• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Casey Anthony Trial: Jury Reaches Verdict

If you kill your child why would you obey that law. The law is there to protect the innocent not the guilty

if you killed your child, and you know where she is, she's not missing. so wouldn't reporting her missing being lying to leo?
 
If you kill your child why would you obey that law. The law is there to protect the innocent not the guilty

Why doesn't matter. The Constitution prohibits the govt from forcing testimony from a citizen that can be used against them.
 
I'm still baffled by the number of people who thing anyone is defending her. We're defending the jury acuital of a murder charge by explaining how and why they came to that conclusions

If I started a thread about WWII, and described some of the things that Hitler did, that would not mean that I support those things.

It's not a complicated idea. In fact, it's much easier than assuming others are evil just because they disagree with you

apparently you just ignored all the posts talking about how she acted like this because of x,y,z, etc. trying to rationalize why she acted guilty.

I have no problem with the court system. do try to keep up.
 
apparently you just ignored all the posts talking about how she acted like this because of x,y,z, etc. trying to rationalize why she acted guilty.

I have no problem with the court system. do try to keep up.

Those are known as "explanations", not "defenses"

And you should have a problem with the court system. Specifically, the prosecutors who completely messed up the case.
 
Those are known as "explanations", not "defenses"

And you should have a problem with the court system. Specifically, the prosecutors who completely messed up the case.

I dont think they messed up the case. Just because its not the end result you wanted. They didnt have the evidence. Period.
 
I dont think they messed up the case. Just because its not the end result you wanted. They didnt have the evidence. Period.

Then you misunderstand what I said

Trying to convict someone of a murder with being able to prove that the child was murdered at all is foolish when there were charges they could have proven in court. The prosecutors decided to go for the long shot, instead of going for lesser charges that would have been a slam dunk
 
it should haunt her the rest of her miserable life. she is not a victim, caylee was HER victim. the jury did not find her innocent.
how did she kill caylee?
 
:2bigcry: everybody knows she's innocent. it was her child molesting father and brother who did it and then tried to frame her. :roll:
 
:2bigcry: everybody knows she's innocent. it was her child molesting father and brother who did it and then tried to frame her. :roll:

Yeah, that's what every person in this thread is saying. What? No one said she was innocent? My bad.
 
i believe it was proven that her mother lied about the chloroform search.

No, it wasn't. The rebuttal testimony showed that somebody used Cindy's computer at the office that day, for about 20 minutes. It also showed that Cindy was shown to be at work that day. Deposition testimony from her employer confirmed that timecard records are largely inaccurate and unreliable. So what we're left with is Cindy's login being used for 20 minutes. Nobody can confirm whether they physically saw her at work that day.

In 2009, Cindy's deposition stated that she made the chloroform searches, which corroborates her testimony in 2011. If she's lying, she's as consistent as Casey and her credibility regarding the entire situation is in question as much as Casey's. If she's telling the truth then she made the searches.

But even if Cindy didn't make them, that doesn't mean Casey did it.
 
another thing: how the hell they ruled not guilty on the child abuse charge is unbelievable. the mere fact that the kid was missing for a month before she told anyone is, in itself, child abuse. your kid is missing and instead of telling someone, you make up a lie about a non-existant nanny and go out partying?

how can you abuse a dead child?
 
it should haunt her the rest of her miserable life. she is not a victim, caylee was HER victim. the jury did not find her innocent.

I'm lead to believe that your statement would be in response to the closing sentence of my post? In response the Jury did not find her Guilty either, and until proven guilty, her innocence is protected under the Law! Therefore, further prosecution by the Public, and Media is making her a Victim. If you had evidence that she committed murder you should have reported it! If you have no such evidence then your assertions of guilt hold as much water as the Prosecutions.
 
how can you abuse a dead child?

apparently, since she was "not guilty" and didn't kill her child, to her knowledge the kid wasn't dead...just "missing". not reporting that your child is missing is neglect, which qualifies as child abuse.
 
Back
Top Bottom