• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Email Trove Reflects Scrutiny Palin Faced After Emerging as VP Pick

Councilman

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
4,454
Reaction score
1,657
Location
Riverside, County, CA.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I hope they are going to be very disappointed when it's all said and done.

My guess is the vast majority of the emails are doing to be incoming from people wanting something, some who have suggestions, and who are nuts.

Most of the communications I ever got were from people who either wanted something or thise who complained because I did end up being on the short end of some very close 6 to 1 votes.

Email Trove Reflects Scrutiny Palin Faced After Emerging as VP Pick - FoxNews.com

An early look at the trove of emails released Friday from Sarah Palin's first two years as Alaska's governor gives an idea of the sudden scrutiny she faced after she was selected as the Republicans' vice presidential nominee in 2008.

Some of the messages she received at the time were blatantly threatening. In one dated Sept. 12, 2008, the sender said Palin should "be shot," using several vulgarities to refer to her. Another email the next day, supposedly from somebody in Belgium, made the same threat.

Other emails in the trove released Friday include questions from reporters and more subdued complaints from the public. In one Sept. 13 email, a Juneau resident said she was "very angry" regarding reports that Palin's husband Todd was involved in official meetings.
 
How about... workoholic... or.. slavedriver? Something more befitting and stupid and negative?
 
Video of the Obamatron Journ-O-lists launching an attack on Palin.
Apologies for the mis-title of the video.



.
 
Last edited:
That damn liberal media...

The host displayed what he, CNN, and the rest of the liberal media was interested in, when he asked the reporter if he found any emails criticizing the media, on trooper-gate, or the accusations of ethics violations. You have to know the pain they were feeling having to report the fact that the emails didn't fit their narrative of Sarah Palin. In fact, the reporter at the end of the piece seemed a bit surprised when he had to say as much.

The liberal media made such a big deal out of this because they were sure they would find some dirt on Palin they could attack her with, that they had to report on it no matter what they ended up finding. Liberal biased or not, they were obligated to report on their findings, instead of doing what they would normally do with a positive story like this, which is simply ignore it.

We all know what MSNBC will do, but let's see how ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, WAPO and others report on this.

Exit question:
If no major dirt is dug up by the media on Palin, how long will it take before they accuse her of a cover up?
 
Last edited:
The host displayed what he, CNN, and the rest of the liberal media was interested in, when he asked the reporter if he found any emails criticizing the media, on trooper-gate, or the accusations of ethics violations. You have to know the pain they were feeling having to report the fact that the emails didn't fit their narrative of Sarah Palin. In fact, the reporter at the end of the piece seemed a bit surprised when he had to say as much.

The liberal media made such a big deal out of this because they were sure they would find some dirt on Palin they could attack her with, that they had to report on it no matter what they ended up finding. Liberal biased or not, they were obligated to report on their findings, instead of doing what they would normally do with a positive story like this, which is simply ignore it.

We all know what MSNBC will do, but let's see how ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, WAPO and others report on this.

HOLY ****! The media likes scandal! Who would have guessed that?!?
 
Editor's correction in Bold:
HOLY ****! The media likes scandal from the right! Who would have guessed that considering all the passes they gave Clinton, Obama and now The Weiner?!? You just don't see that type of blindness from the journ-O-lists when it's someone on the right.

Editor's question: Do you?

.
 
HOLY ****! The media likes scandal! Who would have guessed that?!?

Redress is in full hyper-partisan damage control PR Spin mode to cover up why the media is spending an inordinate amount of time on Sarah Palin, instead of covering and investigating important stories.
 
The host displayed what he, CNN, and the rest of the liberal media was interested in, when he asked the reporter if he found any emails criticizing the media, on trooper-gate, or the accusations of ethics violations. You have to know the pain they were feeling having to report the fact that the emails didn't fit their narrative of Sarah Palin. In fact, the reporter at the end of the piece seemed a bit surprised when he had to say as much.

The liberal media made such a big deal out of this because they were sure they would find some dirt on Palin they could attack her with, that they had to report on it no matter what they ended up finding. Liberal biased or not, they were obligated to report on their findings, instead of doing what they would normally do with a positive story like this, which is simply ignore it.

We all know what MSNBC will do, but let's see how ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, WAPO and others report on this.

Exit question:
If no major dirt is dug up by the media on Palin, how long will it take before they accuse her of a cover up?

Maybe you should post this question in the conspiracy section of DP. :roll:

:cuckoo:
 
Didn't she involve God in producing her budget? Or is it permissible to bring in unauthorised outside alien agencies?
 
Didn't she involve God in producing her budget? Or is it permissible to bring in unauthorised outside alien agencies?
InGodWeTrust.jpg


.
 
Who thinks this will finally get the Liberal Obamedia to back off of Sarah Palin.

I think they will keep just making up lies to attack her.

I think I figured out one reason they have kept up the lies and attacks past being afraid of her politically.

I think they are using her as a diversion to help keep the focus off of Obama's failures.

Think about it every time the economic numbers go down the attacks on Sarah Palin go up

She's not running for anything, all she's doing is going around on a bus talking about the Constitution how threatening is that.

I think the Papers knew there was nothing to find in these emails but and that is why they asked for volunteers to go through them, they didn't want to invest any time and money on something they knew was not there to find, but look at all the attention it got and how much time was spent on the emails and not on the Job numbers of the cost of gas or the needless closing of coal fired power plants.
 
Who thinks this will finally get the Liberal Obamedia to back off of Sarah Palin.

I think they will keep just making up lies to attack her.

I think I figured out one reason they have kept up the lies and attacks past being afraid of her politically.

I think they are using her as a diversion to help keep the focus off of Obama's failures.

Think about it every time the economic numbers go down the attacks on Sarah Palin go up

She's not running for anything, all she's doing is going around on a bus talking about the Constitution how threatening is that.

I think the Papers knew there was nothing to find in these emails but and that is why they asked for volunteers to go through them, they didn't want to invest any time and money on something they knew was not there to find, but look at all the attention it got and how much time was spent on the emails and not on the Job numbers of the cost of gas or the needless closing of coal fired power plants.

There are two stories that illustrate they will continue on despite the facts:

1. Clinton and why he was impeached. You still have libs here that whine about it being a sex scandal (happened just the other day). They're either uninformed and haven't heard it was due to his lying before a Grand Jury under oath, something called perjury in an attempt to deny a citizen their day in court, or they are intellectually and morally bankrupt.

2. This one is despicable, but it's their own doing, and they have to live with it. Voting for Iraq War II, and the Senate libs asked for and got a SECOND vote in an attempt to undo 30-years of hostility to our intel and military services. A vote of political expediency, proven by the fact they went back to their old colors when Bush seemed too popular. All did an about face (all except Lieberman who they tried to pry out of his seat), and stabbed our troops in the back.

When you have people voting to send troops into battle... the most serious vote an elected official will make... when they didn't believe it, and their journ-O-lists are running propaganda for them, what chance is there that they will report accurately about Palin?

Zero.

.
 
Last edited:
Why would they have to conduct damage control?

A competent and hard-working public official does not mesh with the desired narrative of a fumbling ditz who should not be trusted with so much as a stapler let alone the Presidency. This probably means the story will be swiftly buried. Maybe Wiener can send out a few more tweets.
 
Redress is in full hyper-partisan damage control PR Spin mode to cover up why the media is spending an inordinate amount of time on Sarah Palin, instead of covering and investigating important stories.

Actually, the reason why they spend so much time on Palin is because they love her theatrics and antics, and keep her on the spotlight, so that she will become intoxicated with the media and run as the GOP candidate. Then, Obama will win 100%
 
Actually, the reason why they spend so much time on Palin is because they love her theatrics and antics, and keep her on the spotlight, so that she will become intoxicated with the media and run as the GOP candidate. Then, Obama will win 100%

I she's intoxicated on anything it's the millions she's making and the Liberals are helping sell books and making her even more poular with people who know the facts about her. BTW what antics, I haven't seen one yet and I'm a news junkie.

You know she was over $300,000 in debt when she left office and now she has purchased a home in AZ and paid cash so keep her in the spot light because it just helps her.
 
I she's intoxicated on anything it's the millions she's making and the Liberals are helping sell books and making her even more poular with people who know the facts about her. BTW what antics, I haven't seen one yet and I'm a news junkie.

You know she was over $300,000 in debt when she left office and now she has purchased a home in AZ and paid cash so keep her in the spot light because it just helps her.

As for the first paragraph, yes, she's growing more and more popular with the people she's already popular with. The moderate Republicans, the moderates, and the left are all disgusted with her. Only the far right is she popular with, and that's because they "know" facts about her, right? Her antics are numerous, and I thought up of several now, and the North Korea, Paul Rever, and the blood libel are just the three antics I bother to post
 
That damn liberal media...

I know that you agree they've overdone it with Palin. I've never seen a politician have to put up with more **** than her.
 
The host displayed what he, CNN, and the rest of the liberal media was interested in, when he asked the reporter if he found any emails criticizing the media, on trooper-gate, or the accusations of ethics violations. You have to know the pain they were feeling having to report the fact that the emails didn't fit their narrative of Sarah Palin. In fact, the reporter at the end of the piece seemed a bit surprised when he had to say as much.

The liberal media made such a big deal out of this because they were sure they would find some dirt on Palin they could attack her with, that they had to report on it no matter what they ended up finding. Liberal biased or not, they were obligated to report on their findings, instead of doing what they would normally do with a positive story like this, which is simply ignore it.

We all know what MSNBC will do, but let's see how ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, WAPO and others report on this.

Exit question:
If no major dirt is dug up by the media on Palin, how long will it take before they accuse her of a cover up?

One of the libtards on this board is doing that already in another thread.
 
I hope they are going to be very disappointed when it's all said and done.

My guess is the vast majority of the emails are doing to be incoming from people wanting something, some who have suggestions, and who are nuts.

Most of the communications I ever got were from people who either wanted something or thise who complained because I did end up being on the short end of some very close 6 to 1 votes.

I guess they were hoping to find something dirty on Palin. Like maybe some bribes, her acting all Martha Stewart or Nancy Grace(acting like a real bitch,but not just any bitch but the queen of all bitches , such a bitch that other women who act like bitches take lessons from them ) on the staff sexual, Maybe her youngest kid is really her daughter'sm or some sexual relations with the pool boy, although they live in Alaska some maybe its the igloo maker boy instead of the pool boy.
 
Last edited:
Actually, the reason why they spend so much time on Palin is because they love her theatrics and antics, and keep her on the spotlight, so that she will become intoxicated with the media and run as the GOP candidate. Then, Obama will win 100%
I'd like to address you statement in bold:

What is Obama going to run on? ObamaKare he shoved through that people did not want?

Taking trillions out of the economy to run it through the government grinder, handing it to his special interests and saying this would restore the economy?

9.1% Unemployment?

His partisanship?

I don't think the public is going to smoke dat shid a second time. He has a clear record now and it's spelled... failure.

.
 
Back
Top Bottom