• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Ever, According to Gallup

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not to worry, Adam, the worst thing that could happen right now would be if Obama was ahead by large margin. This way GOP donors will put their money on Perry. About Texas Governors... Fool me once, shame you, fool me twice shame on me.

Same can be said for Obama supporters who bought the rhetoric and now ignore the record.

Obama economic results in 2011, .4% GDP and 1% GDP growth in 2011, 25+ million unemployed or under employed Americans in 2011, 4 trillion added to the debt in less than 3 years, and a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. Rising Misery index 7.83 to 12.67. First President in U.S. History to have our credit downgraded on his watch! 38-41% JAR and well over 50% disapproval ratings.
 
Not to worry, Adam, the worst thing that could happen right now would be if Obama was ahead by large margin. This way GOP donors will put their money on Perry. About Texas Governors... Fool me once, shame you, fool me twice shame on me.

Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama. I believe you both will find that the "fool me once, shame on your, fool be twice shame on me" will relate to the Obama record, not the Bush record. I anxiously await your results but fully expect you both to run.
 
Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama. I believe you both will find that the "fool me once, shame on your, fool be twice shame on me" will relate to the Obama record, not the Bush record. I anxiously await your results but fully expect you both to run.

Don't worry conservative, the Obama supporters are going down with the the ship commanded by Obama, these guys have been brained washed and can't see the results of the Obama's administration so far, these guys are probably retired and have nothing to worry about and that's why they support his failed administration.
 
The total Bush Administration hands down beats Carter and Obama so don't even go there because you have no clue as to what you are talking about. It will be the Obama record on the ballot and things are worse today than when he took office on the all important jobs, misery index, and debt which is contrary to what he promised.

Not according to the scholars who study these things. Although I'm sure they're not as unbiased as you are. :2rofll:

Aggregate Rank:

Carter - 27
Shrub - 34 (two spots below Nixon :D)

Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Not according to the scholars who study these things. Although I'm sure they're not as unbiased as you are. :2rofll:

Aggregate Rank:

Carter - 27
Shrub - 34 (two spots below Nixon :D)

Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As requested I am waiting for you to put the side by side numbers for both Obama and Bush using the averages for both their term. You judge Bush by what he did in 2008 but ignore what he did prior to that and the total numbers are quite different that you want to admit. Stop buying what the media tells you or some so called scholars report.BEA.gov, BLS.gov, and the U.S. Treasury tell a different story.
 
You have been, and continue to be, one of the least informed persons on the board.
Why thank you. Not that I agree, mind you.
You continue to make these unsubstantiated statements that contribute nothing to healthy debate, but only serve to raise the blood pressure of the more informed.
I suppose, for the sake of argument, that you would include yourself as one of the more informed.
Stop being so shallow. This is DEBATE politics, not 3rd grade playground argument.
From what I have seen nothing would change your mind.
You have much to learn about the housing crisis... why don't you do some homework before your next post and actually teach us something while making your point. I have no issue with you taking positions contrary to me or others. I do have issue with trite comments from the ill-informed.
I know enough. I know that policy drove the crash of the mortgage markets. I know that powerful democrats were behind that policy. I know that corrupt democrats sheltered Fannie And Freddie. Take a look. And if you want more I can offer you more.

 
true......but the banks made the loans.
Do you not understand that banks were pressured by the Congress and the Administration to make those loans? If they did not make the loans they were prevented from growing. The right answer is always less government, not more government.
 
Uhmmm so these new Republicans that ran on jobs, jobs, jobs what have they proposed in the way of jobs? Or maybe a jobs bill?
The House Republicans passed a bill to eliminate Obamacare. That is the beginning of jobs. In the next Congress I hope we will see them begin to roll back the administrative state with its 80,000 regulations. I hope they will reduce the size of each of the extra-constitutional departments and agencies. And is subsequent years I hope they fire all the people, sell the buildings and free us from tyranny by unaccountable administrators.
 
Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama. I believe you both will find that the "fool me once, shame on your, fool be twice shame on me" will relate to the Obama record, not the Bush record. I anxiously await your results but fully expect you both to run.
I know you don't want to read it, but seriously, I don't want you to be surprised on Wed. Nov. 7, 2012. The guy isn't just guessing, he knows why President win. Ignore this at your own peril.

Never-Wrong Pundit Picks Obama to Win in 2012 - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)
 
Why thank you. Not that I agree, mind you.

I suppose, for the sake of argument, that you would include yourself as one of the more informed.

From what I have seen nothing would change your mind.

I know enough. I know that policy drove the crash of the mortgage markets. I know that powerful democrats were behind that policy. I know that corrupt democrats sheltered Fannie And Freddie. Take a look. And if you want more I can offer you more.


:lamo This is just plain stupid, thanks for the laugh.
 
The House Republicans passed a bill to eliminate Obamacare. That is the beginning of jobs. In the next Congress I hope we will see them begin to roll back the administrative state with its 80,000 regulations. I hope they will reduce the size of each of the extra-constitutional departments and agencies. And is subsequent years I hope they fire all the people, sell the buildings and free us from tyranny by unaccountable administrators.
If you don't like it here, move to Somalia, I'm sure there isn't any regulations there.
 
Would love to have either one of you provide for me the record of Obama's that beats the Bush record using the average over 8 years of Bush and the average of 2 1/2 years for Obama.
What kind of bull**** comparison is that? You want to compare the years Bush benefited by the housing bubble with Obama, who's record has only been damaged by it.
 
Do you not understand that banks were pressured by the Congress and the Administration to make those loans? If they did not make the loans they were prevented from growing. The right answer is always less government, not more government.

Doesn't look like they learned a thing, How about it Liblady, this is your party now?

Justice's New War Against Lenders

The Obama administration repeats mistakes of the past or are they just reimplementing their programs of the past by intimidating banks into lending to minority borrowers at below-market rates in the name of combatting discrimination.

By MARY KISSEL
August 31, 2011

Talk about not learning from past mistakes: A government department is again intimidating banks into lending to minority borrowers at below-market rates, all in the name of combating "discrimination." Welcome to the next housing mess.

Mary Kissel: Justice's New War Against Lenders - WSJ.com
 
What kind of bull**** comparison is that? You want to compare the years Bush benefited by the housing bubble with Obama, who's record has only been damaged by it.

Excuses, excuses, excuses, that is all people who have never managed anything do. As has been proven over and over again, you don't have a clue how to manage or accept responsibility for anything
 
Do you not understand that banks were pressured by the Congress and the Administration to make those loans? If they did not make the loans they were prevented from growing. The right answer is always less government, not more government.
... and ... which party controlled the House in 2004? ... which party controlled the Senate in 2004? ... which party controlled the Executive Branch in 2004?

:roll:


"Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high." ~ George Bush, 9.2.2004, RNC acceptance speech
 
I know you don't want to read it, but seriously, I don't want you to be surprised on Wed. Nov. 7, 2012. The guy isn't just guessing, he knows why President win. Ignore this at your own peril.

Never-Wrong Pundit Picks Obama to Win in 2012 - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)

No President in modern history has ever won with unemployment over 8% or the rest of his record like Obama's. Some never pay any attention to results and you and the rest of the Obama supporters are going to do everything you can to divert from the Obama record. There is always a first time for everything and the Obama record doesn't warrant re-election.
 
No President in modern history has ever won with unemployment over 8% or the rest of his record like Obama's. Some never pay any attention to results and you and the rest of the Obama supporters are going to do everything you can to divert from the Obama record. There is always a first time for everything and the Obama record doesn't warrant re-election.

Did you read the article???
 
Did you read the article???

Yes, this time I read the article and will take the record over the opinion. Times are different now, 25 million unemployed and under employed, declining labor force, rising misery index, and 14.6 trillion debt make it different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom