- Joined
- May 19, 2004
- Messages
- 13,938
- Reaction score
- 8,395
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
You are accurate here, but not for the reasons you state. There are very often laws against taking any action against that factory. You *should* be able to sue their ass for every {What? No... Not sure what you're saying here. What I am saying is that, for example, if I live next door to a factory that makes say some part for a jet engine, and that factor is dumping waste in the water table I use, I have no recourse without government involvement because I'm not their customer.
In a free market world, companies would be much more careful because they have risk. With the EPA, that risk is on the gov and we can't sue the gov for being stupid or ignorant of what causes harm to persons.
The entire department of education. I would argue that it does not serve in our national interest because as it has failed to enhance the education of our children. A few companies like test makers are making MILLIONS. I know you won't agree here because our definition of "national interest" is different.Lets work off of an example. Come up with a federal regulation of a corporation that doesn't serve any legitimate national interest, it just causes one private party to benefit over another.
What about the raw milk laws I mentioned earlier?
Last edited: