- Joined
- Jul 27, 2010
- Messages
- 37,412
- Reaction score
- 13,542
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
You don't know they would have done so anyways, you're making that assumption based off the entraped senario wherein the crime is facilitated outside, coordinated with law enforcement. If some perv is sitting in an adult chat room and some "kid" (there's no kid) starts chatting up, it's different than if they're trolling. And that doesn't even speak to whether or not they would go less heavily encouraged by the other party. It's definitily not something people should do; but because we've attached so much emotion to this particular form of crime, we allow ourselves to become blind to the actions taken by authority and others. You still can't entrap, and this seems to me to be very clearly entrapment.
I am not aware of these people actually being accused of sex with a minor or being charged with a crime like statutory rape.
We aren't charging them with a crime they didn't commit, and are you honestly arguing that these people would go to a young girl's house "just to hang out?" Are you telling me you believe their excuses?
What they did was inappropriate and socially unacceptable? Can you at least agree with that?
As far as what these guys are charged with, what are they charged with? Is Chris Hansen just humiliating them, or are they charged with a crime, and what's the crime?
In any case these males are acting on behavior that is unacceptable and potentially dangerous to other people in society. I am not being over emotional. The point is, if they are outed then that's better than not being outed, wouldn't you agree?
And what do you even suggest be done?