- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
I added the link.. so where is your apology?
Hold your breath...please? :lamo
I added the link.. so where is your apology?
You're claiming that white people can't be Muslims.
Hold your breath...please? :lamo
Most Muslims are white.
It's still an attempt to deflect attention away from it being Muslims that orchestrated the attacks, so I'm not apologizing for a ****ing thing.
Muslims use car bombs, too. They also burt into a group of unarmed people with guns blazing. Ever hear of the Fort Hood massacre?
What the **** are you babbling about? I posted information from AP and you are attacking me and once I called you on your attack, you refuse to apologize?
I never attacked you. Toughen up!
I merely pointed out that the comparison to the OKC bombing--where there was no mass shooting, BTW, as implied in the article--is a deflection to make this appear to be anything other than an attack by a Muslim extremist.
HOLY **** the backtracking there.. LOL.
But, you said the dude isn't Muslims, because he's white. Want me to post the quote again?
so it's a white guy, I was right
Why did the article imply that there were multiple attacks in OKC?
Seriously.... either you are trying to derail the thread, or you dont understand the meaning of what the AP article says. Let me help you.
Oklahoma = Right Wing White Boy
9/11 = Poor Oppressed Muslim
See the freaking difference?
All the Police source is saying, is that this is more likely a domestic terror plot, aka Oklahoma, rather than an international terror plot, aka 9/11.... nothing more nothing less.
And good night.
Nope and no information about his religion. The minister said he did not want to say more and leave that to the investigating police to come out with more information. And dont get your hopes up about information about his religion, not the tradition in Scandinavia to mention that at all.
So the poor Swedes and Danes still don't know who the victims were in Buchenwald and Auschwitz?
But most terror is not religious based, but political. Hence chances of them mentioning it is low, unless some journalist asks.
Because people don't like seeing racist get carried away
And many of us don't like to see innocent victims of religious fanaticism get carried away.
It's amazing how many leftists still think Islam is a race!
Who wants to be the first to tell this poor dear the truth?
So it's ok to hate Muslims then?
So it's ok to hate Muslims then?
It is perfectly reasonable to resist an ideology, certainly.
It's when people try to conflate an ideology with race tha they tend to get confused.
You have a strange definition of hate, and I know Islam isn't a race... I am considered white.
Then why did you use the term "racist"?
Don't pretend that this conversation isn't tinged with racism regardless.
I don't need to pretend anything. It was only you who mentioned race or racism.
We all now which ethnic groups are usually Islamic, which names are associated with Islam, etc. Barack HUSSEIN Obama. There is bigotry towards people based on the fact that they are middle eastern in itself... they could be a terrorist because of their ethnicity. Are you going to play ignorant to that fact?
And we know that terrorist groups these days are usually Islamic. They are usually from the Middle East or Pakistan, though it is growing elsewhere.. We know that.
Are you saying this should not be mentioned?
When Muslims start getting their act together and doing something positive to eliminate the terrorists and hatreds in their midst, rather than complaining about intolerance from others, (ie the seriously foolish whines of "racism") perhaps they'll find the respect they seek. But, until they do, they can expect to receive some criticism from those who find too many of them to be misogynist, sexist, and an overbearing bunch of third world neurotics.
I don't need to pretend anything. It was only you who mentioned race or racism.
And we know that terrorist groups these days are usually Islamic. They are usually from the Middle East or Pakistan, though it is growing elsewhere.. We know that.
Are you saying this should not be mentioned?
When Muslims start getting their act together and doing something positive to eliminate the terrorists and hatreds in their midst, rather than complaining about intolerance from others, (ie the seriously foolish whines of "racism") perhaps they'll find the respect they seek. But, until they do, they can expect to receive some criticism from those who find too many of them to be misogynist, sexist, and an overbearing bunch of third world neurotics.
So it's every single Muslim's duty to disassociate themselves from Muslim terrorists to you personally, because you're too bigoted to understand that all Muslims aren't terrorists.
So it's every single Muslim's duty to disassociate themselves from Muslim terrorists to you personally, because you're too bigoted to understand that all Muslims aren't terrorists.
I dont think they even know yet which group of dickweeds is responsible or if it was a lone individual. Regardless...you dont have much solid footing to cry ethnicism and anti-muslim outrage when within the first half hour of this ugly incident TWO muslim groups were tripping over themselves to claim credit.
I dont think they even know yet which group of dickweeds is responsible or if it was a lone individual. Regardless...you dont have much solid footing to cry ethnicism and anti-muslim outrage when within the first half hour of this ugly incident TWO muslim groups were tripping over themselves to claim credit.
Go back and read who was tripping over themselves to say who was guilty and whom wasn't.