• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Low Registration Sinks Tea Party Convention

One thing you have to keep in mind when comparing tax rates on millionaires in the 19 30s to now. Back then if you were a millionaire you were filthy rich, nowadays you are doing very well but barely rich.
 
HE claims to be a witness. He has no evidence of that he was actually there and considering his strong dislike I have no reason to believe he was actually there.

Hear say is also this
Hear say | Define Hear say at Dictionary.com

an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay.

Definition is erroneous, as is your attempt at character assassination. You want to call him a liar? You have to prove it.
 
I am not surprised these events are being canceled.

I can't for my bare life imagine a Teabagger having the finances to travel to a convention.
 
The Tea Party is an Attitude not a Party.

People are tired of business as usual and want to see the Constitution restored.

Obama has failed at everything he has done so far and anyone who says otherwise has serious problem with reality.
 
People are tired of business as usual and want to see the Constitution restored.
.

Where is it now? Has someone stolen it?

What exactly in the Constitution do you think is missing today?
 
HE claims to be a witness. He has no evidence of that he was actually there and considering his strong dislike I have no reason to believe he was actually there.

You know, James, I respected you up until this. I took you for an honest debator and a decent guy. No longer. If you're going to pull this kind of crap... Who the hell are you to insult my integrity and honesty this way? Should I now disbelieve every single claim you make about your experiences? How can we possibly operate in a discussion this way? No, you have lost too many points for this. To hell with you.
 
Don't like a post like that, Sangha. I don't like it. I'm disappointed. I hoped for better than this.
 
You know, James, I respected you up until this. I took you for an honest debator and a decent guy. No longer. If you're going to pull this kind of crap... Who the hell are you to insult my integrity and honesty this way? Should I now disbelieve every single claim you make about your experiences? How can we possibly operate in a discussion this way? No, you have lost too many points for this. To hell with you.

You are making the same claims that the "I hate teabaggers" band wagon usually makes about the tea party group and you claim to have personally heard them say racist comments and other similar comments. So why would anyone not be suspicious of your claims? It would be like me bashing hippies and then without any evidence say I have personally heard them say they hate the troops, they wish suicide bombers would kill more troops and other statements.
 
You are making the same claims that the "I hate teabaggers" band wagon usually makes about the tea party group and you claim to have personally heard them say racist comments and other similar comments. So why would anyone not be suspicious of your claims? It would be like me bashing hippies and then without any evidence say I have personally heard them say they hate the troops, they wish suicide bombers would kill more troops and other statements.

So, you would lie to make a point? And you assume that, by extension, Paschendale would do the same.

Weak. Says a lot more about you than it does about him.
 
You are making the same claims that the "I hate teabaggers" band wagon usually makes about the tea party group and you claim to have personally heard them say racist comments and other similar comments. So why would anyone not be suspicious of your claims? It would be like me bashing hippies and then without any evidence say I have personally heard them say they hate the troops, they wish suicide bombers would kill more troops and other statements.

Actually, you have made such an argument

Then I guess the pictures ReverendHellh0und found must be evidence that all liberals hate the troops, are communist and anarchists.



Look all liberals must be anti-war trash who want troops to shoot their commanding officers since there is a picture of them holding a sign.
shoot_officers.jpg
 
So, you would lie to make a point?

I would not lie to make a point.

However my credibility would come into question if I basically bashed a group and then claimed to have heard or seen people in that group do something that supported my claims.

And you assume that, by extension, Paschendale would do the same.

Weak. Says a lot more about you than it does about him.

He makes the same statements that the I hate teabaggers crowd makes. Why would anyone not be suspicious when he claims to heard them make racist,xenophobic or other similar remarks?
 
Actually, you have made such an argument

I have not made such an argument. I never personally claimed that I heard these people make such statements. I posted the above picture in response to another post that had photos of alleged tea party protesters holding racist signs to make the point that a few photos does not represent the whole group.
 
I would not lie to make a point.

However my credibility would come into question if I basically bashed a group and then claimed to have heard or seen people in that group do something that supported my claims.



He makes the same statements that the I hate teabaggers crowd makes. Why would anyone not be suspicious when he claims to heard them make racist,xenophobic or other similar remarks?

You're not going to win this one outside of apologizing to the man. In your shoes, I wouldn't waste my breath. You ****ed up. Own it or don't own it, but don't try to convince me otherwise.
 
I have not made such an argument. I never personally claimed that I heard these people make such statements. I posted the above picture in response to another post that had photos of alleged tea party protesters holding racist signs to make the point that a few photos does not represent the whole group.

No, your response mentioned "all" not "represents the whole group". I even quoted you.
 
You're not going to win this one outside of apologizing to the man. In your shoes, I wouldn't waste my breath. You ****ed up. Own it or don't own it, but don't try to convince me otherwise.
Other than the I hate tea baggers crowd only a ****en moron would believe anything someone who utters the same lies and nonsense made by the I hate tea baggers crowd. So which are you?
 
Last edited:
I did not paint ALL teabaggers as racist.

Then why use four photos of alleged tea party members holding racists signs as evidence that the tea party is racist to counter my claim that there was no evidence? I realize that every group has its loonies and nuts, but I am not going to use a few photo to act as though the group itself is like those loonies and nuts.
 
Last edited:
Then why use four photos of alleged tea party members holding racists signs as evidence that the tea party is racist?

To show that the Party as a whole does not reject the racists. The racist teabaggers have even formed their own tea tantrum organizations with many supporters who are tea baggers.

And I only posted a limited # of photos because DP limits the # of photos one can put in a post. There are plenty more
 
To show that the Party as a whole does not reject the racists. The racist teabaggers have even formed their own tea tantrum organizations with many supporters who are tea baggers.

When you go around calling the tea party members racist and teabaggers and try to use a handful of photos to paint that group as racist you lose any credibility.

And I only posted a limited # of photos because DP limits the # of photos one can put in a post. There are plenty more

There is a five photo limit per post and as far as I know you can post unlimited number of links.
 
Other than the I hate tea baggers crowd only a ****en moron would believe anything someone who utters the same lies and nonsense made by the I hate tea baggers crowd. So which are you?

I don't hate Tea Partiers. I hate racists, bigots, and @$$holes and hypocrites. I also hate those who willfully harm others. If Bernie Sanders said that gays were subhuman, I'd hate him too. It is our actions, which include the statements we make, not our affiliation, that determines who we are. You have shown your true colors. I'm disappointed in you.
 
Other than the I hate tea baggers crowd only a ****en moron would believe anything someone who utters the same lies and nonsense made by the I hate tea baggers crowd. So which are you?

Me? I'm the one who actually reports personal attacks.
 
How many of the of the Tea "Party" candidates are independent or democrat? The voters may be a mix of independents, democrats and republicans but it still does not change the fact that all the so called tea party candidates are republicans. If I am wrong then please show me how I am wrong.

you're not wrong ........ but then by the same token .... I haven't seen too many Democrats running...... that are in favor of less spending ... smaller more efficient government, and less government intervention ...... have you ??
 
Back
Top Bottom