• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tacky Journalism: 'The Jews of the Impeachment'

They're using antisemitism as a weapon against Europe and the USA to get unfair laws passed, and then retreating behind baseless accusations of antisemitism when they're called out.

So, you're admitting that you're an anti-Semite. That is good to know. Thanks for your honesty about your prejudice against Jews.
 
So, you're admitting that you're an anti-Semite. That is good to know. Thanks for your honesty about your prejudice against Jews.

May I say, antisemitism is used as a weapon against Europe and the USA to get unfair laws passed, and then many of the culprits behind such laws hide behind baseless accusations of antisemitism when they're called out.
 
May I say, antisemitism is used as a weapon against Europe and the USA to get unfair laws passed, and then many of the culprits behind such laws hide behind baseless accusations of antisemitism when they're called out.
Accusing YOU of being a Jew hater is as far away from "baseless" as can be imagined.

Accusing YOU of being a bigot is as far away from "baseless" as can be imagined.

Accusing YOU of being a racist is as far away from "baseless" as can be imagined.

Accusing YOU of being a fascist worshiper is as far away from "baseless" as can be imagined.

Seeing how you constantly provide ample proof of being all of the above.

Including the pathetic whining over spades being called spades.
 
Ari Feldman has created some truly tasteless online content at the Forward in his employment there, such as an article on Jordan Peterson which compared him to Adolph Hitler, but this may take the cake-

EKZAFPTWkAIOi2S


The Trump Impeachment Inquiry’s Jewish Characters – The Forward

What's point is there in mentioning that nearly all the top players working to impeach Trump are Jewish, while most of Trump's inner circle are also Jewish? Is the author trying to posit a canard about jews controlling Washington DC, and perhaps Adam Schiff's impeachment inquiry being controlled opposition?

I was listening to a Conservative talk show. The host is Jewish and he was pointing out how the American Jews are divided along the lines of traditional morality versus relative morality. Schiff, for example, constantly breaks the commandment of bearing false witness. Epstein was an immoral child molester. They make use of relative morality for self gain. The talk show host called them Jews in name only, since they are not with the program, other than to take advantage using the title.

That type of Jew, in name only, is about self promotion for money and/or power, with no shame or morals. They represent behavior where anti-Semitism becomes almost valid, since they oppose human decency.

The talk show host was concerned that these bad, Jew in names only apples, who deserve censor, could cause anti-Semitism, to spread to the good Jewish apples. In other words, the old negative Jewish stereo types that inspired hate, now have tangible expressions in culture. They might cause a wide scale backlash, if they are not policed and addressed by the good Jews.

The host went on to do a parallel between Trump and Jesus. He was not saying Trump was as pure as Jesus but they both had something in common. Both were being railroaded by immoral Jews and their deep states. Jesus was innocent, but the Pharisees were determined to put him to death by any means possible. They even turned the mob against an innocent man. The mob preferred the criminal.
 
Last edited:
I was listening to a Conservative talk show. The host is Jewish and he was pointing out how the American Jews are divided along the lines of traditional morality versus relative morality. Schiff, for example, constantly breaks the commandment of bearing false witness. Epstein was an immoral child molester. They make use of relative morality for self gain. The talk show host called them Jews in name only, since they are not with the program, other than to take advantage using the title.

That type of Jew, in name only, is about self promotion for money and/or power, with no shame or morals. They represent behavior where anti-Semitism becomes almost valid, since they oppose human decency.

The talk show host was concerned that these bad, Jew in names only apples, who deserve censor, could cause anti-Semitism, to spread to the good Jewish apples. In other words, the old negative Jewish stereo types that inspired hate, now have tangible expressions in culture. They might cause a wide scale backlash, if they are not policed and addressed by the good Jews.

The host went on to do a parallel between Trump and Jesus. He was not saying Trump was as pure as Jesus but they both had something in common. Both were being railroaded by immoral Jews and their deep states. Jesus was innocent, but the Pharisees were determined to put him to death by any means possible. They even turned the mob against an innocent man. The mob preferred the criminal.
There is no validity whatsoever for anti-semitism, seeing how "Judenhass" (the far more honest original term for negatively broadbrushing a whole group) generates hatred on the principle of generalization.

If one wants to condemn a piece of scum like Epstein, that's perfectly valid, if one explains his despicable behavior by his being (having been) Jewish, one makes oneself look as much the fool as if one claims that Sicilians are by default mafiosi.

As to the idea that the good guys of any group need to speak out against the bad ones, simply for the sake of not being confused with those, good luck. Because on that principle ALL Americans would have no time left for anything else, nor would French, Brits, Germans or Romulans.

And, just to update you on history (not to mention biblical issues), Jesus was, if the whole narrative of his existence is to be at all believed, executed by the Romans. Being addressed here only because you brought it up but also destined for any further discussion to the religious forum(s), since that whole issue totally derails this thread.
 
Last edited:
Ari Feldman has created some truly tasteless online content at the Forward in his employment there, such as an article on Jordan Peterson which compared him to Adolph Hitler, but this may take the cake-

EKZAFPTWkAIOi2S


The Trump Impeachment Inquiry’s Jewish Characters – The Forward

What's point is there in mentioning that nearly all the top players working to impeach Trump are Jewish, while most of Trump's inner circle are also Jewish? Is the author trying to posit a canard about jews controlling Washington DC, and perhaps Adam Schiff's impeachment inquiry being controlled opposition?

I've never understood why people are still associated with the Nazis. The Nazi got annihilated in WW2 and clearly were a bunch of sociopaths.
 
I've never understood why people are still associated with the Nazis. The Nazi got annihilated in WW2 and clearly were a bunch of sociopaths.

Same could be said about the Confederacy. But yet, look at all the morons who proudly wave their defeated flag.
 
I was listening to a Conservative talk show. The host is Jewish and he was pointing out how the American Jews are divided along the lines of traditional morality versus relative morality. Schiff, for example, constantly breaks the commandment of bearing false witness. Epstein was an immoral child molester. They make use of relative morality for self gain. The talk show host called them Jews in name only, since they are not with the program, other than to take advantage using the title.

That type of Jew, in name only, is about self promotion for money and/or power, with no shame or morals. They represent behavior where anti-Semitism becomes almost valid, since they oppose human decency.

The talk show host was concerned that these bad, Jew in names only apples, who deserve censor, could cause anti-Semitism, to spread to the good Jewish apples. In other words, the old negative Jewish stereo types that inspired hate, now have tangible expressions in culture. They might cause a wide scale backlash, if they are not policed and addressed by the good Jews.

The host went on to do a parallel between Trump and Jesus. He was not saying Trump was as pure as Jesus but they both had something in common. Both were being railroaded by immoral Jews and their deep states. Jesus was innocent, but the Pharisees were determined to put him to death by any means possible. They even turned the mob against an innocent man. The mob preferred the criminal.

I believe you're referring to Michael Savage. The problem isn't solely with Democrats, as most of the GOP's top funders are neoconservative Zionists. The neocons don't care about the wellbeing of American society, and usually support lax borders, outsourcing of American jobs, unlimited business mergers resulting in monopolies, illegal immigration, etc. They only care about two things- making money, and protecting Israel. They view the USA as a corporation, not a country. Our military are just employees of the corporation, who are sent out to violently protect the corporation's interests around the globe.
 
I've never understood why people are still associated with the Nazis. The Nazi got annihilated in WW2 and clearly were a bunch of sociopaths.

Nazis don't exist anymore. National socialism as an ideology may be gaining popularity, as globalism and runaway capitalism have left many victims in its wake. Malignant capitalism is what's driving the shift towards the far right and far left.
 
May I say, antisemitism is used as a weapon against Europe and the USA to get unfair laws passed, and then many of the culprits behind such laws hide behind baseless accusations of antisemitism when they're called out.

I wish you wouldn't.

Sincerely, Parrish
 
May I say, antisemitism is used as a weapon against Europe and the USA to get unfair laws passed, and then many of the culprits behind such laws hide behind baseless accusations of antisemitism when they're called out.

Amazing how 2% of the population can scare so many people. "I know, let's fire up the ovens!"

Or, is that Tiki torches these days?
 
Amazing how 2% of the population can scare so many people. "I know, let's fire up the ovens!"

Or, is that Tiki torches these days?

Jew-Hatred-600x299.jpg


'What? Jordan Peterson believes boys & girls are different, and wants to keep young white men from killing themselves? He's killing jooz!'

When Jews use their influence to poison the well (pardon the expression) under the ruse of fighting fascism, they absolutely are acting according to what the stereotypes said they were.
 
The Anti-Defamation League has said that Eastern Europe is a hotbed for antisemitism. So how did an Eastern European country like Ukraine elect a Jewish president, when 99.7% of people in the Ukraine aren't Jewish? Perhaps the Anti-Defamation League are a bunch of lying Shylocks, like the poster who will respond to me next?

Because he was a popular tv personality so they decided to take a flyer on him. Ukrainians can be as stupid as americans it seems.

People have told me that anybody that uses terms like lying shylock as a pejorative is a jew hating far right wing clown. I don't know myself but some people say.
 
Wow!

Thanks for posting this info.

Of course, I do not dare comment on its substance.

I noticed that in another thread, a minister was accused of making the same accusation as the Forward does.

The minister's accusation, however, was phrased in very crude and vulgar terms.

The Forward 's article, on the other hand, is handled in a more rational manner.

For the sake of the country, I hope that people will NOT discuss people's religion when discussing the coup against the President.

Its odd, accountability is now refered to as a coup. A coup is violent overthrow, hyperbole much ?
 
Because he was a popular tv personality so they decided to take a flyer on him. Ukrainians can be as stupid as americans it seems.

But the ADL declared Ukraine to be brimming with antisemitism, and it's a lie. The ADL make their living by lying to the American public, which may in turn increase antisemitism, as people who don't have anything against Jews are turned off by the incessant lies and attempts to whip up hysteria.

People have told me that anybody that uses terms like lying shylock as a pejorative is a jew hating far right wing clown. I don't know myself but some people say.

Shylock is a character from a play by Shakespeare, and dates from around 400 years ago. If Shakespeare offends you, you may want to seek a safe space, and assume the fetal position.
 
Wow!

Thanks for posting this info.

Of course, I do not dare comment on its substance.

I noticed that in another thread, a minister was accused of making the same accusation as the Forward does.

The minister's accusation, however, was phrased in very crude and vulgar terms.

The Forward 's article, on the other hand, is handled in a more rational manner.

For the sake of the country, I hope that people will NOT discuss people's religion when discussing the coup against the President.

Coo! Coo! Coo!
I recommend Merriam-Websters to Americans.
 
But the ADL declared Ukraine to be brimming with antisemitism, and it's a lie. The ADL make their living by lying to the American public, which may in turn increase antisemitism, as people who don't have anything against Jews are turned off by the incessant lies and attempts to whip up hysteria.

Not "brimming" but certainly with a long history of anti-semitism like many other nations. Your mischaracterization of the ADL that they turn people into anti semites is a well worn jew hating trope from the very same jew haters they call out in the first place.

But you aren't one of those kind of people are you?

Shylock is a character from a play by Shakespeare, and dates from around 400 years ago. If Shakespeare offends you, you may want to seek a safe space, and assume the fetal position.

Yes he is. And invoking the character as have you to suggest an organization is inhabited by the lying greedy jews of Shakespearean literature is a classic example of jew hate (I use the term in lieu of anti-semitism since it is so much more descriptive).
 
Not "brimming" but certainly with a long history of anti-semitism like many other nations.

That's not how the ADL characterizes Ukraine or Eastern Europe. They were also part of the choreographed accusations against Poland, which are more ridiculous than what they've said about Ukraine. Most of the world's jews lived in Poland prior to the second world war. Benjamin Netanyahu is Polish. Where's the rampant antisemitism in these countries?

Your mischaracterization of the ADL that they turn people into anti semites is a well worn jew hating trope from the very same jew haters they call out in the first place.

Quite frankly, that is an asinine argument. No one enjoys being accused of something they aren't guilty of, particularly by people who are not acting in a moral capacity themselves.

But you aren't one of those kind of people are you?

I don't practice virtue signaling for people who practice blackmail. A lot of conservatives do, but I'm not one of them.

Yes he is. And invoking the character as have you to suggest an organization is inhabited by the lying greedy jews of Shakespearean literature is a classic example of jew hate (I use the term in lieu of anti-semitism since it is so much more descriptive).

'Jew-hate' as an edgy, modern replacement for the word antisemitism has been making the rounds lately. You didn't invent it. Other wildly unpopular members of the commentary class like Bari Weiss and Bret Stephens have been slinging the jew-hate term around for years. Stephens even accused a Jewish professor of joo hate, to the bewildered amusement of many. Characterizing a Jewish person who unscrupulously accumulates wealth by immoral means as a Shylock is similar to saying that a man who seduces lots of women is a Don Juan, or an older woman who seduces a young man is a Mrs Robinson. It's just a term they originated from the arts that is sometimes applicable in real life.
 
Adam Schiff's son wearing a Mossad t shirt.

w59x6a5via341.jpg



I have no idea where people get the idea that dual loyalties are a problem with some people.
 
Last edited:
That's not how the ADL characterizes Ukraine or Eastern Europe. They were also part of the choreographed accusations against Poland, which are more ridiculous than what they've said about Ukraine. Most of the world's jews lived in Poland prior to the second world war. Benjamin Netanyahu is Polish. Where's the rampant antisemitism in these countries?

Mischaracterization of ADL's stance, but that is not surprising.

here's what the ADL has found in its global assessment
Ukraine

and I'd have to say their methodology is vastly superior to the screeching of offended jew haters everywhere.

Accusations against Poland? Okay I see where you are coming from now.


Quite frankly, that is an asinine argument. No one enjoys being accused of something they aren't guilty of, particularly by people who are not acting in a moral capacity themselves.

Yes your argument that ADL turns people into anti semites is assinine in the extreme. It also appears you totally ignore the basis for the ADL report and how they arrived at their results.

I have provide evidence, which of course you ad hom, and demand evidence of the evidence I provided you. Do you think you are being clever or are you really that unaware?


I don't practice virtue signaling for people who practice blackmail. A lot of conservatives do, but I'm not one of them.

what a relief.



'Jew-hate' as an edgy, modern replacement for the word antisemitism has been making the rounds lately. You didn't invent it. Other wildly unpopular members of the commentary class like Bari Weiss and Bret Stephens have been slinging the jew-hate term around for years. Stephens even accused a Jewish professor of joo hate, to the bewildered amusement of many. Characterizing a Jewish person who unscrupulously accumulates wealth by immoral means as a Shylock is similar to saying that a man who seduces lots of women is a Don Juan, or an older woman who seduces a young man is a Mrs Robinson. It's just a term they originated from the arts that is sometimes applicable in real life.

Bubby I know I didn't invent it. Its a term that has been around for HUNDREDS of years, well before "anti semitism" which is a political term invented around the beginning of the 20th century.

And yes, jew hate is very descriptive of the type. I get that you wish to dismiss what is a clear bigotted stereotype that has become entrenched in the culture as not being bigotted stereotyping. I do that too, its like characterizing nazi, neofascists and ethno-nationalists as scumbag racist garbage.
 
Back
Top Bottom