GPS_Flex
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 20, 2005
- Messages
- 2,726
- Reaction score
- 648
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
With what exactly? That the court said what it said? Or you disagree with the court's reasoning? Or what?
So you've made up your mind and settled the matter.
If you're willing to include following established precedent as judicial activism.
Try reading the ruling. They find a bill that removes race as a consideration to be “racist”.
Get a clue dude.
We therefore find that the race-conscious admissions policies now barred by
Proposal 2 inure primarily to the benefit of racial minorities and that Proposal 2, insofar
as it prohibits consideration of applicants’ race in admissions decisions, has a “racial
focus.”