• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Ever, According to Gallup

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously? You're trying to complain about bias, and your source is the conservative Real Clear Politics and Cato Institute websites? :lol:

"The Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1977 by Edward H. Crane, who remains president and CEO, and Charles Koch, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of the conglomerate Koch Industries, Inc., the second largest privately held company (after Cargill) by revenue in the United States."

:lol: :lol:

Realclear politics? They post all poll numbers so what makes them "Conservative?" You really are reaching now so I repeat, what is it about liberalism that creates such loyalty and failure to acknowledge liberal failures?
 
Any idea why there is such loyalty to Obama and the liberal ideology in the face of total and complete failure of the stimulus and Obamanomics

I don't think it is necessarily loyalty to Obama, as much as it is a complete buy in to what Progressive/Socialistic ideals offer the youth by an education system that is replete with '60s era rejects that wanted nothing better than to end American exceptionalism, and capitalism as a system. They must be called out now, for their intentional attempt to destroy this country, and exposed for the liars they are.

j-mac
 
I don't think it is necessarily loyalty to Obama, as much as it is a complete buy in to what Progressive/Socialistic ideals offer the youth by an education system that is replete with '60s era rejects that wanted nothing better than to end American exceptionalism, and capitalism as a system. They must be called out now, for their intentional attempt to destroy this country, and exposed for the liars they are.

j-mac

Although few follow this forum we are doing our part to educate those that do although liberal ideologues have to learn on their own and some never do.
 
Realclear politics? They post all poll numbers so what makes them "Conservative?" You really are reaching now so I repeat, what is it about liberalism that creates such loyalty and failure to acknowledge liberal failures?

They do a lot more than post poll numbers, as you would know if you bothered to look. According to the site's founder, "we have a frustration all conservatives have", which is "the bias in media against conservatives, religious conservatives, [and] Christian conservatives."

Nah, not a conservative site. :lol:
 
Although few follow this forum we are doing our part to educate those that do although liberal ideologues have to learn on their own and some never do.

Okay Mr' Pedagog can you explain the difference btwn real numbers and nominal numbers?
 
Okay Mr' Pedagog can you explain the difference btwn real numbers and nominal numbers?

He just can't be taken seriously. Honestly, how could you take anyone seriously who only wants to look at jobs created without considering the size of the employment pool?
 
They do a lot more than post poll numbers, as you would know if you bothered to look. According to the site's founder, "we have a frustration all conservatives have", which is "the bias in media against conservatives, religious conservatives, [and] Christian conservatives."

Nah, not a conservative site. :lol:

Whether or not it is what you call a "conservative" site or not is irrelevant, the polls posted certainly aren't and that is what matters if you bothered to pay attention
 
Okay Mr' Pedagog can you explain the difference btwn real numbers and nominal numbers?

You want to spin the Obama numbers, go for it, 25 million plus unemployed and under employed are real BLS numbers. Try to justify this failure?
 
You want to spin the Obama numbers, go for it, 25 million plus unemployed and under employed are real BLS numbers. Try to justify this failure?

Oh so you don't know the difference btwn real and nominal numbers.
 
Oh so you don't know the difference btwn real and nominal numbers.

LOL, why is that relative, the Obama numbers speak for themselves, real or nominal and it isn't a pretty picture no matter what you believe. You believe the unemployment numbers are nominal and not real?
 
Whether or not it is what you call a "conservative" site or not is irrelevant, the polls posted certainly aren't and that is what matters if you bothered to pay attention

If you would pull your head out for a second you'd realize that j-mac cited an opinion piece -- not a poll.
 
LOL, why is that relative, the Obama numbers speak for themselves, real or nominal and it isn't a pretty picture no matter what you believe. You believe the unemployment numbers are nominal and not real?

Well it is relative to the question I posed to you after your boasting and bragging of superiority.
 
And if you analyze the results of that number you find that diehard liberals are part of that 41%. What are they going to do, not vote for Obama?
Good point. If liberals were smart they would be conservatives.
 
Well it is relative to the question I posed to you after your boasting and bragging of superiority.

Really? I bragged about superiority? Where? Posting facts seem to confuse you, facts that you counter with opinions
 
Isn't that what you do all the time?

No, I don't think I've ever claimed that someone who was quoting an opinion piece was actually quoting a poll.
 
No, I don't think I've ever claimed that someone who was quoting an opinion piece was actually quoting a poll.

You always counter actual facts with opinion pieces that you pass off as fact. Learn the difference
 
Really? I bragged about superiority? Where? Posting facts seem to confuse you, facts that you counter with opinions

And this has what to do with understanding nominal and real numbers?
 
You always counter actual facts with opinion pieces that you pass off as fact. Learn the difference

What I do is explain how you've misinterpretted and misrepresented the facts, which you do with regularity.
 
Why is that so important to you, diversion? Is your bank account nominal or real numbers?

You are accusing me of diversion when I asked a straight forward question?


Have you no shame?
 
What I do is explain how you've misinterpretted and misrepresented the facts, which you do with regularity.

No, sorry, you haven't done that at all. Your op ed pieces do not refute bls or bea data nor can they change the disaster that "your" President is. Results speak for themselves so stop ignoring the results all because you want to believe the liberal rhetoric.
 
You really don't have to be John Maynard Keynes to understand it. A saved job is simply one that would have been eliminated but-for the stimulus funds. These are state and local employees who would have been laid off, but who weren't laid off because the states used stimulus money to fund them. It's very apparent now, as the stimulus money winds down and states are laying off tens of thousands of workers per month.
Yes. The saved jobs were the public sector union jobs in nearly every state. Instead of eliminating the jobs the Marxist president took borrowed dollars to keep them fat, dumb, happy, and on the payroll. He knew with the corrupt alliance between union thugs and democrats the dollars would flow right through the union members through their union dues into the union coffers and then right back to the democrats.
 
Yes. The saved jobs were the public sector union jobs in nearly every state. Instead of eliminating the jobs the Marxist president took borrowed dollars to keep them fat, dumb, happy, and on the payroll. He knew with the corrupt alliance between union thugs and democrats the dollars would flow right through the union members through their union dues into the union coffers and then right back to the democrats.

Right, because we all know that gradeschool teachers, cops, and firefighters are just a bunch of shiftless, no good thugs who deserve to be put out on the street. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom