Gravity is not a theory, it's a law. There's no Theory of Gravitivity.
a chart better demonstrating that (limited) elasticity (would have given me more than 5 images):
Uh, no.Since the plan calls for a mixture of cuts and tax increases, he actually has a much larger percentage actually agreeing with him. It's not 80 %, but it's much more than 20 %.
Only 11 percent of voters want tax hikes to be used as the main way of closing the deficit, a new poll Wednesday found.
Seven percent of those surveyed by Gallup said that mostly tax increases, along with some spending cuts, would be the best way to close the deficit. Four percent of Americans say that only tax hikes should be used to cut the deficit.
Voters expressed significantly more support for spending cuts.
One in five Americans surveyed for the Gallup poll say they think the deficit is best cut down by reducing federal spending alone, while 30 percent say that the best strategy for deficit reduction would employ mostly cuts and some tax hikes. Thirty-two percent of those surveyed said they would like to see a mix of spending cuts and tax hikes.
Uh, no. Since his plan calls for a mixture of IMMEDIATE tax hikes and yet a mixture of cuts over more than TEN YEARS that are severely back dated to occur primarily on the far end, he does not have the much larger percentage actually agreeing with him. Obama's plan is primarily focused around tax increase, putting him in line with at best 11% of the people in that poll.
Increasing taxes on people immediately and cutting spending over 10 years in a primarily back loaded system is not doing so "equally".
Uh, no. Since his plan calls for a mixture of IMMEDIATE tax hikes and yet a mixture of cuts over more than TEN YEARS that are severely back dated to occur primarily on the far end, he does not have the much larger percentage actually agreeing with him. Obama's plan is primarily focused around tax increase, putting him in line with at best 11% of the people in that poll.
Increasing taxes on people immediately and cutting spending over 10 years in a primarily back loaded system is not doing so "equally".
gallup, wednesday:
Poll: Tax changes unpopular solution to debt - Jennifer Epstein - POLITICO.com
11% told america's most prestigious pollster deficit reduction should come either completely or mostly from tax hikes, compared to 50% who felt balance should come completely or mostly from cuts
Or over 70 % feel that tax increases should be part of the deficit reduction strategy.
you might actually read instead of just dropping links with misleading claims
Uh, no. Since you are going way beyond the nature of the poll, you cannot then use the poll results to back your claim.
Not at all. The Poll asks if people think it should be dealt with EQUALLY with spending cuts and tax increases.
Doing all of one thing IMMEDIATELY and doing one thing over 10 years largely backloaded is not an equal method of dealing with the issue.
Would you be peddling this same argument if it was reversed and Republicans were saying we need to cut 4 Trillion from the budget immediately and that we'd raise taxes by 10% over the next 15 years with a .1% increase for the first 10 years and and 9% over the 5 after? Would they be proposing a solution that is "equally" dealing with it through tax hikes and spending cuts because they happen to be doing both even though the majority of the tax cuts don't come until almost 10 years after the fact?
"as you may know, Congress can reduce the federal budget deficit by cutting spending, raising taxes, or a combination of the two. Ideally, how would you like to see Congress attempt to reduce the federal budget deficit(and the five options are rotated here)"
Repealing ObamaCare
save the best health care in the world repeal obama care. my cost is already going up
The difference between the theory of evolution and "Hauser's Law" is one predicts accurately, one has failed to do so. Not only did your answer not actually answer my original question, you are buying into a failed hypothesis that does not match observation.
Or consider ways to pay for it.
nice. so is that your way of saying you really don't have any response based on any kind of evidence?
look, I can do it to:
:sticks fingers in ears: nuuuhghuh!!!!!!!
Pay for it themselves.
We can work together to solve large problems. And we can use government to do that. :coffeepap
By asking "the rich" to pay?
The President is pitting American against American, which is typical of leftist class warfare everywhere.
I more more taxes than some do.
It doesn't bother me.
There's a line in a novel by King in which the judge is asked who should do the hard things in life. The answer is, the ones who can. I more more taxes than some do. It doesn't bother me. I make a fine living, and I get a lot of benefits from this country. So, stop whinning. Stop with the class warfare (that sword swings both ways you know). And work within the system we have.