- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I thought you were done with me? You can't even stomp (ha!) off in a huff very well.
You were only able to produce one post which fit your description. Seems to me if I were making a claim of "hundreds and hundreds" I'd produce more than that.
This is a lie. This is no longer a possible case of misunderstanding what they were referring to; this is intentionally dishonest. They justified subduing her, not the infamous, so-called "stomp." You lie.
Or it's possible that you really do think she was doing nothing wrong at all and shouldn't have been stopped in any way. In which case, you redefine "partisan hack."
Almost all of them said he went too far. This is another lie.
You didn't produce anything where someone called him a "hero."
In that one post, sure.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah. Cry me a river. Don't make sweeping claims you can't back up.
I told you there were hundreds to chose from. Go to the site dude. There are hundreds there.
You were only able to produce one post which fit your description. Seems to me if I were making a claim of "hundreds and hundreds" I'd produce more than that.
I reprinted exact comments from many people which indicated
1- they justified the attack
This is a lie. This is no longer a possible case of misunderstanding what they were referring to; this is intentionally dishonest. They justified subduing her, not the infamous, so-called "stomp." You lie.
Or it's possible that you really do think she was doing nothing wrong at all and shouldn't have been stopped in any way. In which case, you redefine "partisan hack."
they agreed with the attacker
Almost all of them said he went too far. This is another lie.
3- he was a hero
You didn't produce anything where someone called him a "hero."
4- she got what she deserved
5- he did nothing wrong
In that one post, sure.
It is sad to see people going through life with ideological blinders placed by themselves on their own heads. Ask me again for evidence in the future. The answer you get back will be brief and to the point.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah. Cry me a river. Don't make sweeping claims you can't back up.
Last edited: