obama rhetoric trumps the failed results in the liberal world.

Has there been a net job gain since Obama took office?
Are there more jobs available today than when he took office?
Is the misery index today the same or lower than it was when he took office?
Has he halved the deficit like he promised by the end of his first term as promised?
Is the unemployment rate after the stimulus spending 8% or less?
Are the number of discouraged workers less than when he took office?

If the answer is yes to any of those questions and Obama will get my vote
 
That doesn't answer the question but yes there has been a job gain since Perry took office!

That doesn't answer the question but yes unemployment is up since Perry took office!
 
One thing about it, Perry won't be a Barack Obama, there won't be a net job loss under Perry nor 4 trillion added to the debt in 3 years. You must be so proud. How is that Hope and Change working out for you?

How did "get him dead or alive" under bush* work out for you?
 
That doesn't answer the question but yes unemployment is up since Perry took office!

I am waiting for you to show that you know how the unemployment rate is calculated. The answer is yes there have been a net job gain since Perry took office and even after Obama took office as more are employed today than in 2009 in TX. You want to rely on the rate change because of course you know that the rate is up but so are the number employed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom