• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Joe Biden's verbal gaffes might not be what you think

Miss Kitty said:
Is this the no opposing opinions allowed thread? Was the laughable allegation of Trump raping 20+ women relevant?
Click to expand...

If it is not relevant why are you posting on Trump raping 20 women the poster has yet to prove when called out on his/hers statement?
 
Tryagain said:
Show everyone here where Trump has been charged with the rape of 20 women. You must have links of all the legal paperwork issued by the different police department charging Trump with rape
Click to expand...

25 women accused him of sexual assault.


How many accused Obama? Zero.


Facts are facts
 
Tryagain said:
If it is not relevant why are you posting on Trump raping 20 women the poster has yet to prove when called out on his/her statement?
Click to expand...

The thread topic is about Joe Biden, not Donald Trump.

Based on the username, I assume Miss Kitty is a woman.
 
Tryagain said:
Not pretending anything. If Trump raped 20 women, prove it by supplying official documents from courts and police departments investigating the actions, otherwise it's just the ramblings of a person with DTS.
Click to expand...

Yes you are. Claiming there must be legal charges for accusations of sexual assault to exist is a blatant lie if you know what the words mean.

So again, do you know what sexual assault, legal charges, and accusations mean?
 
Last edited:
Blue Donkey said:
Bernie Sandeers and Elezabeth Warren had a lot of name recognition too, you know. So there is no reason to use that reason for Joe Bidcen blowing them out. Also, don't forget Biden was terrible in Iowa and New Hampshire, where Sanders tied with a former Indiana small town mayor. Democrats prefer Biden because he is a moderate who can appeal to independents, centrists, and liberals who oppose democratic socialism, unlike the far-left progressive candidates. That's what makes him electable.
Click to expand...

All I am saying is that he would not have been my first, second third or possibly even forth pick. If he road on Obama's coattails in 2016, he probably would have been the president today. four years of doing nothing seems to have increased the cognitive impairment in that brain of his.
 
charliebrown said:
All I am saying is that he would not have been my first, second third or possibly even fourth pick. If he rode on Obama's coattails in 2016, he probably would have been the president today. Four years of doing nothing seems to have increased the cognitive impairment in that brain of his.
Click to expand...

Joe Biden did a lot more than "nothing" after Donald Trump's inauguration. He was a private lawyer.
 
Blue Donkey said:
We all know the news media does not care enough about accuracy to include the full context and reasons for what happened in their reporting. One example is Joe Biden repeatedly being rumored to have an "obvious cognitive decline" based on nothing but gaffes in his speeches on the campaign trail. While this suspicion is totally understandable, it is only an assumption people who never knew him make, so the claims are unjustified. An article in Washington Monthly explains why.
The Disinformation Campaign Being Launched Against Biden | Washington Monthly
Click to expand...

I think I read somewhere of a thousand psychology professionals claiming someone with mental impairment is not fit for office of the president.
 
marke said:
I think I read somewhere of a thousand psychology professionals claiming someone with mental impairment is not fit for office of the president.
Click to expand...

350 said trump is a mental case
 
vegas giants said:
350 said trump is a mental case
Click to expand...

350 wimps banded together to try to make their unqualified piss-ant assessment seem to have more weight in their attempt to create the unscientific impression that Trump was unfit for office? Democrats can be so stupid at times.
 
marke said:
350 wimps banded together to try to make their unqualified piss-ant assessment seem to have more weight in their attempt to create the unscientific impression that Trump was unfit for office? Democrats can be so stupid at times.
Click to expand...

Thank you dr Phil. Lol
 
marke said:
I think I read somewhere of a thousand psychology professionals claiming someone with mental impairment is not fit for office of the president.
Click to expand...

They were specifically talking about Trump, who obviously has severe cognitive decline. The article i posted notes Biden is still not even close to that level of mental impairment.
 
marke said:
350 wimps banded together to try to make their unqualified piss-ant assessment seem to have more weight in their attempt to create the unscientific impression that Trump was unfit for office? Democrats can be so stupid at times.
Click to expand...

Why are you caling professional psychologists wimps?

FYI the education requirement to be a psychologist is minimum master's degree, preferably a Ph.D - so they are obviously very smart about what constitutes cognitive impairment in Trump's case.
 
Blue Donkey said:
They were specifically talking about Trump, who obviously has severe cognitive decline. The article i posted notes Biden is still not even close to that level of mental impairment.
Click to expand...

Democrats see Biden cannot think and talk coherently so they conclude Trump has mental problems. So typical.
 
Blue Donkey said:
Why are you caling professional psychologists wimps?

FYI the education requirement to be a psychologist is minimum master's degree, preferably a Ph.D - so they are obviously very smart about what constitutes cognitive impairment in Trump's case.
Click to expand...

Never trust a psychologist who does his analyses from a distance and requires mob agreement from scores of other professionals to give his illegitimate analysis the semblance of legitimacy.
 
Blue Donkey said:
Why are you caling professional psychologists wimps?

FYI the education requirement to be a psychologist is minimum master's degree, preferably a Ph.D - so they are obviously very smart about what constitutes cognitive impairment in Trump's case.
Click to expand...

Never trust a quack who relies on the likes of Rachel Maddow for material by which to analyze republicans from a distance and then looks for support from dozens of other similar quacks to back up his illegitimate wimpy conclusions.
 
marke said:
Never trust a psychologist who does his analyses from a distance and requires mob agreement from scores of other professionals to give his illegitimate analysis the semblance of legitimacy.
Click to expand...

Thank you dr phil
 
marke said:
Dr. Phil never analyzed the President from his lounge chair at home sitting in front of Rachel Maddow on TV.
Click to expand...

And your psychiatric opinion is worth less than dr Phil's. Lol
 
vegas giants said:
And your psychiatric opinion is worth less than dr Phil's. Lol
Click to expand...

I'll leave the evaluations to experts who know how to analyze the president by private session like all analysts do who know what they are doing.
 
marke said:
I'll leave the evaluations to experts who know how to analyze the president by private session like all analysts do who know what they are doing.
Click to expand...

Opinion noted and dismissed
 
marke said:
I'm not saying quacks don't have their job to do as well, especially since so many people favor the quacks over professionals.
Click to expand...

We call them Republicans
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom