I call BS on that. What "things" specifically?
Well, lets do "the IRS conspired against conservative nonporfit applicants."
What really happened is in response to a deluge of applications for 501(c)(4) status post the Citizens United decision, IRS workers used search words instead of actually doing their jobs and checking each as they are supposed to.
It's all in the IG report on the issue.
He said, to paraphrase, that using search words resulted in applicants who should have been approved not being and some who should have been denied got approved. That it was the IRS departments job to verify that every applicant is on the up and up.l, jot to use arbitrary terms to screen them.
Now, why were there so many 501(c)(4) applications? Why didn't they just do 526, which is the political nonprofit class? 501(c)(4) is also not tax deductible, but only permits 49% of donations to be used for electioneering. 526 can spend 100%.
Because 501(c)(4) confers donor anonymity, 526 does not.
Now there were more conservative groups that got caught up in this. But there were far more applications from conservative groups trying to get anonymity for their donors.
These are the facts in the case.
But y'all believe that Obama had the IRS "silence" conservatives.
But 502(c)(4) is not supposed to he "primarily political". An IRS beaurocrat interpreted the law to mean not more than 49% could be spent on electioneering. The "political" cutout was so say a bicycle rider group could spend some money lobbying for bike lanes, very specific activity directly related to their charter. 526 exists to be the political nonprofit class.
So there's one.
There are more.