- Joined
- Aug 30, 2019
- Messages
- 9,405
- Reaction score
- 5,877
- Location
- Oceania, 1984
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
This is a beautiful reaction to MSNBC’s atrocious coverage of Bernie Sanders. :lol:
This is a beautiful reaction to MSNBC’s atrocious coverage of Bernie Sanders. :lol:
I believe that, though the pummeling will very much be in the opposite direction.
It seems like nothing can stop him thus far, and the more people seem to disparage Sanders, the stronger he gets; though Teflon Don's ability to avoid lasting consequences from attacks may be impressive, it is nothing compared to a candidate who is like some kind of political Hulk in that he is not only impervious to attacks and smears, but just becomes more powerful for them.
If Bernie takes Iowa and NH, the powers that be better start preparing to either Epstein the man or rob him at a probable brokered DNC convention, as that's probably the only way he can be stopped; Bernie will eat Trump's lunch at the rust belt, which is where this election will be won or lost.
This is a beautiful reaction to MSNBC’s atrocious coverage of Bernie Sanders. :lol:
This is a beautiful reaction to MSNBC’s atrocious coverage of Bernie Sanders. :lol:
Seems there are a lot of people voting for spite, revenge, hatred, and humor.
Idiots like this is why we have idiots in office. Voting to spite the other side, in revenge for the other side, hatred for the other side and because it would be funny to see reactions from the other side should result in voting privileges being taken away. If you can't vote based on the actual issues then you shouldn't be voting.
While the fascist regime of trump turns this nation further into a Reich-Wing dictatorship, one day at a time, supporters of the far-left socialist sanders further divide the only way to beat trump, a unified Democratic Party.
Keep in mind that it’s been SOME of sanders’s supporters — SS — that start this **** each and every new day, just like they did in 2016. Also keep in mind that this SS is afraid or ‘unwilling’ to attack trump.
There’s no question that ‘some’ of these SS members are actually trump supporters.
She actually seems like a very informed voter, and was pondering several candidates. It was the MSNBC coverage that tipped the scales in Sanders’ favour.
What if the "other" sides bad outweighs the good on your side?Seems there are a lot of people voting for spite, revenge, hatred, and humor.
Idiots like this is why we have idiots in office. Voting to spite the other side, in revenge for the other side, hatred for the other side and because it would be funny to see reactions from the other side should result in voting privileges being taken away. If you can't vote based on the actual issues then you shouldn't be voting.
What if the "other" sides bad outweighs the good on your side?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
This is a beautiful reaction to MSNBC’s atrocious coverage of Bernie Sanders. :lol:
Would you cheer the same "logic" for a Trump voter? If someone said that they voted for Trump because of MSNBC's negative coverage of Trump I doubt you would say that was a "beautiful reaction".
I understand why some people vote red for Trump, but I think most of his supporters are dumb for believing his lies, for believing Trump will drain the swamp, for believing Trump will protect their SSN and Medicare, and for believing Trump cares about America and isn’t trying to obtain power for the benefit of himself.
For years, I have criticized MSM and Fox. Fox simply enables everything a republican does, and they fail at holding Republicans accountable until it’s too late. The MSM and donor class are one in the same. The MSM doesn’t cover, research, nor educate the public or themselves on kitchen table issues and provide a constructive forum for policy development and discussion. Both sides of the media are compete failures in their own way, and both largely ignore average citizens. The entire media enables horrible leaders, the donor class system, and the status quo.
Isnt it reasonable to vote against someone that you believe will do grave harm to the nation by voting for someone else that you might not necessarily support but think the country will be left in better condition than the alternative choice?I don't know what you are talking about.
Isnt it reasonable to vote against someone that you believe will do grave harm to the nation by voting for someone else that you might not necessarily support but think the country will be left in better condition than the alternative choice?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The MSM offers entertainment (which they pretend is "infotainment"), mainly in the form of confirmation bias, in exchange for advertising revenue. The NYT says it best with their motto "All the news that's fit to print" - who, exactly, is deciding what is fit to print (present), much less why, is never disclosed.
Most media bias is accomplished by simple omission - since not investigating/reporting something has zero cost and is very effective since it wastes no bandwidth which is then used to serve up confirmation bias and "news analysis".
Huh. She's so stupid she could be a twumper.
I think the MSM and Fox are both trying to maintain power in society. Their donors, lobbyists, and advertisers is who they really care about. Fox News viewers are not informed either. I also believe if a Democrat were in office, abusing power like Trump, I believe the MSM would be more likely to turn on that Democrat and so would the party’s base. Fox News is difference, because they cheerlead Republicans no matter what.
It’s a sign of how divisive society is now.
We have elites fighting against themselves, and regular people fighting against each other. There is way too much corruption in the power and elite class, and both media’s ignore it
You claimed that voting out of hatred for the other side is idiotic. Im saying thats not always true.What does that have to do with my post? Nevermind it. Great point. You nailed it. :roll: