• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UN body votes for protection of gay rights

Usually when a "homo" declares that they are not a woman, it's because they have a penis. For some reason, you seem to have not learned the basic preschool lesson about the difference between girls and boys.

If you are so good with basic preschool lesson, tell me: Should all husbands have a penis or a vagina or both or none of it?
 
If you are so good with basic preschool lesson, tell me: Should all husbands have a penis or a vagina or both or none of it?

Ummm husbands always have penises.
 
If you are so good with basic preschool lesson, tell me: Should all husbands have a penis or a vagina or both or none of it?


Apparently, you're the expert in human anatomy and sexuality. So you should tell us: if it has a penis is it a man or woman? Also, what do you care if 2 duds want to do it? Does it affect you? Since apparently, birth rates are the only reason for sexual relationships, what does that mean for infertile people? Should they be denied a meaningful relationship with a person? Since I'm an adoptive father, maybe you can tell me how I've ruined society. While you're at it, you can expound on why my children would be better off with no parents.

I'l let other people rip your "answers" to shreds. I'm through with you.
 
Rights are inherant. IE they are there whether people use them or not. Believe it or not things can exist outside of humans.
30 years ago, you had no right to tell anyone not to smoke in a restaurant. 30 years later today, you have such right in nearly all American restaurants. Is this right inherited? Why were you not allowed to inherited the same right 30 years ago if such right must only be inherited?

And I portray myself in many ways. Some would call me liberal in one subject while in another they would call me a conservative.
Yes, I understand that. On this I cannot put up argument with you. America is in a very confusing state as far as ideology is concerned. Many self-claimed conservatives just advocate and escort full scale the program that guarantees rearing bastards with public money; while such bastards can only demand socialist agenda when they grow up. However, at this point, I have not yet seen you put up any point that is close to what I think conservative. In San Francisco, there is such a law: If a person, regardless of the actual gender you may conceive "she" possesses, wearing makeup as a woman but you, as a government worker, failed to address “her” with “proper” gender pronoun, such as ms, mam, young lady… you are fired on the base of discrimination. Getting used to the SF atmosphere for too long, I can only judge you with what you have portrayed yourself, but not with the part you have not exposed to me.
And telling someone "Whatever the hell it is that you're smoking....keep it the hell away from me" is a nice way of telling them that they are acting like idiots. Its a reference to wacky tobacky. It has nothing what-so-ever to do with speech.
Yes, you can put up your explanation, but your words have been out, cannot be taken back.
 
If you are so good with basic preschool lesson, tell me: Should all husbands have a penis or a vagina or both or none of it?

Husband is a male term...and thus deems a Penis by definition. Wife is a female term, and this a vagina.

So....we come up with the terms...Partner, significant other, or in some cases....husband to a male, or wife to a female.

It may not be preschool ( I hope not)...but it IS common sense and logical thought...try it, it's refreshing.
 
Ummm husbands always have penises.
Then, it must be either you or Ellen DeGeneres who is mistaken. Oh, year, of course, you then can put up a check-made by asking me: How do you know Ellen DeGeneres does not have a penis? Ellen DeGeneres openly tells everyone in all TV shows that "he" has a wife!
 
It will be interesting to see if this rights declaration has any meaningful impact on governments which either sanction or turn a blind eye to gay/lesbian persecution.

It won't have any effect on the U.S.
 
You realize that in several countries gay people are put to death right?

They'd do it in the South if they could get away with it.
 
Apparently, you're the expert in human anatomy and sexuality. So you should tell us: if it has a penis is it a man or woman?
It has been apparent that what I told you will not be accepted by you. Why do you give you such a difficult task? May be it is more proper for me to ask you: if it has no penis is it a man or woman? I am sure you will accept an answer from Ellen DeGeeneres.

As to your making me answer you how you have ruined the American society, I can only tell you this: I have no courage to advocate to others that your own kind of people have pushed forward the otherwise never seen prosperity of America.
 
Then, it must be either you or Ellen DeGeneres who is mistaken. Oh, year, of course, you then can put up a check-made by asking me: How do you know Ellen DeGeneres does not have a penis? Ellen DeGeneres openly tells everyone in all TV shows that "he" has a wife!

What the **** are you talking about? She is female. Therefor she doesnt have a penis. It doesnt matter if she has a wife or a husband she is still female.
 
Husband is a male term...and thus deems a Penis by definition. Wife is a female term, and this a vagina.

So....we come up with the terms...Partner, significant other, or in some cases....husband to a male, or wife to a female.

It may not be preschool ( I hope not)...but it IS common sense and logical thought...try it, it's refreshing.

If you are talking about artificial organ transplant, yes, it may even include brain. Do you need one to be so transplanted?
 
What the **** are you talking about? She is female. Therefor she doesnt have a penis. It doesnt matter if she has a wife or a husband she is still female.
Ummm, young lady, don’t lose manner with me. It is you who put up the definition of husband. The counter part of a wife is naturally husband, who, according to you:
Ummm husbands always have penises.
Now, you want to tell me a new gender is found among human beings: a female with penis, which is typically found on Ellen DeGeneres? I wonder if you have also found her possessing vagina or not.
 
Ummm, young lady, don’t lose manner with me. It is you who put up the definition of husband. The counter part of a wife is naturally husband, who, according to you:

Now, you want to tell me a new gender is found among human beings: a female with penis, which is typically found on Ellen DeGeneres? I wonder if you have also found her possessing vagina or not.

Oh god im done here.
 
Oh god im done here.

It is OK, I have nothing against you. Indeed, I feel you being on my side to help to straighten some difinition with other people in this thread. Thanks.
 
30 years ago, you had no right to tell anyone not to smoke in a restaurant. 30 years later today, you have such right in nearly all American restaurants. Is this right inherited? Why were you not allowed to inherited the same right 30 years ago if such right must only be inherited?

Actually the owner did have that right. And I believe that they should still have that right. (I'm against banning owners of restraunts to dictate if their establishment is smoking or not) The fact that it has been surpressed by mob mentality doesn't mean that its not there though. Anything can be surpressed but still exist.

Also I think you have the words "inherant" and "inherited" confused. "Inherited" is something that is passed down from one person to another. "Inherant" is something that has always been or is a part of something else. EX: DNA is a part of a human being.

Yes, I understand that. On this I cannot put up argument with you. America is in a very confusing state as far as ideology is concerned. Many self-claimed conservatives just advocate and escort full scale the program that guarantees rearing bastards with public money; while such bastards can only demand socialist agenda when they grow up. However, at this point, I have not yet seen you put up any point that is close to what I think conservative. In San Francisco, there is such a law: If a person, regardless of the actual gender you may conceive "she" possesses, wearing makeup as a woman but you, as a government worker, failed to address “her” with “proper” gender pronoun, such as ms, mam, young lady… you are fired on the base of discrimination. Getting used to the SF atmosphere for too long, I can only judge you with what you have portrayed yourself, but not with the part you have not exposed to me.

Then perhaps before asigning a label to someone you should get to know them first?

Yes, you can put up your explanation, but your words have been out, cannot be taken back.

If I ever decide to take back my words then I will generally apologize for those words. But in this case I'm not trying to take back any of my words. ;) I stand by them.
 
If you are talking about artificial organ transplant, yes, it may even include brain. Do you need one to be so transplanted?

Obviously, as you not only failed to reply coherently to my post, but somehow managed to post such gibberish as to confuse everyone...you have absolutely nothing to offer on a debate board, probably should not be here.

And as of now, for me at least...you are not.


Ignore:2wave:
 
It has been apparent that what I told you will not be accepted by you. Why do you give you such a difficult task? May be it is more proper for me to ask you: if it has no penis is it a man or woman? I am sure you will accept an answer from Ellen DeGeeneres.

Actually this isn't technically correct. I know its quibbleing but a person could be a eunuch or could be a female/male plant. ;)

Semantical arguement I know, but there it is. :)
 
Actually the owner did have that right. And I believe that they should still have that right. (I'm against banning owners of restraunts to dictate if their establishment is smoking or not) The fact that it has been surpressed by mob mentality doesn't mean that its not there though. Anything can be surpressed but still exist.
I am talking about YOUR right, not the restaurant owner’s right. If a right is suppressed, it is not there anymore. In a lawsuit, if you lose, the winning party can have a right to ask compensation from you. If you later appeal and win, his right is suppressed, no more, it is gone! Don’t be stupid to continue to pay what you don’t need to.
Also I think you have the words "inherant" and "inherited" confused. "Inherited" is something that is passed down from one person to another. "Inherant" is something that has always been or is a part of something else. EX: DNA is a part of a human being.
I found no word as inherant in the dictionary. I took it as a typo. Since you repeated it several times, I consider replacing it with inherit. If you mean inherent, the right is even more remote from a possibility of existence if there is not a force to guarantee its existence. A fly, coded by the gene from its ancestors, has an inherent desire to share the food on your plate; do you consider it as an inherent right of the fly? Go back to the law suit case mentioned above, which party has the right that can be considered inherent?
Then perhaps before asigning a label to someone you should get to know them first?
Oh, that person already assigned a label to him/herself with words, actions… except the part she/he feels the need to conceal. If everybody does not judge the value of someone else by what he/she exposes, or judge by what is not exposed, no society can even reasonably exist.
 
Back
Top Bottom