• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

MSNBC’s Joy Reid invites body language expert on to prove Bernie is a lying sack

Phys251 said:
CT forum's that-a-way. :lol:
Click to expand...

Its not a theory. Its spelled out in black and white in emails between Hillary's campaign and DNC leadership. Also, not one shred of those emails was disputed, once, ever, by team Hillary.
 
KevinKohler said:
Its not a theory. Its spelled out in black and white in emails between Hillary's campaign and DNC leadership. Also, not one shred of those emails was disputed, once, ever, by team Hillary.
Click to expand...

Please prove with supporting documentation exactly how many primary votes the DNC changed via their alleged collusion. :)
 
Phys251 said:
Please prove with supporting documentation exactly how many primary votes the DNC changed via their alleged collusion. :)
Click to expand...

Actually, the burden is on you to disprove the available evidence, not KevinKohler to dispute your strawman. The DNC even handed Hillary debate questions prior to her debates with Bernie. The impact of collusion can be debated, the fact of collusion cannot be. If collusion doesn’t matter, then Dems have been chasing their own ass with regard to Russia.
 
Dans La Lune said:
Actually, the burden is on you to disprove the available evidence, not KevinKohler to dispute your strawman. The DNC even handed Hillary debate questions prior to her debates with Bernie. The impact of collusion can be debated, the fact of collusion cannot be. If collusion doesn’t matter, then Dems have been chasing their own ass with regard to Russia.
Click to expand...

I wasn't asking you, but since you chose to insert yourself here, it is very telling that you are unable to provide any evidence of how many votes the DNC changed, don't you think? If they really did it, this should be a simple task for you. :)
 
Phys251 said:
I wasn't asking you, but since you chose to insert yourself here, it is very telling that you are unable to provide any evidence of how many votes the DNC changed, don't you think? If they really did it, this should be a simple task for you. :)
Click to expand...

So what you’re saying is that Russia collusion is a hoax.
 
Dans La Lune said:
So what you’re saying is that Russia collusion is a hoax.
Click to expand...

I've said before that Trump supporters and Sanders supporters use remarkably similar tactics. It's always fascinating when I see examples of those kinds of tactics. :lol:
 
Phys251 said:
I've said before that Trump supporters and Sanders supporters use remarkably similar tactics. It's always fascinating when I see examples of those kinds of tactics. :lol:
Click to expand...

I’m using your own logic.
 
Phys251 said:
Please prove with supporting documentation exactly how many primary votes the DNC changed via their alleged collusion. :)
Click to expand...

Do the same for Russian collusion. Do the same for the quid pro quo.
 
This thread is hilarious. Judging by the vitriol, sexism, and smears against other posters is it fair to assume that Phys251 is a Bernie Bro? Am I doing this right?
 
KevinKohler said:
Do the same for Russian collusion. Do the same for the quid pro quo.
Click to expand...

I asked you first. :thumbs: And I seriously hope that you're not attempting to put alleged influence of one's own primary with one of the greatest infiltrations in human history. :lol:
 
Phys251 said:
I asked you first. :thumbs: And I seriously hope that you're not attempting to put alleged influence of one's own primary with one of the greatest infiltrations in human history. :lol:
Click to expand...

Pro've Russia's influence as a result of this infiltration?

Prove Trumps influence of the election by trying to use a foreign power to damage a political opponent?

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, yes? Or...are you a hypocrite?
 
KevinKohler said:
Pro've Russia's influence as a result of this infiltration?

Prove Trumps influence of the election by trying to use a foreign power to damage a political opponent?

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, yes? Or...are you a hypocrite?
Click to expand...

And here come the dodges and ad-hom insinuations.

I'll give you one more chance to first prove that the DNC changed people's votes through their influence, an allegation which, even if it were true, is far, far less serious than the Russian hacking scandal. Your failure to do so will be taken as your inability to do it. Now, go. :)
 
Phys251 said:
And here come the dodges and ad-hom insinuations.

I'll give you one more chance to first prove that the DNC changed people's votes through their influence, an allegation which, even if it were true, is far, far less serious than the Russian hacking scandal. Your failure to do so will be taken as your inability to do it. Now, go. :)
Click to expand...

Can't be proven. What CAN be proven is that the DNC obviously doesn't support democracy, opting instead to put their thumb on the scales.

Now...prove that the Russians swayed voters towards Trump.

Prove that the alleged quid pro quo between Trump and Ukraine influenced, or would have influenced, political support for one of Trumps political rivals.

Is that not the standard you've set for me?

Or are you just another poster less interested in debate and self improvement, and more interested in "not being wrong"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom