• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rachel Maddow Wins Dismissal of OAN Defamation Lawsuit

azgreg

Chicks dig the long ball
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
25,240
Reaction score
24,034
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Rachel Maddow Wins Dismissal of OAN Defamation Lawsuit

A federal judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit filed against Rachel Maddow, finding she did not defame One America News when she said it was “Russian propaganda.”

Herring Networks, the parent company of OAN, claimed that Maddow had defamed the company in July 2019, when she discussed a Daily Beast article reporting that an OAN contributor was also on the payroll of Sputnik, a Kremlin-backed news site.

Maddow should absolutely seek attorney fees from OAN.
 
Love her hair where does she get it done?
 
Love her hair where does she get it done?

Solid contribution to the forum. Arguably your best work.

tenor.gif
 
Rachel Maddow Wins Dismissal of OAN Defamation Lawsuit



Maddow should absolutely seek attorney fees from OAN.

If an OAN contributor is working for Sputnik, they are working for The Kremlin.
Both Sputnik AND Russia Today are organs of The Kremlin, these are facts.

I am surprised the judge did not penalize OAN for vexatious litigation, and I suspect the next time OAN tries a stunt like this, that is exactly what will happen.
 
Sorry I've been without a haircut for two months now and it's getting to me. I didn't mean any disrespect to Ms. or Mr. Maddow not sure which gender is preferred.

unnamed.jpg
 
They've proven over and over they have no bottom.

They hate commentators that have actual degrees and experience.
 
Sorry I've been without a haircut for two months now and it's getting to me. I didn't mean any disrespect to Ms. or Mr. Maddow not sure which gender is preferred.
You seem to be proud of your ignorant and ponderous posts. You are the only one...
 
Defamation is very, very difficult to win in the United States.

If Elon Musk can get away with what he did, OAN had no chance.

The issue for most people though, is there's no way they could afford to defend themselves against organizations like OAN and very wealthy people which is where anti-SLAPP laws came from but there are still many states that do not have anti-SLAPP legislation on the books which is worrying, but in Maddows case, the case was in California and so the case was dismissed with anti-SLAPP which means she can and should I think, seek those attorney fees.
 
They hate commentators that have actual degrees and experience.

They hate subject matter experts for some reason. I don't get it. These are important things and they refuse to believe the experts. However, if they need to get their El Camino fixed or one of their three teeth cleaned you know damn well they will see a subject matter expert.
 
You seem to be proud of your ignorant and ponderous posts. You are the only one...

Not so much proud as defiant. I'd like to be remembered as someone who wasn't afraid to speak back to power.
 
Sorry I've been without a haircut for two months now and it's getting to me. I didn't mean any disrespect to Ms. or Mr. Maddow not sure which gender is preferred.

View attachment 67281342

You didn’t seem to have a problem when you addressed her as “her” earlier, re: the hair comment.

I think you were trying to be funny and it fell flat. Then you just dug yourself in deeper.

You’re not funny. Don’t quit your day job.
 
If an OAN contributor is working for Sputnik, they are working for The Kremlin.
Both Sputnik AND Russia Today are organs of The Kremlin, these are facts.

I am surprised the judge did not penalize OAN for vexatious litigation, and I suspect the next time OAN tries a stunt like this, that is exactly what will happen.

Russia Today has hired plenty of people who are outspoken critics of Russia, like Abby Martin for example. You can criticize Russia and keep your job at RT.

The Russian paranoia is just about played out however. When are the cowards who sought a new cold war with Russia going to show the slightest bit of consistency, and place responsibility for 100k victims of coronavirus with China?
 
Russia Today has hired plenty of people who are outspoken critics of Russia, like Abby Martin for example. You can criticize Russia and keep your job at RT.

The Russian paranoia is just about played out however. When are the cowards who sought a new cold war with Russia going to show the slightest bit of consistency, and place responsibility for 100k victims of coronavirus with China?

Are you denying that RT is owned and operated by The Kremlin?
Oh please please PLEASE TAAC, please say that you don't believe that it's an organ of The Kremlin.

Here's a great big blank space where you can scrawl your disbelief:







*****************************************
 
Not so much proud as defiant. I'd like to be remembered as someone who wasn't afraid to speak back to power.

So, you think that making ignorant, 3rd grade level posts that are incredibly stupid is speaking back to power?
 
So, you think that making ignorant, 3rd grade level posts that are incredibly stupid is speaking back to power?

Don't get upset I wear my ineffective mask when I go to the grocery store just like the rest of you sheeple. It's my way of bowing to the powers that be.
 
Back
Top Bottom