• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TYT's Cenk asks media, 'Are you doing your job AT ALL?'

Geoist: Now that you have been provided additional info, with sourcing, without the need to click on TYT links, are you still comfortable with Mayor Pete? Honest question, not trying to get under your skin.


I read something about a report that some lobbyists worked behind the scenes to get the sheriff fired. Did I get that right? Nothing about that is unusual or inherently corrupt. No one forced that sheriff to record those officers.
 
I read something about a report that some lobbyists worked behind the scenes to get the sheriff fired. Did I get that right? Nothing about that is unusual or inherently corrupt. No one forced that sheriff to record those officers.

Come on, man. Did you even look at the screen shots?
 
I thought he changed his mind on the issue, but maybe not. After looking it up, he apparently rescinded the article he wrote stating he was ‘not a scholar on the subject’ but hasn’t come out and acknowledged the genocide happened.

I don’t know what motivates Kasparian, but she has been weirdly defensive about the topic. The name for the show is connected to a group that was responsible for genocide. For someone who think words like ‘redskin’ should be banned and that words matter, he can be a bit of a hypocrite.

If you haven't done any research into it, why are you using it as a line to deflect criticism away from Pete Buttigieg?
 
If you haven't done any research into it, why are you using it as a line to deflect criticism away from Pete Buttigieg?

I have done research in the past and, based on memory, I had thought he expressed regret and therefore changed his mind on the issue. Well, he expressed regret, but I see nothing about him changing his mind.

It was not a deflection. I explained why I am not going to click on a TYT video and it all went from there.
 
Yes, you posted screen shots without presenting your thoughts and context.

I assume you're capable of reviewing the evidence without my editorializing. Am I wrong? I can put it in my own words, but it seems rather redundant when you have the sourcing.

I have done research in the past and, based on memory, I had thought he expressed regret and therefore changed his mind on the issue. Well, he expressed regret, but I see nothing about him changing his mind.

Cenk fully accepts the Armenian genocide for what it is. He even expressed this recently on the air, when discussing Trump's betrayal of the Kurds. I would post the link but since you flatly refuse to follow them, I don't see the point.

It was not a deflection. I explained why I am not going to click on a TYT video and it all went from there.

Well now you've been given new information regarding Cenk, so are we done with the Armenian genocide denial angle as it pertains to this topic?

There are also black conservatives.

Yes, there are. What are you suggesting here?
 
I assume you're capable of reviewing the evidence without my editorializing. Am I wrong? I can put it in my own words, but it seems rather redundant when you have the sourcing.

I read the screen shots. Now I’d like to know what you find so damning.



Cenk fully accepts the Armenian genocide for what it is. He even expressed this recently on the air, when discussing Trump's betrayal of the Kurds. I would post the link but since you flatly refuse to follow them, I don't see the point.

All I need is a quote from Cenk saying he acknowledges the Armenian Genocide occurred.



Well now you've been given new information regarding Cenk, so are we done with the Armenian genocide denial angle as it pertains to this topic?

What new information are you referring to?



Yes, there are. What are you suggesting here?

The fact Ana is Armenian doesn’t prove anything.
 
Cenk is the personification of the Left eating their own. This is not to say Pete or Biden are above critique, but TYT has a weird obsession with Pete just because he isn’t ‘progressive enough.’

Having gone through their videos, they're actually pretty light on Buttigieg coverage versus other things; not entirely sure how you're walking away with a notion of obsession.
 
I read the screen shots. Now I’d like to know what you find so damning.

Sure thing. A group of police officers, engaging in KKK levels of racism, were recorded plotting a conspiracy to oust the first black sheriff of South Bend for purely racist reasons, using Buttigieg's donors to leverage and manipulate him. Buttigieg was manipulated on two levels; by his donors, and by the racist police officers. Release the tapes.

All I need is a quote from Cenk saying he acknowledges the Armenian Genocide occurred.

You're going to have to swallow your pride and watch this clip, because I am done with this line of BS.



What new information are you referring to?

The facts of which you were completely unaware, and as of this post, have no excuse for not being aware of. I don't want to hear that you didn't watch the video. You have the proof in front of you.

The fact Ana is Armenian doesn’t prove anything.

Correct, it doesn't. The above video is all we need.
 
Having gone through their videos, they're actually pretty light on Buttigieg coverage versus other things; not entirely sure how you're walking away with a notion of obsession.

Versus other things or versus critiques of other candidates? I would guess they likely have more anti-Biden videos but I’ve only seen them go after those two.
 
Why does everyone insist on linking articles without context?...

It is not like I have nothing to do in my day but read articles to try and find what snippets people are referring to.

I don't know what 'linking articles without context' means. The context is in the article. People do this so that they don't get accused of cherry-picking sections of the article. Neither article are heavy reads.
 
Sure thing. A group of police officers, engaging in KKK levels of racism, were recorded plotting a conspiracy to oust the first black sheriff of South Bend for purely racist reasons, using Buttigieg's donors to leverage and manipulate him. Buttigieg was manipulated on two levels; by his donors, and by the racist police officers. Release the tapes.

The sheriff illegally recorded officers and paid the price. Not that hard to understand.



You're going to have to swallow your pride and watch this clip, because I am done with this line of BS.



I don’t know why this is a pride thing to you. I am simply asking for evidence.

Great to see Cenk acknowledging the genocide now. That video was posted... last May? And yet, I’m supposed to know he finally acknowledged something, half a year ago, everyone else in America knows after skirting the issue for decades?

So now he can change the disgusting name of his network, right?
 
I don't know what 'linking articles without context' means. The context is in the article. People do this so that they don't get accused of cherry-picking sections of the article. Neither article are heavy reads.


Cite evidence and quotes from articles and give context. You should have been doing this in high school and college. Not going to do your guys’ homework.
 
Compromise got ACA. It isn’t perfect but it is better than what we had before. If Obama went all in on single payer do you think it would have gotten through with the moderate/neoliberal/blue dog Democrats? I don’t think so.

As it turns out it was only Lieberman who killed the Public Option.
Simply put, Obama and the Dems underestimated the Republican messaging machine.
We VASTLY underestimated what it would take to counter their propaganda efforts.
In fact, had we taken an amount equal to what we've spent SINCE to prop up continuing efforts to keep ACA alive, and devoted it all at once to a massive counter campaign, we might have won the Public Option.
 
The sheriff illegally recorded officers and paid the price. Not that hard to understand.

Apparently everything about this issue is hard for you to understand if that's your takeaway. I cut up the issue and spoon-fed it to you, as requested, and you still don't understand it.

I don’t know why this is a pride thing to you. I am simply asking for evidence.

The pride thing was you and your inability to follow links.

'I won't give them my click!'

Please.

Great to see Cenk acknowledging the genocide now. That video was posted... last May? And yet, I’m supposed to know he finally acknowledged something, half a year ago, everyone else in America knows after skirting the issue for decades?

You brought up the point, it's your responsibility to know what you're talking about.

So now he can change the disgusting name of his network, right?

Everyone has to jump through your hoops, and in the end, it's never good enough. If they changed the name you'd just move the goal post.
 
All I need is a quote from Cenk saying he acknowledges the Armenian Genocide occurred.

Geo, Cenk and the entire TYT team have always acknowledged the Armenian Genocide.
Cenk Uygur started out his career as a kid, a Republican kid, with all that entails. PRIOR TO EVEN dreaming of TYT.

He evolved his views on the genocide around the same time he evolved all of his other views, when he became aligned with the political Left. Liz Warren started out as a Republican. Elliot Abrams was a campus leftist radical in college.

It happens.
 
Cite evidence and quotes from articles and give context. You should have been doing this in high school and college. Not going to do your guys’ homework.

Again, you came into this thread making claims about TYT's bias, how they are genocide deniers, how it's all about sabotaging Mayor Pete because he's a pragmatist. Yet you haven't done the bare minimum effort to effectively participate in this discussion or substantiate your own points. So I would turn it around and ask you why you're not interested enough to do the research.
 
Versus other things or versus critiques of other candidates? I would guess they likely have more anti-Biden videos but I’ve only seen them go after those two.

I mean they're staunchly progressive FDR democrats (and are upfront about this), they're not going to:

A: Blast candidates they agree with more than those they don't, but they can and do critique Warren and Sanders.

B: Routinely critique candidates that don't have the support to be credible contenders.

Overall and either way, there's not nearly the level of coverage of Buttigieg that would suggest 'obsession'. They clearly (and justifiably IMO) dislike the guy, but that's about it.


As to 'linking without context', if you wanted an explanation of the findings of TYT's investigative journalism without supporting them via incrementing their clicks/views, and why Buttigieg doesn't really come out of this looking good, I've provided it. The majority of the first article is relevant. The summation of the second article is that the recordings weren't necessarily unlawful.
 
Last edited:
With all these deeply flawed Democrats running, the only good choice is to KEEP AMERICA GREAT in 2020!
 
Apparently everything about this issue is hard for you to understand if that's your takeaway. I cut up the issue and spoon-fed it to you, as requested, and you still don't understand it.

Show me specifically where I was wrong when I said the sheriff illegally taped officers.



The pride thing was you and your inability to follow links.

'I won't give them my click!'

Please.

I didn't know sticking by principles is related to pride.



You brought up the point, it's your responsibility to know what you're talking about.

I told you why I haven't been giving TYT my clicks. It is not my responsibility to monitor it whenever Cenk changes his opinion. You guys are being ridiculous.



Everyone has to jump through your hoops, and in the end, it's never good enough. If they changed the name you'd just move the goal post.

He expects Washington to change the name of their team. He should set the example.
 
Back
Top Bottom