• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senate sidetracks move to repeal ethanol credit

Harry Guerrilla

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
28,951
Reaction score
12,422
Location
Not affiliated with other libertarians.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
WASHINGTON – The Senate refused to kill a $5 billion annual subsidy for ethanol on Tuesday, backing continued government aid for a Farm Belt-based industry over deficit reduction in an era of record red ink.

The 40-59 vote, far short of the 60 needed to advance the measure, reflected regional as well as partisan differences, a split among Republicans — and anything but the final word on the issue.

Senate sidetracks move to repeal ethanol credit - Yahoo! News

They couldn't even remove one of the most horrid and bipartisanly disliked subsidies in the nation. :censored
 
Ethanol is one of the most useless and even destructive products this country manufactures!!! Just the mileage ALONE is utter crap. YOu get about 10-14 miles per gallon LESS on that crap.
 
Ethenol causes the cost of most meat products to go up because it's a major feed got the animals we like to eat.
Here we have the Democrats who control the Senate are propping up big agribusiness, and don't they raise hell if even looks like a Conservative wants anything close.

This $5 billion dollars could be used to retrofit those coal fired power plants Obama is going to let close.

I ask again that everyone email their Congresspeople and Senators as I have to push for the saving of these plants. It's in our best interest and Liberals should get behind along with everyone else because it's a bout clean power, jobs, and economies.

If it catches on I don't care who gets the credit for the idea.

This will have a better return than Ethanol ever will.
 
Last edited:
Ethenol causes the cost of most meat products to go up because it's a major feed got the animals we like to eat.
Here we have the Democrats who control the Senate are propping up big agribusiness, and don't they raise hell if even looks like a Conservative wants anything close.

This $5 billion dollars could be used to retrofit those coal fired power plants Obama is going to let close.

I ask again that everyone email their Congresspeople and Senators as I have to push for the saving of these plants. It's in our best interest and Liberals should get behind along with everyone else because it's a bout clean power, jobs, and economies.

If it catches on I don't care who gets the credit for the idea.

This will have a better return than Ethanol ever will.

Democrats can't decide whether their in the pocket of big business or not. They point fingers at Republicans all the while shoveling $billions under the table to their supporters. :lol:
 
Sadly its not just Democrats on this one. We had 12 Republicans who sat there and voted along with them.
 
i've always felt ethanol got undue favorability cuzza the prominence of IOWA every 4 years

wapo's take:

A majority of Senate Republicans appeared to break Tuesday with two decades of GOP orthodoxy against higher taxes, voting to advance a plan to abruptly cancel billions of dollars in annual tax credits for ethanol blenders.

The measure, offered by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), fell short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster threat. But it had the support of 34 of 47 Republicans, most of whom have signed an anti-tax pledge that specifically prohibits raising taxes by any means but economic growth.

Coburn has argued forcefully that Republicans must abandon that pledge if they are serious about tackling the spiraling national debt. Though the Senate turned back his measure, he said the vote nonetheless marks the beginning of the end of GOP tolerance for wasteful giveaways through the tax code.

“You’ve got 34 Republicans that say they’re willing to end this, regardless of what Grover says,” Coburn said, referring to pledge creator Grover G. Norquist, the founder of Americans for Tax Reform. “That’s 34 Republicans that say this is more important than a signed pledge to ATR.”

The vote was hardly a slam dunk for Coburn’s crusade against the dozens of tax credits and deductions that he derides as government spending by another name. Several senators who voted against the ethanol credit, which is widely condemned by Republicans as bad economic policy, said they would not necessarily vote to end other types of tax breaks.

Senate vote to repeal ethanol tax credit fails, but some in GOP break ranks - The Washington Post

corporate welfare, anyone?

where's difi?
 
The measure, offered by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), fell short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster threat. But it had the support of 34 of 47 Republicans, most of whom have signed an anti-tax pledge that specifically prohibits raising taxes by any means but economic growth.

Coburn has argued forcefully that Republicans must abandon that pledge if they are serious about tackling the spiraling national debt. Though the Senate turned back his measure, he said the vote nonetheless marks the beginning of the end of GOP tolerance for wasteful giveaways through the tax code.

I like the cut of this Coburn guys jib. He is clearly willing to pragmatic realities over dogmatic nonsense, and he started by firing and shot at the most corrupt and worthless tax breaks.
 
Seems like everything gets stalled up in the Senate these days...
 
The mere existence of corn ethanol is illogical, let alone subsidies for it. *sigh*
 
Remove subsidies? That doesn't sound like something the government would do.

No. Youre right. I think they wanted to remove sub-cities because they werent paying enough taxes, but with Weiner and all the media, they got confused.
 
No. Youre right. I think they wanted to remove sub-cities because they werent paying enough taxes, but with Weiner and all the media, they got confused.

Damned New New York leeches...
 
Sadly its not just Democrats on this one. We had 12 Republicans who sat there and voted along with them.

People seem to expect this pork from Democrats, but less so from Republicans.
 
Senate Votes to Repeal Ethanol Tax Credits
The Senate on Thursday voted to repeal billions in ethanol tax credits, after an identical proposal failed just two days earlier.

In a bipartisan 73-27 vote, the Senate stripped about $6 billion a year in credits from the industry. The same proposal from Republican Sen. Tom Coburn failed on Tuesday, but only because Democrats were peeved at him for forcing a vote on his amendment. When an identical amendment by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein came up Thursday, Democrats and Republicans overwhelmingly supported it.

The amendment would repeal the credits and dedicate them to deficit reduction.

At the same time, the Senate rejected an effort to eliminate a government program that supports the distribution of ethanol. The two votes sent mixed signals about federal support for a Farm Belt industry that is in danger of becoming a casualty of budget cutting efforts.

The measure that was defeated would have eliminated government funding for ethanol blender pumps and storage facilities, which are the infrastructure the industry says it needs to get its product to consumers. The House passed a similar measure Thursday and added it to an agriculture spending bill.

A... good.
B... Proof Democrats are hypocritical asshats
 
Sadly its not just Democrats on this one. We had 12 Republicans who sat there and voted along with them.

Yep, and look at what states they are from too.

Bribing voters with gold from the treasury.
 
Then you wonder why babyboomers told the teaparty to stick ryans plan in thier ass...they want to mangle the middleclass and workers and keep all these bs subsidies...big oil, ethanol......this just strengthens my resolve against the attack on the working class

oops I misread this...I thought it didnt pass...sorry :)
 
The similarities between the stupidities that brought us this giant ethanol boondoggle, and the push to harness "man-made global warming", are amazing !

Carbon-credits and carbon-taxes would be like the ethanol program on high-octane steroids.
 
Then you wonder why babyboomers told the teaparty to stick ryans plan in thier ass...they want to mangle the middleclass and workers and keep all these bs subsidies...big oil, ethanol......this just strengthens my resolve against the attack on the working class

Babyboomers did no such thing. Democrats did.
 
wrong babyboomers were against ryans plan...

Complete bull****. Let me guess, you watched a couple of town-halls where the unions sent in some cronies.

HELLO ! "Its the Democrats stupid".
 
Complete bull****. Let me guess, you watched a couple of town-halls where the unions sent in some cronies.

HELLO ! "Its the Democrats stupid".

That pretty much sums up the problems the democracies are facing, Too many leftists are guessing at the facts.
 
wrong babyboomers were against ryans plan...

actually when asked to vote between Ryan and Obama's plan, boomers gave a plurality to Ryan.
 
Back
Top Bottom