Actually, no, because the questions didn't all ask about what would happen assuming DADT was repealed. In fact, some of the questions asked about whether a person served with anyone they knew was gay and how it affected the work environment.
I know personally of about 800 personnel who could honestly answer that question at the very least, "there was no significant affect". My department had at least a dozen openly gay personnel, men and women, during the 4 1/2 years aboard the ship. Everyone knew they were gay, no one cared. There were none of the problems that everyone is afraid of, like people getting beat up for being gay or a lot of same sex sexual harassment claims (although my berthing did get accused of being gay because the berthing under us felt "harassed" :roll: by us treating the other girls in our berthing like sisters instead of like backstabbing witches) or even issue of discrimination due to sexuality. Everyone in my department accepted that we needed everyone to stand watch and being stupid about someone being gay made a person look like a toad.
There probably will be some minor problems and it is even possible that there could be a very few major incidents, but they should not be significant and they will be caused by someone not following rules already in place, not from someone just being homosexual. The best way to minimize these and ensure the repeal goes on with as few issues as possible is to ensure the chain of command stresses to their men and women that harassment of any kind, no matter someone's sexuality is not acceptable. Everyone in the military is there to do their job and everyone should be treated fairly (in regards to policy) and with respect.