Then quote yourself giving the definition.
"Those most commonly identified as progressives tend to be very left-leaning economically, socially liberal, against corporatism and against neoconservatism."
I'll go you further:
"The progressive movement emerged in the 1890s and included intellectual reformers typified by sociologist Lester Frank Ward and economist Richard T. Ely.[47] They transformed Victorian liberalism, retaining its commitment to civil liberties and individual rights while casting off its advocacy of laissez-faire economics. Ward helped define what would become the modern welfare state after 1933.[48] These often supported the
growing working-class labor unions and sometimes even the socialists to their left. The Social Gospel movement was a Protestant intellectual movement that helped shape liberalism especially from the 1890s to the 1920s. It applied Christian ethics to social problems, especially issues of
social justice such as economic inequality, poverty, alcoholism, crime, racial tensions, slums, unclean environment, child labor, inadequate labor unions, poor schools and the danger of war."
...
"In 1900–1920, liberals called themselves progressives. They rallied behind Republicans led by Theodore Roosevelt and Robert M. La Follette as well as Democrats led by William Jennings Bryan and Woodrow Wilson to
fight corruption, waste and big trusts (monopolies). They stressed ideals of social justice and the use of government to solve social and economic problems. Settlement workers such as Jane Addams were leaders of the liberal tradition.[52] There was a tension between sympathy with labor unions and the goal to apply scientific expertise by disinterested experts. When liberals became anti-Communist in the 1940s, they purged leftists from the liberal movement.[53]"
I did. You apparently didn't understand the answer.
No, you excluded and refused to recognize definitions which opposed your singular definition. Again, you don't seem to understand these basic concepts, and are not motivated in trying to understand them. Let me make it easy for you:
Modern liberalism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Modern liberalism in the United States is the
dominant version of liberalism in the United States. It combines ideas of civil liberty and equality with support for social justice and a mixed economy."
...
"The American modern liberal philosophy strongly endorses
public spending on programs such as education, health care and welfare.
Important social issues during the first part of the 21st century include economic inequality (wealth and income),[5] voting rights for minorities,[6] affirmative action,[7] reproductive and other women's rights,[8] support for LGBT rights[9][10] and immigration reform.[11][12]"
...
Modern liberalism took shape during the 20th century, with roots in Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism, Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom, Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, Harry S. Truman's Fair Deal, John F. Kennedy's New Frontier and Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society.
American liberals oppose conservatives on most but not all issues. Modern liberalism is historically related to social liberalism and progressivism, although the current relationship between liberal and progressive viewpoints is debated.
Get it now? Or rather, what DON'T you get?
I'm sorry; where exactly does that say the definition of "centrist" includes "corporatist"? You're not making leaps, you're pole-vaulting.
Perhaps I went over your head. To borrow from Colbert, if someone is stabbing you with a knife and ultimately kills you, they don't have to scream, 'Murder! Murder! Murder!' in order for it to be murder.
The point in my quotes, borrowed from your links, is that billionaires and millionaires, and those who take money from such, are heavily invested in virtually every brand of American centrism. That's the point. Do you get it now?
I'm stating definitions and giving sources for them, something you've almost entirely steadfastly refused to do.
No, you link to definitions, and when these links are used to your disadvantage, you flatly claim that nothing but your variant of the definition is applicable. You've done this repeatedly throughout our so-called discussion. I challenged you several times, and I'll do it again: What is the difference between Classical Liberalism and Modern Liberalism? Which is the most commonly recognized version used by non-Libertarians?
I'm sure that's what you tell yourself.
Not that my ego is invested in our exchange, but I'm dragging you and you don't realize it.