Trump's Dangerous Threats Against the Media

Aberration said:

I don’t care. Officers are notoriously anti-gun too. He should stick to paddling boats in his pond. Just because the President criticizes the press doesn’t mean the press has been oppressed or there is even the slightest risk to the 1st. Criticism hold no legal weight. And the President doesn’t lose his 1st Amendment rights.

Click to expand...

The president took his oath and wiped his ass with it.

It was a same day turnaround. Putin-Trump Rowers have been daily handing him rolls of it since.

Now Trump is all but begging to get his ass handed back to him. He's on course for it to happen. It looks inevitable in fact. The only question is when, before the election or after it.

Tangmo said:

The president took his oath and wiped his ass with it.

It was a same day turnaround. Putin-Trump Rowers have been daily handing him rolls of it since.

Now Trump is all but begging to get his ass handed back to him. He's on course for it to happen. It looks inevitable in fact. The only question is when, before the election or after it.

Click to expand...

Repetitious nonsense...

Get new material.

bomberfox said:

Antifascism is self defense.

Click to expand...

Throwing a senior citizen to the ground for simply holding an American flag, is antifascism...?

Not to mention the fire bombings, countless instigated assaults, terroristic threats on speaking events, vandalisms, not to mention turning a large portion of Portland into a biological hazard...

You have a strange definition of self defense.

Oborosen said:

Throwing a senior citizen to the ground for simply holding an American flag, is antifascism...?

Not to mention the fire bombings, countless instigated assaults, terroristic threats on speaking events, vandalisms, not to mention turning a large portion of Portland into a biological hazard...

You have a strange definition of self defense.

Click to expand...

If that is all the old man did (i dont know the story) then no. The most recent old man thing was the guy in portland that was carrying a baton similar to what the police use to hit people with. In that case, yes.

Fire bombings of UC Berkely was inexcusable and i said in the hannity forum that all who were involved in those fire bombings/assault should be arrested. If you want my opinion of various assaults, etc you will need to be specific. Dont know where you get the bio hazard from.

Frigidweirdo said:

The Founding Fathers foresaw people like Trump and for that very reason put in the First Amendment.

He's clearly not a fan of the Constitution at all.

Click to expand...

Newsweek, 1/3/18

As a candidate for president, Donald Trump didn't understand the Constitution—and didn't want to learn about it, a key campaign aide said.

"I got as far as the Fourth Amendment, before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head," Sam Nunberg, a former adviser to the Trump campaign, said in Michael Wolff's bombshell new book, Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, excerpted Wednesday in New York magazine.

The book offers a bird's-eye view of Oval Office dysfunction courtesy of Wolff, who was given rare access and conducted scores of interviews with Trump and his inner circle after the 2016 election, but the candidate's lack of concern for constitutional basics remains a theme in his presidency.

Former Trump Adviser Says He Tried to Teach President the Constitution, but His Eyes Just Rolled Back in His Head

The Mercury News, August 9, 2016
WILMINGTON, N.C. (AP) — Donald Trump suggested Tuesday that if Hillary Clinton is able to pick federal judges as president, nothing could be done to protect the right to bear arms. He then added, without elaboration, that supporters of the Second Amendment could maybe figure out a way.

Speaking at a rally in Wilmington, North Carolina, the Republican nominee incorrectly said his general election opponent wants to “essentially abolish the Second Amendment.”

He continued: “By the way, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”...

Catherine Milhoan, a spokeswoman for the Secret Service, said: “We are aware of his comments.” She declined to answer any additional questions about Trump’s remarks...

Trump’s comments Tuesday also come a few weeks after one of his campaign advisers said that “Hillary Clinton should be put in the firing line and shot for treason.”

The Secret Service is investigating those remarks, made last month by Al Baldasaro, a New Hampshire state lawmaker and an adviser to Trump on veterans issues.

Donald Trump’s ‘Second Amendment’ solution: Did he advocate violence against Clinton, judges? – The Mercury News


Many Trump supporters are dangerously unhinged. They blame their problems on non whites, Jews (who they do not think are white) and liberals, rather than the fact that computers and industrial robots are eliminating the jobs they have the intelligence to learn, and they lack the intelligence to learn sophisticated job skills. They are no longer necessary.

bomberfox said:

If that is all the old man did (i dont know the story) then no. The most recent old man thing was the guy in portland that was carrying a baton similar to what the police use to hit people with. In that case, yes.

Fire bombings of UC Berkely was inexcusable and i said in the hannity forum that all who were involved in those fire bombings/assault should be arrested. If you want my opinion of various assaults, etc you will need to be specific. Dont know where you get the bio hazard from.

Click to expand...

It was the occupy ICE protest they held, and camped out across the street from one of their buildings.

The senior citizen was a woman who was just holding the flag. Someone snatched it and the cord was synched on her arm, but that didn't stop them from dragging her about a dozen feet over the ground.

The fact of the matter is, that practically none of this could possibly pass for a self defense claim.