• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chuck Todd on MTP edits Barr interview to present false criticism.

Tanngrisnir said:
The second part of that quote is quite irrelevant to the first part, given that Barr in a known pathological liar, partisan operative and hatchetman for twump.

Yet another undies-soiling nothing burger from and for the orange cult.
Click to expand...

This is incredible. NBC can admit that the interview was edited in a deceptive way and apologize, but a hack still thinks the edited video was accurate.
 
lurchadams said:
Your CBS interview link doesn't work. The bottom line is: Flynn lied. He pleaded guilty twice. Barr can say the "rule of law was upheld" but that's a lie as well. Barr's DoJ is simply the mango menace's political weapon. And Barr was gloating weather you care to admit it or not.
Click to expand...

The law allows the DOJ to ask to dismiss a case. A judge will decide. So thats rule of law. This is all dumb anyway since FLynn is just the scapegoat in the whole affair. The FBI lied, the media lied, Dems lied, Flynn lied. The whole thing is political, so justice is Flynn has been punished enough for something that never should have happened.
 
Grim17 said:
Chuck Todd, host of Meet The Press has become an embarrassment to Sunday morning political shows. Tim Russert must be spinning in his grave.

From the Blaze:



Sorry to disappoint all you biased media deniers and TDS sufferers, but there's no attacking the source in order to dismiss this one:

Meet The Press clip

Barr's full answer from CBS interview.

.
Click to expand...

lurchadams said:
Your CBS interview link doesn't work. The bottom line is: Flynn lied. He pleaded guilty twice. Barr can say the "rule of law was upheld" but that's a lie as well. Barr's DoJ is simply the mango menace's political weapon. And Barr was gloating weather you care to admit it or not.
Click to expand...

It's also the kind of irrelevant thing Grim17 would pretend matters in order to score a dishonest point on the internet.

What matters is what Barr did, as you note, and not what he said or how much of what he said someone played in a clip.
Whatcha gonna do. :shrug:
 
Tahuyaman said:
This is incredible. NBC can admit that the interview was edited in a deceptive way and apologize, but a hack still thinks the edited video was accurate.
Click to expand...

The Trump haters don't care if the media lies, and what's worse is that they are now lying to protect Chuck Todd.
 
ChezC3 said:
When NBC doctored the 911 call of Zimmerman to falsely give credibility to the racism narrative they were perpetuating for Obama's reelection bid, that told me all I needed to know about the integrity of that organization.

They're scum.
Click to expand...

Journalistic integrity has been collapsing faster then a Jenga tower in the last 15 or so years.
 
Grim17 said:
Chuck Todd, host of Meet The Press has become an embarrassment to Sunday morning political shows. Tim Russert must be spinning in his grave.

From the Blaze:



Sorry to disappoint all you biased media deniers and TDS sufferers, but there's no attacking the source in order to dismiss this one:

Meet The Press clip

Barr's full answer from CBS interview.

.
Click to expand...

This is how emboldened the msdnc media has become. They have the Dems' back and the Dems have theirs.
 
jamesbyoung said:
What about it, my friend? We are laughing at the credulity of you running around yelling "we have a Blaze, we have a Blaze."
Click to expand...

Apparently, WaPo is saying the exact same thing the Blaze did. So how about you comment on the topic instead of trying to murder the message with a falsity that borders on a lie.

Secondly, I have posted one time to present a second source, I said nothing about the Blaze. The only blaze I want is to burn your stupid posts with.
 
Last edited:
jamesbyoung said:
The embarrassment is that you used The Blaze.
Click to expand...

What does it matter what the OP used? It's a fact and while no one can prove it was done on purpose to deceive in order to further their agenda, that's exactly what happened.
Not you'd want to address that?
 
OpportunityCost said:
You guys are ridiculous. The blaze, the blaze, the blaze. How about the Washington Post?



Examine what happened, quit shooting the messenger, quit trolling, quit ads homs and at least TRY to have a reasonable conversation.

You aren't exchanging ideas as much as you are dismissing and doing everything you can to shut down the message and the messenger.
Click to expand...


It’s not about exchanging ideas, it’s about shutting down any discussion of the actual topic by deflecting to the source. I mean seriously, it’s a recorded show, everything presented by the OP is in the public domain. People wishing to have an honest discussion of the issue presented could certainly find other sources to their liking. Instead, they choose the intellectually lazy path of shooting the messenger and pretending that THAT is the real issue. It’s bull****.
 
Excon said:
Wrong as usual.

Chuck Todd lied to the viewers.
Click to expand...

I think Todd lied, deceived and generally attempted to dupe his audience who he thinks is SO profoundly stupid that they wouldn't ever learn that he edited the footage in order to accuse Barr of not addressing the rule of law.
Instead of being insulted, most of the leftist masses who waste their time watching his never-Trump rhetoric will just shrug their shoulders and wait for the next bunch of lies to swallow and crap out all over social media.
 
OpportunityCost said:
You guys are ridiculous. The blaze, the blaze, the blaze. How about the Washington Post?



Examine what happened, quit shooting the messenger, quit trolling, quit ads homs and at least TRY to have a reasonable conversation.

You aren't exchanging ideas as much as you are dismissing and doing everything you can to shut down the message and the messenger.
Click to expand...


Their elitism is really something, isn't it? The WaPo isn't fit to line a bird cage.
 
trixare4kids said:
The Trump haters don't care if the media lies, and what's worse is that they are now lying to protect Chuck Todd.
Click to expand...

They'd do the same for Don Lemon in a Hamptons bar.
 
Moon said:
It’s not about exchanging ideas, it’s about shutting down any discussion of the actual topic by deflecting to the source. I mean seriously, it’s a recorded show, everything presented by the OP is in the public domain. People wishing to have an honest discussion of the issue presented could certainly find other sources to their liking. Instead, they choose the intellectually lazy path of shooting the messenger and pretending that THAT is the real issue. It’s bull****.
Click to expand...

Because they are intellectually lazy.
 
Acadia said:
I think Todd lied, deceived and generally attempted to dupe his audience who he thinks is SO profoundly stupid that they wouldn't ever learn that he edited the footage in order to accuse Barr of not addressing the rule of law.
Instead of being insulted, most of the leftist masses who waste their time watching his never-Trump rhetoric will just shrug their shoulders and wait for the next bunch of lies to swallow and crap out all over social media.
Click to expand...

Of course he did... His comments were pre-written. You could tell by the way he introduced it that he already decided what he was going to say, which of course would have been invalid if he played his entire answer.

.
 
Mr Person said:
It's also the kind of irrelevant thing Grim17 would pretend matters in order to score a dishonest point on the internet.

What matters is what Barr did, as you note, and not what he said or how much of what he said someone played in a clip.
Whatcha gonna do. :shrug:
Click to expand...

"NBC’s “Meet the Press” responded late Sunday in a tweet acknowledging that the network “inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip.”"

Chuck Todd accused of 'deceptive editing' William Barr NBC interview, DOJ say - Washington Times

But yeah, let's trust the people who always lie to defend Fox and lie to attack any left-lean media that it was all a terribly important and deliberate conspiracy.

:roll:
 
Mr Person said:

"NBC’s “Meet the Press” responded late Sunday in a tweet acknowledging that the network “inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip.”"

Chuck Todd accused of 'deceptive editing' William Barr NBC interview, DOJ say - Washington Times

But yeah, let's trust the people who always lie to defend Fox and lie to attack any left-lean media that it was all a terribly important and deliberate conspiracy.

:roll:
Click to expand...

Your need to attack those you disagree with is so obsessive, that you quote yourself in order to do so...

LMMFAO
 
Mr Person said:

"NBC’s “Meet the Press” responded late Sunday in a tweet acknowledging that the network “inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip.”"

Chuck Todd accused of 'deceptive editing' William Barr NBC interview, DOJ say - Washington Times

But yeah, let's trust the people who always lie to defend Fox and lie to attack any left-lean media that it was all a terribly important and deliberate conspiracy.

:roll:
Click to expand...


Anything past AG Barr’s chuckle as he was asked the “what will history say.....” question is irrelevant, imo.
 
wellwisher said:
General Flynn will now be able to sue a wide range of Democrats, both in government, and in fake news, for willful damage to his reputation. The huge cash settlements may help fake news get back on track. It can now be proven, that General Flynn's treatment was all part of a larger scam to take down the President. Top level Obama Democrats, under oath, admitted there was never anything to the accusations of collusion, other than as a pretense for treason.

When Barr said the winners write history, he was talking about the Trump administration and Republicans, who are now in control of the scandal. The liars and con artists of the DNC , are setting up their last defense. but can no longer be able to control the narrative. This shows that the American people have become tired of their lies and promises.

This document dump did not come out until all the documents were declassified. If you read between the lines, this means that a lot of people must have known these things, for some time. If you had access to classified information, you already knew these things for several years. Yet, the politicians on both side allowed this to play out with only the liars leaking bad intel. The good intel was kept quiet and not leaked.

It makes me wonder if Trump has been the puppet master, of the puppet master; Obama. The president has the authority to declassify anything, which means he would have access to anything, so he can make that determination. Which means he knew al about this data for quite some time. He chose to keep it quiet and wait for the right time to act; 2020 election.

I can see a Republican campaign strategy, where they play the CNN and PMSNBC video lies of Democrats, from each state, to impact state elections. Biden will also have to answer for his role in the plot. I am not sure if an indicted criminal can run for president. Trump said even better data will be released soon.
Click to expand...

Don't worry about Biden, he has a legitimate excuse for not knowing anything that went on. I honestly believe him every time he says he does not remember.
 
Mr Person said:

"NBC’s “Meet the Press” responded late Sunday in a tweet acknowledging that the network “inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip.”"

Chuck Todd accused of 'deceptive editing' William Barr NBC interview, DOJ say - Washington Times

But yeah, let's trust the people who always lie to defend Fox and lie to attack any left-lean media that it was all a terribly important and deliberate conspiracy.

:roll:
Click to expand...

LOL.....yeah right!

They were only hoping that they didn't get called out for it.

And, you show up right in time to carry their water.
 
It's also the kind of irrelevant thing Grim17 would pretend matters in order to score a dishonest point on the internet.

What matters is what Barr did, as you note, and not what he said or how much of what he said someone played in a clip.
Whatcha gonna do.

______________
It's also the kind of irrelevant thing Grim17 would pretend matters in order to score a dishonest point on the internet.

What matters is what Barr did, as you note, and not what he said or how much of what he said someone played in a clip.
Whatcha gonna do. :shrug:[/QUOTE]

"NBC’s “Meet the Press” responded late Sunday in a tweet acknowledging that the network “inadvertently and inaccurately cut short a video clip.”"

Chuck Todd accused of 'deceptive editing' William Barr NBC interview, DOJ say - Washington Times

But yeah, let's trust the people who always lie to defend Fox and lie to attack any left-lean media that it was all a terribly important and deliberate conspiracy.
________________




Grim17 said:
Your need to attack those you disagree with is so obsessive, that you quote yourself in order to do so...

LMMFAO
Click to expand...

Try as you might to make me the subject, I'm not. Post is still there if you want to try to have your first honest exchange on DP.

PS: 'member when you defended Trump from sexual assault allegations, lied about it, demanded proof that you did, and then when the proof was shown you ran away spitting cowardly insults over your back? I 'member that. And because I do, I will be more than a little surprised if you ever do honestly address the subject.

:lol:

RetiredUSN said:
LOL.....yeah right!

They were only hoping that they didn't get called out for it.

And, you show up right in time to carry their water.
Click to expand...

Psssst: I'm not the subject of the thread.
 
Last edited:
Grim17 said:
Of course he did... His comments were pre-written. You could tell by the way he introduced it that he already decided what he was going to say, which of course would have been invalid if he played his entire answer.

.
Click to expand...

If Todd didn't know the clip was edited to deceive, we'd have heard about a producer being fired. But we haven't. Anyone who purposefully does that to on-air talent would have been escorted out of the building immediately.
So yeah, Todd is SO desperate that he needs to manufacture scandals upon which to push the Left's agenda.
They are spiraling because they know Biden sucks as a candidate, and Obamagate is blowing up.
 
Grim17 said:
So your answer is that they did so to get a conviction.

Are you ok with law enforcement asking questions of people for the sole purpose of manufacturing a crime?

I'm not ok with that at all. Law enforcement's job is to investigate crimes, not create them.... It's just plain wrong and for me that belief is universal, regardless of the political affiliation of the person they're questioning. As we've learned from the Tara Reade allegations, and the release of the congressional transcripts, right and wrong for most people on the left is a judgement made based on political consequences.

.
Click to expand...

The crime was not manufactured. Flynn was guilty, not only of lying to the VP and to the FBI, but was also working as a foreign agent which was a huge conflict of interest.
 
jamesbyoung View Post
What about it, my friend? We are laughing at the credulity of you running around yelling "we have a Blaze, we have a Blaze."

OpportunityCost said:
Apparently, WaPo is saying the exact same thing the Blaze did. So how about you comment on the topic instead of trying to murder the message with a falsity that borders on a lie.

Secondly, I have posted one time to present a second source, I said nothing about the Blaze. The only blaze I want is to burn your stupid posts with.
Click to expand...

Now you project your almost falsity onto me? And you mischaracterize what WaPo says? Your argumentum ad ignorantum is noted.
 
trixare4kids said:
The Trump haters don't care if the media lies, and what's worse is that they are now lying to protect Chuck Todd.
Click to expand...

Too funny. I still can’t figure out why NBC put Chuck Todd on Meet the Press after the legacy built by Tim Russert and his predecessors. Chuck Todd is not a serious guy. He’s a hack. They may as well replace him with Rachel Maddow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom