• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

++ Hardly true. When Trump’s rich friends were pushing for the recent tax cuts favoring them, permanent ones for corporations, temporary for people, they were practicing class identity politics, not Marxism. When middle class folks like myself push for mortgage interest deductions, a subsidy to me unavailable to poorer renters, we are pushing middle class identity politics, not Das Kapital. When poor people advocate for food stamps, or recently for a lower rate loans to fight economic losses due to the virus, they are pushing poorer class identity politics. Nothing new here. “Class,” however, remains a forbidden word in US politics. And the forbidders have cried “Marxism” when someone uses it

Marxists were never so called Liberals. What is more, Democrats are not so called Liberals. They are authoritarians.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

Marxists were never so called Liberals. What is more, Democrats are not so called Liberals. They are authoritarians.

Authoritarians? It was not Obama who said I can do anything I want. It was not democrats that bragged about molesting women without consequence, acted like a lynch mob leader with the Central Park Five, spread lies about black crime, fired an attorney general who properly recused himself, recently fired a guy who reported the Ukraine affair, demands personal loyalty, not loyalty to the Constitution, and of course, expressed support for some of the world’s biggest authoritarians, envying their power. Trump is a mini Mussolini, with a dash of Foghorn Leghorn thrown in. Democrats, like republicans, tend to believe in the rule of law. Trump believes that no rules apply to him, dating back to his Trump University and Trump Foundation days. Doesn’t mean that he can’t be a good conservative President, but own the fact that he is an authoritarian.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

That's what I was taught in school too Tigerace. But then a Muslim friend of mine gave me a book to read, and I did. The book was written by an American, and it exposed the history of communism that I'd never heard before. I'd seen the Che Guevara t shirts on campus, and had a roommate who had the hammer and sickle flag, but this book blew my mind. It chronicled the foundations of communism, and the 80 million victims of communism. It also demonstrated the many lies and errors that had been told about Germany, and painted a clear picture of the true goal of the NSDAP regime, which was to eradicate communism from Europe.
all of which just goes to show your incapacity to read anything with even the remotest effort at applying critical thinking.
They also liberated Finland and Poland from Soviet occupation, helped Spain defeat communism, and worked at stamping out the exploitation of the German people.
What a load of tripe.

Poland wasn't Soviet occupied at the time that Hitler invaded it and neither was Finland.

Your ignorance of historical events defies any description and is surpassed only by the lies you use to fill the astounding vacuum of knowledge that you constantly display.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

Marxists were never so called Liberals. What is more, Democrats are not so called Liberals. They are authoritarians.

Derp.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

Frank was represented at trial by 8 jewish attorneys, who should have had no problem casting doubt on the testimony of one black man, had that black man been lying. The jury would have been white at that time, and prejudice against blacks was rampant in Georgia. Yet something else occurred;

Conley was cross-examined by the defense for 16 hours over three days, but the defense failed to break his story. The defense then moved to have Conley's entire testimony concerning the alleged rendezvous stricken from the record.

In spite of the efforts of eight jewish attorneys to break Conley during 16 hours of testimony, they couldn't. And remember RN, Conley didn't claim to be innocent here; he admitted to his part in moving the body, and served his prison sentence. The prosecution claimed that Frank's attorneys then tried to bribe their way out of the trial.

During the trial, the prosecution alleged bribery and witness tampering attempts by the Frank legal team.

Was Alonzo Mann paid money to change his sworn testimony 69 years later? It certainly fits with the character of those involved, and Mann's sudden change in testimony was the basis for the ADL seeking to obtain a posthumous pardon with exoneration for Frank. They have no evidence of Leo Frank's innocence, their only interest was in whitewashing the history of the ADL, an organization that should have been declared illegal long ago for spying on Americans and committing all sorts of unscrupulous behaviors in their quest to extort America.


Leo Frank - Wikipedia

70 years later, for what purpose? And the kid didnt change his story, he never got to tell his story because he kept what he saw secret.

Just because someone doesnt change their story (Conley) doesnt mean they arent lying. You are assuming that those jurors wouldn't also have antisemitic sentiments, and that being able to convict a Jew wouldn't appeal to them.

The prosecution "alleged". What evidence did they have?

You haven't provided evidence to support this.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

70 years later, for what purpose? And the kid didnt change his story, he never got to tell his story because he kept what he saw secret.

Just because someone doesnt change their story (Conley) doesnt mean they arent lying. You are assuming that those jurors wouldn't also have antisemitic sentiments, and that being able to convict a Jew wouldn't appeal to them.

The prosecution "alleged". What evidence did they have?

You haven't provided evidence to support this.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

The only time a Nazi believes a black man is when he can hang a Jew.

The Frank Leo cases proves that point.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

70 years later, for what purpose?

The ADL was founded to 'stop the defamation of the jewish people', specifically because of Leo Frank's case. Frank was lynched because he was convicted of killing 14 year old Mary Phagan and sentenced to death, but only two years after the conviction, a judge who had ties to Frank commuted his sentence, and he was sent to a light work farm. People in Georgia felt that Frank had successfully corrupted both Mary Phagan, and the system.

And the kid didnt change his story, he never got to tell his story because he kept what he saw secret.

That's incorrect. Alonzo Mann testified during the trial. He was Leo Frank's office assistant in 1913.

Just because someone doesnt change their story (Conley) doesnt mean they arent lying.

Read it again, and this time think about the significance of the fact that 8 attorneys couldn't find one single lie during 16 hours of questioning Conley. So they asked the judge to throw Conley's testimony out. Conley had a third grade education, yet 8 trained attorneys couldn't penetrate his version of events, which doesn't suggest that he was lying.

You are assuming that those jurors wouldn't also have antisemitic sentiments, and that being able to convict a Jew wouldn't appeal to them.

And you are assuming that 12 jurors were antisemitic, which is ridiculous. The racism and discrimination against a black man in 1913 Georgia would be much more severe than prejudice against someone who appeared to be white like Frank, and was college educated and middle class.


The prosecution "alleged". What evidence did they have?

Given the fact that one of Frank's lawyers shared a business with Governor John Slaton, the man who commuted Frank's sentence in 1915, he definitely had the benefit of Jewish money behind him. The Jewish community was desperately trying to prove that one of theres wasn't a serial rapist, which isn't something they bother with today after Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, Jared Fogle, have been convicted of sex crimes.

You haven't provided evidence to support this.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

In this country, an accused person is innocent until proven guilty by a jury. Leo Frank was convicted by a jury for the rape and murder of 14 year old Mary Phagan. The burden of proof is now on you, if you're saying that Frank was innocent.
 
Last edited:
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

That's what I was taught in school too Tigerace. But then a Muslim friend of mine gave me a book to read, and I did. The book was written by an American, and it exposed the history of communism that I'd never heard before. I'd seen the Che Guevara t shirts on campus, and had a roommate who had the hammer and sickle flag, but this book blew my mind. It chronicled the foundations of communism, and the 80 million victims of communism. It also demonstrated the many lies and errors that had been told about Germany, and painted a clear picture of the true goal of the NSDAP regime, which was to eradicate communism from Europe.

They also liberated Finland and Poland from Soviet occupation, helped Spain defeat communism, and worked at stamping out the exploitation of the German people.

The real goal of the NSDAP was the subjugation of the Untermenschen to provide liebensraum for the expansion of the Third Reich and the elimination of the Jewish people. If it were solely to defeat Communism why use the Einsatzgruppen and later to expend the capital and resources rounding up Jews and shipping them to extermination camps?
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

The real goal of the NSDAP was the subjugation of the Untermenschen to provide liebensraum for the expansion of the Third Reich and the elimination of the Jewish people.

That is a hoary lie. The NSDAP existed for 21 years prior to the start of the holocaust. Their primary opponent throughout the 1920s, and much of the 1930s, was Communism, and the many attempts by communists to seek a hostile takeover of Germany, Austria, and Hungary.

If it were solely to defeat Communism why use the Einsatzgruppen and later to expend the capital and resources rounding up Jews and shipping them to extermination camps?

As previously noted, jews, particularly Eastern European jews, were disproportionately represented in the communist parties of every European country, and here in the US as well. The exclusion of immigrants from Eastern Europe that was included in the 1924 Immigration Bill was really an attempt to keep Eastern European jews from gaining numbers in the US, and forming communist parties for the purpose of effecting communist takeover of America, as they had done in Russia, and tried to do in Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

That is a hoary lie. The NSDAP existed for 21 years prior to the start of the holocaust.

And Mein Kamph , written in 1923, discusses exactly what I said.

Their primary opponent throughout the 1920s, and much of the 1930s, was Communism, and the many attempts by communists to seek a hostile takeover of Germany, Austria, and Hungary

Communists.... And Jews. And intellectuals. And Jews. And Slavs. And Jews.

As previously noted, jews, particularly Eastern European jews, were disproportionately represented in the communist parties of every European country, and here in the US as well.

As far as the USSR is concerned Jews were pretty much purged by the 1930s... The whole "Bolshevik Jew" nonsense was a lie.

The exclusion of immigrants from Eastern Europe that was included in the 1924 Immigration Bill was really an attempt to keep Eastern European jews from gaining numbers in the US, and forming communist parties for the purpose of effecting communist takeover of America, as they had done in Russia, and tried to do in Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy.

FFS.... The quota provided immigration visas to two percent of the total number of people of each nationality in the United States as of the 1890 national census.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

And Mein Kamph , written in 1923, discusses exactly what I said.



Communists.... And Jews. And intellectuals. And Jews. And Slavs. And Jews.



As far as the USSR is concerned Jews were pretty much purged by the 1930s... The whole "Bolshevik Jew" nonsense was a lie.



FFS.... The quota provided immigration visas to two percent of the total number of people of each nationality in the United States as of the 1890 national census.
Lmao. His understanding of history is disastrous.

Just.... Soft, soft stuff.

Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

The ADL was founded to 'stop the defamation of the jewish people', specifically because of Leo Frank's case. Frank was lynched because he was convicted of killing 14 year old Mary Phagan and sentenced to death, but only two years after the conviction, a judge who had ties to Frank commuted his sentence, and he was sent to a light work farm. People in Georgia felt that Frank had successfully corrupted both Mary Phagan, and the system.



That's incorrect. Alonzo Mann testified during the trial. He was Leo Frank's office assistant in 1913.



Read it again, and this time think about the significance of the fact that 8 attorneys couldn't find one single lie during 16 hours of questioning Conley. So they asked the judge to throw Conley's testimony out. Conley had a third grade education, yet 8 trained attorneys couldn't penetrate his version of events, which doesn't suggest that he was lying.



And you are assuming that 12 jurors were antisemitic, which is ridiculous. The racism and discrimination against a black man in 1913 Georgia would be much more severe than prejudice against someone who appeared to be white like Frank, and was college educated and middle class.




Given the fact that one of Frank's lawyers shared a business with Governor John Slaton, the man who commuted Frank's sentence in 1915, he definitely had the benefit of Jewish money behind him. The Jewish community was desperately trying to prove that one of theres wasn't a serial rapist, which isn't something they bother with today after Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, Jared Fogle, have been convicted of sex crimes.



In this country, an accused person is innocent until proven guilty by a jury. Leo Frank was convicted by a jury for the rape and murder of 14 year old Mary Phagan. The burden of proof is now on you, if you're saying that Frank was innocent.
That is what you claim. However, you seem to not be able to get info correct. Who commuted Frank's sentence? First you said it was a judge, and then the governor (who it was). And the kid's testimony (he was a teenager) was insignificant information when made at the trial. He wasn't asked any sort of questions that would have been directly about the murder or what he could have (did) see, according to what he claimed. Do you have a transcript of questions he was asked at trial?

Number of lawyers does not determine whether a person is found guilty or innocent. In fact it could easily work against a defendant, especially if the jury already views "his type" as rich men with privilege. Both sides played on the prejudices of the jury against blacks, with the prosecutor playing the more commonly held one that a black man didnt have enough intelligence to come up with a story like that, so he must be telling the truth.

Are you claiming juries are never wrong?

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

Yes, but did Soros pretend he could run the federal government and kill over 10,000 U.S. citizens. No! Only Trump does that through his corruption and incompetence.Look at the big picture if you possibly have the ability. What this thread says about Soros is inconsequential in the big picture, what this thread says about those who think its important is that they are pea wits. Keep watching Fox News and stay on your brilliant self-extinction strategies, those are the only ones left for you to follow anymore! I invite you to watch the Presidential Pig steal the treasure of the USA for his own benefit!
 
Re: George Soros Funded J

That is what you claim. However, you seem to not be able to get info correct. Who commuted Frank's sentence? First you said it was a judge, and then the governor (who it was). And the kid's testimony (he was a teenager) was insignificant information when made at the trial. He wasn't asked any sort of questions that would have been directly about the murder or what he could have (did) see, according to what he claimed. Do you have a transcript of questions he was asked at trial?

Lol, you didn't know that Alonzo Mann (the 'kid' you keep referring to) testified at Frank's trial, yet you bring up a typo that I made. I don't think you've researched the case, and you're using me to provide you with facts about the trial. The transcript of Mann's testimony is online.

Number of lawyers does not determine whether a person is found guilty or innocent. In fact it could easily work against a defendant, especially if the jury already views "his type" as rich men with privilege. Both sides played on the prejudices of the jury against blacks, with the prosecutor playing the more commonly held one that a black man didnt have enough intelligence to come up with a story like that, so he must be telling the truth.

That's bogus- we know that justice in the United States favors the rich, as they have the money to afford attorneys that aren't available for the poor to access. Jeffrey Epstein's wealth afforded him dozens of attorneys, like Alan Dershowitz, who successfully bargained for a light jail sentence. A poor man who has dozens of underage girls accusing him of rape isn't going to fair so well in an American criminal court. And the business connections of one of Frank's attorneys was the reason his death sentence was commuted.

Conley did in fact have a third grade education. The defense, and the ADL, have always presented Jim Conley as a base character, guzzling alcohol and engaging in low brow behavior. They are the ones who exploited a harmful stereotype, not the prosecution.

Are you claiming juries are never wrong?

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

Leo Frank was never exonerated, in 107 years since the crime occurred. Juries sometimes get it wrong, but Leo Frank's conviction stands- he's a murderer. Are you saying you have proof that Leo Frank was wrongfully convicted? Then by all means please present your version of events that will finally earn Frank a legal exoneration.
 
Last edited:
Re: George Soros Funded J

Lol, you didn't know that Alonzo Mann (the 'kid' you keep referring to) testified at Frank's trial, yet you bring up a typo that I made. I don't think you've researched the case, and you're using me to provide you with facts about the trial. The transcript of Mann's testimony is online.



That's bogus- we know that justice in the United States favors the rich, as they have the money to afford attorneys that aren't available for the poor to access. Jeffrey Epstein's wealth afforded him dozens of attorneys, like Alan Dershowitz, who successfully bargained for a light jail sentence. A poor man who has dozens of underage girls accusing him of rape isn't going to fair so well in an American criminal court. And the business connections of one of Frank's attorneys was the reason his death sentence was commuted.

Conley did in fact have a third grade education. The defense, and the ADL, have always presented Jim Conley as a base character, guzzling alcohol and engaging in low brow behavior. They are the ones who exploited a harmful stereotype, not the prosecution.



Leo Frank was never exonerated, in 107 years since the crime occurred. Juries sometimes get it wrong, but Leo Frank's conviction stands- he's a murderer. Are you saying you have proof that Leo Frank was wrongfully convicted? Then by all means please present your version of events that will finally earn Frank a legal exoneration.

I never said he didnt testify at the trial. It was in the story I linked to that he did, but that they only asked him a few, general questions that had little to nothing to do with the actual murder, timeline. If you have some other evidence that they asked him something else, much more relevant, that he lied about, or a transcript of the questioning, provide it.

I'm saying that there is plenty of doubt in his case and being rich does not mean others dont have some bias against you.

I stated both sides used racial stereotypes pertaining to Conley. The prosecution fed the jury into believing Conley could not have thought to blame someone else because of his 3rd grade education. Not being education does not mean people cannot make up stories to blame someone else, can't lie brilliantly.

Cameron Todd Williams has not been exonerated after his execution either, yet we have plenty of evidence that there was much more reasonable doubt about him. Not being exonerated does not mean those jury members got it correct.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Re: George Soros Funded J

Lol, you didn't know that Alonzo Mann (the 'kid' you keep referring to) testified at Frank's trial, yet you bring up a typo that I made. I don't think you've researched the case, and you're using me to provide you with facts about the trial. The transcript of Mann's testimony is online.



That's bogus- we know that justice in the United States favors the rich, as they have the money to afford attorneys that aren't available for the poor to access. Jeffrey Epstein's wealth afforded him dozens of attorneys, like Alan Dershowitz, who successfully bargained for a light jail sentence. A poor man who has dozens of underage girls accusing him of rape isn't going to fair so well in an American criminal court. And the business connections of one of Frank's attorneys was the reason his death sentence was commuted.

Conley did in fact have a third grade education. The defense, and the ADL, have always presented Jim Conley as a base character, guzzling alcohol and engaging in low brow behavior. They are the ones who exploited a harmful stereotype, not the prosecution.



Leo Frank was never exonerated, in 107 years since the crime occurred. Juries sometimes get it wrong, but Leo Frank's conviction stands- he's a murderer. Are you saying you have proof that Leo Frank was wrongfully convicted? Then by all means please present your version of events that will finally earn Frank a legal exoneration.

So, let me get this straight. You are defending the lynching.
 
Re: George Soros Funded Journalist: "The coronavirus crisis shows it's time to abolish the family"

Hitler did restore the glory of his nation's past, albeit briefly. Hitler said that the holocaust was payback for outside intervention in Germany's affairs, and said that jews would only be killed if international finance funded a war against Germany. Well, we know how that played out; investment bankers never met a war they didn't like. Hitler erred badly in assuming the bankers cared about lower and middle class jews.

Wow.

This is... something.


Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
 
Back
Top Bottom