- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,058
- Reaction score
- 514
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Apparently you totally missed the part where I said "But all that aside I didn't approve of that either." Why is that? What? Do you want a two paragraph post of calling Bush out everytime someone blasts Obama? Seriously...start holding Obama accountable for HIS crap and stop trying to shift the blame to Bush. Bush is not the one in charge. He is not the CiC. He is not the one sitting in the White House. He is not the one that passed the bailout crap that we had in 2009. He is not the President of the United States anymore and hasn't been for 2 years plus. Get over Bush.
See what I mean? Not only do you make excuses for the former administration here, but you still have no knowledge not only of who signed the bailouts into law, but who is ultimately responsible for them. TARP was signed into law on October 3, 2008. Who was President at that time? True, Obama may support them, but your failure to acknowledge the former President only goes to further prove my original observation correct. Your post - like it or not - was clearly ultrapartisan.
Last I looked Bush's signature was not on the bailout plan that was passed in 2009. You know...when the current president was in office? You know...the president that ran on the campaign trail that he was not Bush? You know...the President that ran on the slogan of "change"?
Lol, are you talking about the stimulus plan? Okay, what companies were bailed out in the ARRA?
I will ask you again. What is the point in blasting Bush when he is no longer in a position to do anything? Just to make you feel good? Sorry, I'm not here to make you feel good. What Bush did is in the past. As I said before I didn't like it then but there is no reason that I should continue to beat a dead horse.
Why should I have mentioned Bush first? Is he the President today? Is he the one that passed the latest bailout plan? No? Then why should I bring up Bush?
BTW, all you had to do from the very begining is ask me about my standing on Bush's bailout plan from the very begining instead of calling me ultrapartisan and and supposedly joking about me and the other person being birthers and crap. But instead you automatically went on the offensive accusing me of crap that is just not true. Even 1Perry attempted to show you the truth but you basically ignored him saying "nuh uh!". I have learned something. That you just can't let Bush go and realize that Obama is the one in charge and calling the shots and is the one responsible for the latest bailouts.
Why would I ask you that? You came into this thread, dropped a comment that was clearly ultrapartisan, and when I labelled it as such, we landed here. Regardless, you asked in post #30 "what's the difference between those and GM", regarding the bankruptcies I listed. Well, I suppose the difference is that Gee Dubya bailed one out, and not the others. Yes, I realize that you were trying to point the finger at Obama here, which tells me that you didn't know that Bush - not Obama - is the one responsible for the bailout program. You've struggle with this all thread. Perhaps it's time to do a little actual reading first : American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia