• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

MSNBC Producer Admits "Mainstream" Media is a Cancer Amplifying Fringe Voices!

Ontologuy

Ontologuy

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,769
Reaction score
1,936
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
MSNBC producer Ariana Pekary couldn't take the "Mainstream" media cancerous liberal slant anymore and resigns with scathing revelation letter: MSNBC producer resigns from network with scathing letter: They block 'diversity of thought' and 'amplify fringe voices'.

The highlights revealed by Pekary:

1. "Mainstream" media buries important facts and studies about the coronavirus.

2. Presentation of true diversity of thought is blocked and fringe voices get amplified.

3. The upper management of "mainstream" news journalism forces good journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.

4. The decision to produce a topic or host a guest is usually based only on how it would "rate" with the viewers, not if it was truly newsworthy, and it's taboo to discuss openly how that ratings scheme distorts content in "broadcast" news. As one respectable veteran in the media therefore puts it "we are a cancer and there is no cure ...".

5. Regarding how the "mainstream" media distortion model affects coverage of both the coronavirus and recent racial unrest, "The model blocks diversity of thought and content because the networks have incentive to amplify fringe voices and events, at the expense of others, all because it pumps up the ratings."

6. The skew for ratings compels "mainstream" media to focus on deriding Trump instead of on the science itself of coronavirus and fighting it.

7. Rarely does "mainstream" media choose stories regardless of how they would rate.

8. The bottom line: "... the desire to charge more money for commercials in addition to ratings bonuses that top-tier decision-makers earn prevent the network from pursuing stories she believes the audiences should be informed about.".

9. Some producers even deny "mainstream" media producers are journalists, and one even said, "Our viewers don't really consider us the news. They come to us for comfort."

Wow! So a "mainstream" media producer finally admits what many of us have known all along: "mainstream" media outlets are simply purveyors of fake news "entertainment" for bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media!
 
Might give one hope that journalism isn't dead. Hopefully this crop of msm hacks will retire or fade away into the ether and make room for a new crop of real news people willing and able to do what they refused to do: report the damn news.
 
Yep, cable "news" is an infotainment business aimed at getting ratings (thus ad revenue) up by serving mainly confirmation bias. This is largely accomplished by simple omission as the NYT says best with its "All the news that's fit to print" slogan. The management instructs its editorial staff as what news is "fit" (appealing to them?) and they present that subset of content almost exclusively.
 
Ontologuy said:
MSNBC producer Ariana Pekary couldn't take the "Mainstream" media cancerous liberal slant anymore and resigns with scathing revelation letter: MSNBC producer resigns from network with scathing letter: They block 'diversity of thought' and 'amplify fringe voices'.

The highlights revealed by Pekary:


Wow! So a "mainstream" media producer finally admits what many of us have known all along: "mainstream" media outlets are simply purveyors of fake news "entertainment" for bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media!
Click to expand...

Wow! your OP is the parroting of FOX lies and misinformation. Everything ARIANA N. PEKARY wrote applies especially to Fox and they went ahead and proved it by the article you referenced.

Now below is the response from ARIANA N. PEKARY following Fox's b.s. misinformation where they pointed fingers but avoided the mirror and then parroted by you.

Follow up + a note about ideology ARIANA N. PEKARY

First: thank you everyone for your responses. I’m overwhelmed, surprised, and heartened by your reaction. Over the last couple of years, I was starting to think that people don’t care about the news (inside the industry or out), but you do care and that gives me enormous hope that change can and will happen. And there is no way I can do this by myself, so I welcome the moral support.

Second: I feel the need to say something about how Fox News reported my story yesterday. The reporter contacted me for an interview. To be honest, I wasn’t inclined to do an interview with Fox for all the reasons I outlined in the piece (I don’t know if I can trust them, because again, like MSNBC, their job is to rouse their audience). I hadn’t responded yet when they posted their story anyway.

As it turns out, Fox News inadvertently proved me right. My concern, clearly stated in the post, is with the entire industry because each outlet uses the same funding model. That includes Fox News, of course, but they couldn’t help but to turn my statement into a divisive piece of clickbait. The headline skewed the intention of my piece and they removed almost all of the context in which I explain the systemic nature of the problem. That is unfortunate, but not surprising.

I regret if my piece was presented as an attack on a single network, but that only gives me motivation to continue on this new path. It’s just another example of the division I’m trying to alleviate. My purpose isn’t to drive people away from the industry, but to raise awareness (as a first step). We all deserve better and we can do better.

Lastly on this point, I have to emphasize that my concerns are not ideological in nature. My concerns are economic. The flawed structure of the industry affects everyone. And that means everyone - red state, blue state, purple, whatever. My goal is to work to create a fair arena for discussion, debate, and reliable information. Thoughtful, independent voices should be promoted. I firmly believe that our democracy will not succeed otherwise.

Please keep sending your thoughts and reactions. There is so much more I have to share with you. I hope to have a plan very soon and I will let you know when that happens. You all are hungrier to address this problem than I thought.

Also please note: I am in the middle my move so I’m not yet able to respond to everyone but I will get to you. I apologize for the delay. It means a lot that you took the time to find me and to write so I will get back to you.

Thank you, all.

Ariana

Follow up + a note about ideology
 
Sand Castle said:
Wow! your OP is the parroting of FOX lies and misinformation. Everything ARIANA N. PEKARY wrote applies especially to Fox and they went ahead and proved it by the article you referenced.

Now below is the response from ARIANA N. PEKARY following Fox's b.s. misinformation where they pointed fingers but avoided the mirror and then parroted by you.

Follow up + a note about ideology ARIANA N. PEKARY

First: thank you everyone for your responses. I’m overwhelmed, surprised, and heartened by your reaction. Over the last couple of years, I was starting to think that people don’t care about the news (inside the industry or out), but you do care and that gives me enormous hope that change can and will happen. And there is no way I can do this by myself, so I welcome the moral support.

Second: I feel the need to say something about how Fox News reported my story yesterday. The reporter contacted me for an interview. To be honest, I wasn’t inclined to do an interview with Fox for all the reasons I outlined in the piece (I don’t know if I can trust them, because again, like MSNBC, their job is to rouse their audience). I hadn’t responded yet when they posted their story anyway.

As it turns out, Fox News inadvertently proved me right. My concern, clearly stated in the post, is with the entire industry because each outlet uses the same funding model. That includes Fox News, of course, but they couldn’t help but to turn my statement into a divisive piece of clickbait. The headline skewed the intention of my piece and they removed almost all of the context in which I explain the systemic nature of the problem. That is unfortunate, but not surprising.

I regret if my piece was presented as an attack on a single network, but that only gives me motivation to continue on this new path. It’s just another example of the division I’m trying to alleviate. My purpose isn’t to drive people away from the industry, but to raise awareness (as a first step). We all deserve better and we can do better.

Lastly on this point, I have to emphasize that my concerns are not ideological in nature. My concerns are economic. The flawed structure of the industry affects everyone. And that means everyone - red state, blue state, purple, whatever. My goal is to work to create a fair arena for discussion, debate, and reliable information. Thoughtful, independent voices should be promoted. I firmly believe that our democracy will not succeed otherwise.

Please keep sending your thoughts and reactions. There is so much more I have to share with you. I hope to have a plan very soon and I will let you know when that happens. You all are hungrier to address this problem than I thought.

Also please note: I am in the middle my move so I’m not yet able to respond to everyone but I will get to you. I apologize for the delay. It means a lot that you took the time to find me and to write so I will get back to you.

Thank you, all.

Ariana

Follow up + a note about ideology
Click to expand...

cough, cough,

As it turns out, Fox News inadvertently proved me right. My concern, clearly stated in the post, is with the entire industry because each outlet uses the same funding model. That includes Fox News, of course, but they couldn’t help but to turn my statement into a divisive piece of clickbait. The headline skewed the intention of my piece and they removed almost all of the context in which I explain the systemic nature of the problem. That is unfortunate, but not surprising.

I regret if my piece was presented as an attack on a single network, but that only gives me motivation to continue on this new path.
Click to expand...
 
Ontologuy said:
MSNBC producer Ariana Pekary couldn't take the "Mainstream" media cancerous liberal slant anymore and resigns with scathing revelation letter: MSNBC producer resigns from network with scathing letter: They block 'diversity of thought' and 'amplify fringe voices'.

The highlights revealed by Pekary:

1. "Mainstream" media buries important facts and studies about the coronavirus.

2. Presentation of true diversity of thought is blocked and fringe voices get amplified.

3. The upper management of "mainstream" news journalism forces good journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.

4. The decision to produce a topic or host a guest is usually based only on how it would "rate" with the viewers, not if it was truly newsworthy, and it's taboo to discuss openly how that ratings scheme distorts content in "broadcast" news. As one respectable veteran in the media therefore puts it "we are a cancer and there is no cure ...".

5. Regarding how the "mainstream" media distortion model affects coverage of both the coronavirus and recent racial unrest, "The model blocks diversity of thought and content because the networks have incentive to amplify fringe voices and events, at the expense of others, all because it pumps up the ratings."

6. The skew for ratings compels "mainstream" media to focus on deriding Trump instead of on the science itself of coronavirus and fighting it.

7. Rarely does "mainstream" media choose stories regardless of how they would rate.

8. The bottom line: "... the desire to charge more money for commercials in addition to ratings bonuses that top-tier decision-makers earn prevent the network from pursuing stories she believes the audiences should be informed about.".

9. Some producers even deny "mainstream" media producers are journalists, and one even said, "Our viewers don't really consider us the news. They come to us for comfort."

Wow! So a "mainstream" media producer finally admits what many of us have known all along: "mainstream" media outlets are simply purveyors of fake news "entertainment" for bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media!
Click to expand...

Just want to make sure I understand your: "powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media"!

So you have inside information that Fox is run by; Liberals! now that is a shock
 
Sand Castle said:
Just want to make sure I understand your: "powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media"!

So you have inside information that Fox is run by; Liberals! now that is a shock
Click to expand...
No, Sand Castle, you purposefully misconstrue as left wingers so often do when they realize they've been had. :roll:

I clearly described liberals as the "bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals!" :cool:

Face it, your left wing "mainstream" media, that means MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC, has just been exposed by another insider as the purveyors of fake news for money and advertisers' benefits.
 
Ontologuy said:
No, Sand Castle, you purposefully misconstrue as left wingers so often do when they realize they've been had. :roll:

I clearly described liberals as the "bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals!" :cool:

Face it, your left wing "mainstream" media, that means MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC, has just been exposed by another insider as the purveyors of fake news for money and advertisers' benefits.
Click to expand...

Do you consider Fox MSM? you left them off the list.

Oh by the way, your article and your articles author, just presented her words. Misconstrue?
 
Last edited:
Sand Castle said:
Do you consider Fox MSM? you left them off the list.

Oh by the way, your article and your articles author, just presented her words. Misconstrue?
Click to expand...
Irrelevant.

What matters here that's topically relevant is that Pekary, based on the substantive content of her statements that portray fake news slant toward liberals, is only talking about her set of "mainstream" media: MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, and NBC, the notorious "mainstream" media liberal-slanters.

Though Fox is part of the "Big Five", there's simply been no insider revelation that Fox is purveying fake news slanted the other way.

:cool:
 
Ontologuy said:
Irrelevant.

What matters here that's topically relevant is that Pekary, based on the substantive content of her statements that portray fake news slant toward liberals, is only talking about her set of "mainstream" media: MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, and NBC, the notorious "mainstream" media liberal-slanters.

Though Fox is part of the "Big Five", there's simply been no insider revelation that Fox is purveying fake news slanted the other way.

:cool:[/QUOTE

So you are presenting your argument off a liberal producer? Where did she say "Fake News'? But I'm glad you get your self proclaimed "Fake News" that you now claim is real news, from a liberal news producer.

By your conclusion on fake liberals, how can you possibly believe Pekary the liberal news producer?

Which way do you want it? Is MSNBC and it's people fake or not?
Click to expand...
 
First that lady from the NYT and now this. Haha. No matter, the sheep will keep believing the propaganda feed.

Baaaaahh.....Baaaaaaah..
 
Predictably, the cult is twisting the words of this person, who said the issue is NOT ideological, i.e., NOT right/left, to claim her comments were a criticism about 'liberal' media.

America has big problems with the new industry, as it has consolidated under a few megacorporations and hugely shrunk the reporting, but you can still get a lot of excellent content from the MSM and 'liberal' reporters. The cult will admit that as soon as Scientologists admit their group was created as a scam.
 


.....Media is a Cancer Amplifying Fringe Voices! :wink2:



Notice a difference.

 
Last edited:
Craig234 said:
Predictably, the cult is twisting the words of this person, who said the issue is NOT ideological, i.e., NOT right/left, to claim her comments were a criticism about 'liberal' media.

America has big problems with the new industry, as it has consolidated under a few megacorporations and hugely shrunk the reporting, but you can still get a lot of excellent content from the MSM and 'liberal' reporters. The cult will admit that as soon as Scientologists admit their group was created as a scam.
Click to expand...

It would be foolish for anyone that wishes to have a serious debate or present an article important to them to rely on opinion shows on MSNBC, Fox, CNN.

Of course MSNBC v. Fox on spinning Left v. Right no secret there. Of course I'm on the Left but rarely present anything here from MSNBC, only headlines. But then I search for cooberating evidence.

Further reading and research of journalistic articles in order to find a common thread, common facts to a story will gleen more accurate information.

The OP presents a producer from the Lawrence O'Donnell show. I have always taken his info with a grain of salt. His shoe really isn't that good and he can get fringy.

I can see why his producer became disheartened. A very similar situation happened with Shepard Smith.
 
Ontologuy said:
MSNBC producer Ariana Pekary couldn't take the "Mainstream" media cancerous liberal slant anymore and resigns with scathing revelation letter: MSNBC producer resigns from network with scathing letter: They block 'diversity of thought' and 'amplify fringe voices'.

The highlights revealed by Pekary:

1. "Mainstream" media buries important facts and studies about the coronavirus.

2. Presentation of true diversity of thought is blocked and fringe voices get amplified.

3. The upper management of "mainstream" news journalism forces good journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.

4. The decision to produce a topic or host a guest is usually based only on how it would "rate" with the viewers, not if it was truly newsworthy, and it's taboo to discuss openly how that ratings scheme distorts content in "broadcast" news. As one respectable veteran in the media therefore puts it "we are a cancer and there is no cure ...".

5. Regarding how the "mainstream" media distortion model affects coverage of both the coronavirus and recent racial unrest, "The model blocks diversity of thought and content because the networks have incentive to amplify fringe voices and events, at the expense of others, all because it pumps up the ratings."

6. The skew for ratings compels "mainstream" media to focus on deriding Trump instead of on the science itself of coronavirus and fighting it.

7. Rarely does "mainstream" media choose stories regardless of how they would rate.

8. The bottom line: "... the desire to charge more money for commercials in addition to ratings bonuses that top-tier decision-makers earn prevent the network from pursuing stories she believes the audiences should be informed about.".

9. Some producers even deny "mainstream" media producers are journalists, and one even said, "Our viewers don't really consider us the news. They come to us for comfort."

Wow! So a "mainstream" media producer finally admits what many of us have known all along: "mainstream" media outlets are simply purveyors of fake news "entertainment" for bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media!
Click to expand...

Gee, the media and BLM are evil. One producer and one activist settle all doubts.

Paranoia strikes deep.
 
Ontologuy said:
MSNBC producer Ariana Pekary couldn't take the "Mainstream" media cancerous liberal slant anymore and resigns with scathing revelation letter: MSNBC producer resigns from network with scathing letter: They block 'diversity of thought' and 'amplify fringe voices'.

The highlights revealed by Pekary:

1. "Mainstream" media buries important facts and studies about the coronavirus.

2. Presentation of true diversity of thought is blocked and fringe voices get amplified.

3. The upper management of "mainstream" news journalism forces good journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.

4. The decision to produce a topic or host a guest is usually based only on how it would "rate" with the viewers, not if it was truly newsworthy, and it's taboo to discuss openly how that ratings scheme distorts content in "broadcast" news. As one respectable veteran in the media therefore puts it "we are a cancer and there is no cure ...".

5. Regarding how the "mainstream" media distortion model affects coverage of both the coronavirus and recent racial unrest, "The model blocks diversity of thought and content because the networks have incentive to amplify fringe voices and events, at the expense of others, all because it pumps up the ratings."

6. The skew for ratings compels "mainstream" media to focus on deriding Trump instead of on the science itself of coronavirus and fighting it.

7. Rarely does "mainstream" media choose stories regardless of how they would rate.

8. The bottom line: "... the desire to charge more money for commercials in addition to ratings bonuses that top-tier decision-makers earn prevent the network from pursuing stories she believes the audiences should be informed about.".

9. Some producers even deny "mainstream" media producers are journalists, and one even said, "Our viewers don't really consider us the news. They come to us for comfort."

Wow! So a "mainstream" media producer finally admits what many of us have known all along: "mainstream" media outlets are simply purveyors of fake news "entertainment" for bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:

Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media!
Click to expand...

Amazing a fresh breeze of truth about the MSM!!!
 
Bravo to her. hopefully the moderate voters are watching, and more importantly, understanding what the left is about.
 
Ontologuy loses all credibility by considering MSNBC as similar to CNN, CBS, NBC, and ABC. It's closer to Fox News. It has some similarities to CNN, but MSNBC is more sensational than CNN, much like Fox News sensationalizes news for right-wing viewers.
 
Last edited:
Xilnik said:
Ontologuy loses all credibility by considering MSNBC as similar to CNN, CBS, NBC, and ABC. It's closer to Fox News. It has some similarities to CNN, but MSNBC is more sensational than CNN, much like Fox News sensationalizes news for right-wing viewers.
Click to expand...

CNN is absolutely NOT very much better , if at all.
 
Ontologuy said:
MSNBC producer Ariana Pekary couldn't take the "Mainstream" media cancerous liberal slant anymore and resigns with scathing revelation letter: MSNBC producer resigns from network with scathing letter: They block 'diversity of thought' and 'amplify fringe voices'.
The highlights revealed by Pekary:
...
6. The skew for ratings compels "mainstream" media to focus on deriding Trump instead of on the science itself of coronavirus and fighting it.
...
Wow! So a "mainstream" media producer finally admits what many of us have known all along: "mainstream" media outlets are simply purveyors of fake news "entertainment" for bored not-so-bright product consumers sitting at home twiddling their thumbs as outsiders looking in who are easily riled up emotionally by the behavior of powerful people in charge .. or in other words: liberals! :shock:
Yes, like the retired left wing activist who revealed that BLM is a Marxist cult fanning a race war, another insider reveals the truth, this time about "mainstream" media!
Click to expand...


Point 6 alone is the reason why the liberal media has turned to ****. Their "focus" on hating Trump - and inadvertently anyone who supports him - has turned them into purveyors of one subject only: how to destroy Trump and what he stands for.

Foreign news is hardly ever mentioned anymore, unless it can be used against Trump. Positive news about our country is being suppressed or mentioned as a tiny side note; portraying our lives in daily doom and gloom has become the new normal for the liberal press.

It's a shame that people like that MSNBC producer grow a spine only after they leave.
 
Sand Castle said:
Wow! your OP is the parroting of FOX lies and misinformation. Everything ARIANA N. PEKARY wrote applies especially to Fox and they went ahead and proved it by the article you referenced.

Now below is the response from ARIANA N. PEKARY following Fox's b.s. misinformation where they pointed fingers but avoided the mirror and then parroted by you.

Follow up + a note about ideology ARIANA N. PEKARY

First: thank you everyone for your responses. I’m overwhelmed, surprised, and heartened by your reaction. Over the last couple of years, I was starting to think that people don’t care about the news (inside the industry or out), but you do care and that gives me enormous hope that change can and will happen. And there is no way I can do this by myself, so I welcome the moral support.

Second: I feel the need to say something about how Fox News reported my story yesterday. The reporter contacted me for an interview. To be honest, I wasn’t inclined to do an interview with Fox for all the reasons I outlined in the piece (I don’t know if I can trust them, because again, like MSNBC, their job is to rouse their audience). I hadn’t responded yet when they posted their story anyway.

As it turns out, Fox News inadvertently proved me right. My concern, clearly stated in the post, is with the entire industry because each outlet uses the same funding model. That includes Fox News, of course, but they couldn’t help but to turn my statement into a divisive piece of clickbait. The headline skewed the intention of my piece and they removed almost all of the context in which I explain the systemic nature of the problem. That is unfortunate, but not surprising.

I regret if my piece was presented as an attack on a single network, but that only gives me motivation to continue on this new path. It’s just another example of the division I’m trying to alleviate. My purpose isn’t to drive people away from the industry, but to raise awareness (as a first step). We all deserve better and we can do better.

Lastly on this point, I have to emphasize that my concerns are not ideological in nature. My concerns are economic. The flawed structure of the industry affects everyone. And that means everyone - red state, blue state, purple, whatever. My goal is to work to create a fair arena for discussion, debate, and reliable information. Thoughtful, independent voices should be promoted. I firmly believe that our democracy will not succeed otherwise.

Please keep sending your thoughts and reactions. There is so much more I have to share with you. I hope to have a plan very soon and I will let you know when that happens. You all are hungrier to address this problem than I thought.

Also please note: I am in the middle my move so I’m not yet able to respond to everyone but I will get to you. I apologize for the delay. It means a lot that you took the time to find me and to write so I will get back to you.

Thank you, all.

Ariana

Follow up + a note about ideology
Click to expand...
They got to her. No doubt.
 
Hypothetical said:
CNN is absolutely NOT very much better , if at all.
Click to expand...

It depends on what spots. The actual news is factual, but it does tend to get those facts more from Democratic sources. There is far less opinion interjected by reporters compared to MSNBC or Fox News, but the questions asked are left biased.
 
A big orchid to Ms. Pekary for her courage and honesty.

Journalism used to be a noble profession. Today, as our President has said, it is the enemy of the people.

I like to think that I am not the only one who has not turned on either MSNBC or CNN for the last three years.

Of course, MSNBC gives time to that so-called "reverend," so it is beyond contempt, IMHO.
 
TheParser said:
A big orchid to Ms. Pekary for her courage and honesty.

Journalism used to be a noble profession. Today, as our President has said, it is the enemy of the people.

I like to think that I am not the only one who has not turned on either MSNBC or CNN for the last three years.

Of course, MSNBC gives time to that so-called "reverend," so it is beyond contempt, IMHO.
Click to expand...

You obviously don't watch Fox then. Curious if you watch any televised News?
 
Sand Castle said:
You obviously don't watch Fox then. Curious if you watch any televised News?
Click to expand...

I do watch Fox, MSNBC and very rarely CNN. One huge difference with Fox is that on virtually every show I've watched, they have a liberal to present a liberal point of view. I have never, not once, seen a conservative on an MSNBC. Literally never. They will have a panel of four guests who range from slightly liberal to off the rails loon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom