• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYT Finally Embraces IQ Differences between Races/Ethnicities

I could ask the same question of you, or of Bret Stephens. I don't believe in a 'master race' theory, which I've told you dozens of times. You're deliberately misrepresenting facts, OK no surprise there, that's what you do for a living. We've found the fragile flower that Bret Stephens mentioned in his Times article.

If there is a master race it is the race of Ashkenazi Jews. I would not say that if I was Jewish. One of the many things I admire about the Jews is their humility about their obvious superiority.
 
I mean we can always do what charles murray and his ilk do and just ignore any data that would show contrary to the pre-conceived idea that his funders wanted to see and use alt-reich journals as sources....

Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein make three assertions in The Bell Curve: intelligence is the single most important factor in determining academic and economic success and other favorable outcomes in life; intelligence is mainly determined genetically; people of some races tend to have more intelligence than people of other races.

There is no data that discredits these assertions. They are obvious to anyone who has taught in a multi racial public school.
 
If there is a master race it is the race of Ashkenazi Jews. I would not say that if I was Jewish. One of the many things I admire about the Jews is their humility about their obvious superiority.

Israel ranks 41st in IQ, and 39th in education. There are some very intelligent Jewish people, but the idea of them being intellectually superior is complete nonsense. I also fail to see humility as a common trait of Jews, since they either consider themselves to be the chosen people of God (and therefore non-Jews are inferior), or they believe their experience on earth is completely unique, and they are entitled to privileges that others aren't.

In reality, Jews score high in mental disorders like neurosis, schizophrenia, and delusions of grandeur.
 
Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein make three assertions in The Bell Curve: intelligence is the single most important factor in determining academic and economic success and other favorable outcomes in life; intelligence is mainly determined genetically; people of some races tend to have more intelligence than people of other races.

There is no data that discredits these assertions. They are obvious to anyone who has taught in a multi racial public school.

Why does the predominantly Jewish faculty at Harvard have to discriminate against Asian students? Because Asians are smater than Ashkenazi Jews, and would become the majority of Harvard's student body, if the admissions process solely used academic merit as criteria for admittance.
 
IQ tests were designed for whites of European ancestry. Nevertheless, it was soon discovered that Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese tend to perform better on the tests tham whites of European ancestry - unless those whites are Ashkenazi Jews.

That is false. We know that there are more Ashkenazi Jews concentrated in Israel than in any other country. Israel ranks 41st in IQ, while the great melting pot of the USA ranks in the top 20.
 
Israel ranks 41st in IQ, and 39th in education. There are some very intelligent Jewish people, but the idea of them being intellectually superior is complete nonsense. I also fail to see humility as a common trait of Jews, since they either consider themselves to be the chosen people of God (and therefore non-Jews are inferior), or they believe their experience on earth is completely unique, and they are entitled to privileges that others aren't.

In reality, Jews score high in mental disorders like neurosis, schizophrenia, and delusions of grandeur.

A minority of the Israeli population are Ashkenazi Jews. Nevertheless, Ashkenazi Jews make up nearly 80% of the Jewish population worldwide. It is the Ashkenazim who pack the IQ power.
 
That is false. We know that there are more Ashkenazi Jews concentrated in Israel than in any other country. Israel ranks 41st in IQ, while the great melting pot of the USA ranks in the top 20.

RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE REVISED EDITION OF S. J. GOULD'S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN, by Professor J. Philippe Rughton

Department of Psychology
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario N6A 5C2

Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3,022 of whom were African American) which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino, White, Asian, and Jewish Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.

Article...
 
Why does the predominantly Jewish faculty at Harvard have to discriminate against Asian students? Because Asians are smater than Ashkenazi Jews, and would become the majority of Harvard's student body, if the admissions process solely used academic merit as criteria for admittance.

The faculty at Harvard is not predominantly Jewish. Orientals are discriminated against in university admissions because Negroes and Hispanics are discriminated in favor of.
 
That is false. We know that there are more Ashkenazi Jews concentrated in Israel than in any other country. Israel ranks 41st in IQ, while the great melting pot of the USA ranks in the top 20.

Byron M. Roth, American Renaissance, November 2011

Richard Lynn, The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement, Washington Summit Publishers, 2011, 408 pp.

The Chosen People: A study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement is the most recent work of Richard Lynn dealing with group differences in IQ and their ramifications. As in all of his previous work over the past decade, he substantiates his arguments with huge quantities of empirical data. He advances his positions dispassionately and lets the facts speak for themselves, which they do in impressive, nearly irrefutable fashion. In his previous books he examined racial and ethnic differences in IQ for many groups. The Chosen People is a case study of one distinct group that has shown remarkably similar patterns of achievement in a wide variety of settings.

Professor Lynn begins by pointing out the extraordinary success of Jews in almost every field. In the 19th century the restrictions that had prevented most Jews from advanced nonreligious study began to be lifted in most of Western Europe, and by mid-century, “people began to observe that Jews were outstandingly successful, and began to speculate that this was attributable to their intellect.” (Unless otherwise noted, all quotations are from Professor Lynn.)

At that time the great bulk of Jews were still living in Eastern Europe, but owing to pogroms beginning around 1880, Jews began migrating to Western Europe and especially to the United States. They formed part of the massive immigration to the US in the period from 1880 to 1924.

Prof. Lynn writes:

"They arrived as penniless refugees unable to speak the languages of their new countries; they were the “huddled masses” from the most backward region of Europe. Yet by the middle decades of the 20th century, the children and grandchildren of these immigrants were doing far better than their Gentile hosts on all indices of socioeconomic status and earnings and outperforming them by several orders of magnitude in obtaining elite academic distinction."

The development of IQ tests confirmed the impression that Jews were unusually intelligent, and Professor Lynn’s extensive review of the literature indicates that Jews in the US have an average IQ of 110 compared to 100 for other Europeans. This would help account for their outstanding performance in a variety of fields. Though Jews are only about 0.2 percent of the world population, half the world’s chess grandmasters, for example, and 16 percent of Nobel Prize winners for science have been Jews. For Professor Lynn, the purpose of his book “is to document and explain such achievements.” It would be a mistake to think that these are the accomplishments of all Jews, however, as they are mainly the achievements of Ashkenazi Jews, the Jews of Eastern Europe...

The most notable difference among Jewish groups is average IQ. While the Ashkenazi average is 110, the Sephardic average is about 99, close to that of Europeans. The Mizrahim score about 91, markedly lower than Europeans, but higher than the Arabs with whom they have lived, whose average is about 84. The genetically distinct Falashas have IQs of about 70, typical of sub-Saharan people.

The Chosen People - American Renaissance
 
The thread has become nazi spam. Looks like what I'd expect a Stormfront thread looks like. It has "IQ Scientists" and everything. Full blown racist scumbaggery.
 
The thread has become nazi spam. Looks like what I'd expect a Stormfront thread looks like. It has "IQ Scientists" and everything. Full blown racist scumbaggery.

It is ironic that the Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence led to the belief that there are no inferior races. This paradox has been called "Hitler's revenge."
 
The thread has become nazi spam. Looks like what I'd expect a Stormfront thread looks like. It has "IQ Scientists" and everything. Full blown racist scumbaggery.

If it makes you feel any better Stromfront banned me after two weeks for praising the Jews.
 
That is false. We know that there are more Ashkenazi Jews concentrated in Israel than in any other country. Israel ranks 41st in IQ, while the great melting pot of the USA ranks in the top 20.
The usual dishonest tripe one may expect from you.

There are nearly as many Ashkenazim in the US as Israel holds Jews in total. With "only" 50 pct of the latter being of Ashkenazim roots.

As to which source you use for your "convenient" ranking, I don't even want to know. The "questionability" of IQ tests quite aside, especially when they're supplied by the likes of Jew-hating White Supremacists.
 
The thread has become nazi spam. Looks like what I'd expect a Stormfront thread looks like. It has "IQ Scientists" and everything. Full blown racist scumbaggery.
..................accompanied by the usual lies that the OP is long since known for.
 
A minority of the Israeli population are Ashkenazi Jews. Nevertheless, Ashkenazi Jews make up nearly 80% of the Jewish population worldwide. It is the Ashkenazim who pack the IQ power.

The main difference between Ashkenazi Jews and other Jews is the European heritage of Ashkenazim. The majority trace their lineage to Eastern Europe, where Jewish men married European women who'd converted to Judaism.
 
Byron M. Roth, American Renaissance, November 2011

Richard Lynn, The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement, Washington Summit Publishers, 2011, 408 pp.

The Chosen People: A study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement is the most recent work of Richard Lynn dealing with group differences in IQ and their ramifications. As in all of his previous work over the past decade, he substantiates his arguments with huge quantities of empirical data. He advances his positions dispassionately and lets the facts speak for themselves, which they do in impressive, nearly irrefutable fashion. In his previous books he examined racial and ethnic differences in IQ for many groups. The Chosen People is a case study of one distinct group that has shown remarkably similar patterns of achievement in a wide variety of settings.

Professor Lynn begins by pointing out the extraordinary success of Jews in almost every field. In the 19th century the restrictions that had prevented most Jews from advanced nonreligious study began to be lifted in most of Western Europe, and by mid-century, “people began to observe that Jews were outstandingly successful, and began to speculate that this was attributable to their intellect.” (Unless otherwise noted, all quotations are from Professor Lynn.)

At that time the great bulk of Jews were still living in Eastern Europe, but owing to pogroms beginning around 1880, Jews began migrating to Western Europe and especially to the United States. They formed part of the massive immigration to the US in the period from 1880 to 1924.

Prof. Lynn writes:

"They arrived as penniless refugees unable to speak the languages of their new countries; they were the “huddled masses” from the most backward region of Europe. Yet by the middle decades of the 20th century, the children and grandchildren of these immigrants were doing far better than their Gentile hosts on all indices of socioeconomic status and earnings and outperforming them by several orders of magnitude in obtaining elite academic distinction."

The development of IQ tests confirmed the impression that Jews were unusually intelligent, and Professor Lynn’s extensive review of the literature indicates that Jews in the US have an average IQ of 110 compared to 100 for other Europeans. This would help account for their outstanding performance in a variety of fields. Though Jews are only about 0.2 percent of the world population, half the world’s chess grandmasters, for example, and 16 percent of Nobel Prize winners for science have been Jews. For Professor Lynn, the purpose of his book “is to document and explain such achievements.” It would be a mistake to think that these are the accomplishments of all Jews, however, as they are mainly the achievements of Ashkenazi Jews, the Jews of Eastern Europe...

The most notable difference among Jewish groups is average IQ. While the Ashkenazi average is 110, the Sephardic average is about 99, close to that of Europeans. The Mizrahim score about 91, markedly lower than Europeans, but higher than the Arabs with whom they have lived, whose average is about 84. The genetically distinct Falashas have IQs of about 70, typical of sub-Saharan people.

The Chosen People - American Renaissance

This is a sensitive subject, because although many Jews in the US would love to claim intellectual superiority over whites, they've also bashed IQ tests for decades, due to the fact that whites outperform blacks. This is purely due to the fact that Jews have always viewed white gentiles as their primary competition, and harbor resentment towards them. The coming decades will be interesting, because east Asians have average IQs that equal or surpass Ashkenazi Jews. Asians will be in competition for many academic and professional roles, as white non-Jews fade into nonexistence. Ashkenazi Jews will have to find ways of discriminating against Asians, in order to retain control of institutions like Harvard, in the same manner they once accused whites of discriminating against Jews.
 
The faculty at Harvard is not predominantly Jewish. Orientals are discriminated against in university admissions because Negroes and Hispanics are discriminated in favor of.

Harvard disproportionately favors black and Latino students because it allows them to appear as if they're following the diversity gospel. The only category of race or ethnicity which is underrepresented at Harvard is white non-Jews (60% of the country vs 25% of Harvard).
Jews on the other hand, are 2% of the population of the US, and a whopping 25% of Harvard's student body. They are overrepresented by 12.5x.

The single trait that Jews dominate in is deception. The lawsuit brought against Harvard by Asian students was successfully framed as an attempt by white people to end affirmative action at the school. Harvard actually found a way to blame white people, when the plaintiffs were Asians, and the single most overrepresented group at Harvard are Jews. The media bought it (or played cover up for Harvard) and the courts have backed Harvard so far. They are free to discriminate against Asians, while blaming whites, and benefitting Jews. Deception is their greatest ability, not academic brilliance.
 
This is a sensitive subject, because although many Jews in the US would love to claim intellectual superiority over whites, they've also bashed IQ tests for decades, due to the fact that whites outperform blacks. This is purely due to the fact that Jews have always viewed white gentiles as their primary competition, and harbor resentment towards them. The coming decades will be interesting, because east Asians have average IQs that equal or surpass Ashkenazi Jews. Asians will be in competition for many academic and professional roles, as white non-Jews fade into nonexistence. Ashkenazi Jews will have to find ways of discriminating against Asians, in order to retain control of institutions like Harvard, in the same manner they once accused whites of discriminating against Jews.

Jews tend to shy away from racial IQ comparisons because they know that antisemitism is motivated by Gentile resentment of Jewish intelligence and prosperity. In addition, I think many Jews are compassionate for those who lack their ability to succeed.
 
Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein make three assertions in The Bell Curve: intelligence is the single most important factor in determining academic and economic success and other favorable outcomes in life; intelligence is mainly determined genetically; people of some races tend to have more intelligence than people of other races.

There is no data that discredits these assertions. They are obvious to anyone who has taught in a multi racial public school.

This is something you have yet to prove. His sources are junk data that ignores inconvenient factors just because and he just assumes his percentages based on unproven assertions of consensus and alt-right journals along with eugenics propaganda mills like the pioneer fund.

Race is a social construct because the classification changes based on the dominant people of the time. This isnt really disputed. Yes in fact there is plenty of data that contradicts it. The bell curve is pure pioneer fund propaganda.
 
Last edited:
The main difference between Ashkenazi Jews and other Jews is the European heritage of Ashkenazim. The majority trace their lineage to Eastern Europe, where Jewish men married European women who'd converted to Judaism.
Pure idiocy showing how ignorance can breed the very same.

Sephardim have their origin in Europe (Spain) as much as Ashkenazim (Germany) do.

The latter not having migrated to Eastern Europe until the times of the crusades (due to pogroms) and many moving back West from the 18th century onwards (again due to pogroms).

That both groups inter-married with converted goyim is as little disputed as it is totally beside the point here.
 
This is something you have yet to prove. His sources are junk data that ignores inconvenient factors just because and he just assumes his percentages based on unproven assertions of consensus and alt-right journals along with eugenics propaganda mills like the pioneer fund.

Race is a social construct because the classification changes based on the dominant people of the time. This isnt really disputed. Yes in fact there is plenty of data that contradicts it. The bell curve is pure pioneer fund propaganda.

If there is any value in that two hours and 39 minutes long video, convey it in your own words. If you cannot do that you do not understand it. You simply like what it says.

The dogma "Race is only a social construct" would only make sense if the races are equivalent in ability levels and behavior. They clearly are not. They differ in ways that are durable, and obvious to anyone who has known many people of different races. A person's race can usually be determined by appearance and always by DNA analysis.

The basic assertions of The Bell Curve are obvious to anyone who has taught at a multi racial public school. Those assertions have been proved publicly and graphically by the failure of Head Start and No Child Left Behind to close the race gap in academic performance. Nothing can close the race gap in average intelligence because it is hard coded genetically. We have wasted enough money of futile efforts like this.

The different races differ significantly in average ability and behavior because they have evolved for thousands of years in response to different population pressures. During most of history in civilizations intelligent men tended to be more prosperous than unintelligent men. They usually had more children who survived to adulthood. Criminals were killed at the scene of the crime, they died in custody, or they were executed. Evolving in a cold climate also promotes intelligence. Those who live where there are frigid winters must be able to build houses that keep out the cold. They must be able to build winter clothing. They must store food for the winter months.

This is why races that practiced civilization the longest have higher IQ averages and lower crime rates than races that have been more recently introduced. I am defining a civilization as "a city based culture where the government has an effective monopoly on the legitimate use of violence."

"Race is only a social construct" is an example of a circular fallacy. In a circular fallacy one asserts what one needs to prove.
 
Last edited:
If there is any value in that two hours and 39 minutes long video, convey it in your own words. If you cannot do that you do not understand it. You simply like what it says.

The dogma "Race is only a social construct" would only make sense if the races are equivalent in ability levels and behavior. They clearly are not. They differ in ways that are durable, and obvious to anyone who has known many people of different races. A person's race can usually be determined by appearance and always by DNA analysis.

The basic assertions of The Bell Curve are obvious to anyone who has taught at a multi racial public school. Those assertions have been proved publicly and graphically by the failure of Head Start and No Child Left Behind to close the race gap in academic performance. Nothing can close the race gap in average intelligence because it is hard coded genetically. We have wasted enough money of futile efforts like this.

The different races differ significantly in average ability and behavior because they have evolved for thousands of years in response to different population pressures. During most of history in civilizations intelligent men tended to be more prosperous than unintelligent men. They usually had more children who survived to adulthood. Criminals were killed at the scene of the crime, they died in custody, or they were executed. Evolving in a cold climate also promotes intelligence. Those who live where there are frigid winters must be able to build houses that keep out the cold. They must be able to build winter clothing. They must store food for the winter months.

This is why races that practiced civilization the longest have higher IQ averages and lower crime rates than races that have been more recently introduced. I am defining a civilization as "a city based culture where the government has an effective monopoly on the legitimate use of violence."

"Race is only a social construct" is an example of a circular fallacy. In a circular fallacy one asserts what one needs to prove.

Actually that isnt the basis for calling race a social construct. Nobody says that dark skin doesnt exist or that every single person is the same. The basis of race has always been socially constructed in the attributes that people group together has little biological basis. The concept of white race and the white stock has changed based on the dominant group at the time which is why the irish were considered a subspecies that linked was an inbetween race between the caucazoid and the african race. Race realists will ignore the racism that irish people suffered by saying “oh its just culture” but the reality is that the English thought of the irish as a diminuative race. Finally social constructs exist ;). Laws are social constructs yet nobody denies they exist.

Now that we got that strawman out of the way the bolded is just a bald ass assertion. Sorry bub eugenics is pseudoscience get over it. At least i can link to resources that better explain things while you have shown bupkiss. Cry me a river about dogma you who continue to support early 20th century eugenics quackery.

I got actual beneficial work to do so i thought showing a little rundown would have sufficed for now but it seems you are more hellbent on depriving certain people of opportunities.

The first clue to the questionability of Murray’s work despite your shrill declarations that “nobody questions his work” was that his work is sourced and funded by the pioneer fund, an American nazi eugenics think tank.
 
Last edited:
Sorry bub eugenics is pseudoscience get over it. At least i can link to resources that better explain things while you have shown bupkiss. Cry me a river about dogma you who continue to support early 20th century eugenics quackery.

What is "pseudo" about eugenics? Nationally and internationally those with IQ's below 100 are having more children who survive and reproduce than people with IQ's above 100. At the same computer technology and automation are reducing the better paying jobs most people have the intelligence to learn. If current trends continue, a growing percentage of the world's population will be incapable of doing anything useful for a living.
 
What is "pseudo" about eugenics? Nationally and internationally those with IQ's below 100 are having more children who survive and reproduce than people with IQ's above 100. At the same computer technology and automation are reducing the better paying jobs most people have the intelligence to learn. If current trends continue, a growing percentage of the world's population will be incapable of doing anything useful for a living.

Ever wonder why we dont use it anymore? Oh its just a hippie conspiracy i tells ya! Eugenics uses the same faulty assumptions as the royals back in the day when they were inbreeding to create a pure race who has perfect genes because all gene expression is expressed only through inheritance and environmental factors dont play a role. Eugenics also fails to grasp how organisms gain beneficial traits. It was also supplemented by phrenology and race “science” which was always a biased pseudoscience created to justify racial supremacy. We didnt get rid of it just because it was insanely barbaric and immoral, its junk science biased by the assumption of white supremacy. There is only one logical conclusion of the eugenics programme, genocide and history has shown it as clear as day.

Ignoring the environmental impacts as Murray explicitly does in his book as he just hand waves anything that might be important and only including 4 factors is lazy.

He also cites journals that are not actually scientific journals like mankind quarterly is the icing on the dip****.

Have you actually tried to look for sources that disagree or did you simply assume?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom