• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rickeroo's official CNN challenge thread

Mid-day update. CNN chose to identify an "American" as being "Somali" in some fashion:

Capture.JPG

This identification is paramount - it is the top story on CNN currently.
 
It was a lie designed to fabricate an excuse for you to race-bait.

It would be too great a compliment to call your claim that mentioning the race of a person = "talking about race" disingenuous, in the way that you are trying to use it.

Talking about race or mentioning race is fine. When it's put into an adversarial context, that's when it becomes harmful. Call it race baiting, call it racial vomit, race puke, whatever you like. I'll let CNN's "casual mention of race" headlines speak for themselves.
 
This one was last Saturday, I was on vacation and it was the top story, excuse the 'mobile' format. We have a classic "race versus race" theme, with the races of course being white and black. Asians and Hispanics simply wouldn't do.

Capture.JPG
 
It was a lie designed to fabricate an excuse for you to race-bait.

That's what this thread is. Someone got the green-light from Papa Donnie and didn't waste a day getting to it.
 
This qualifies as race. A combination of the term "wearing Hijab" plus a photo of an Arab-looking woman cements the racial "significance" of the article:

Capture.JPG

In other words, the significance of the story rests solely on race. Story not published if the person was white.
 
This qualifies as race. A combination of the term "wearing Hijab" plus a photo of an Arab-looking woman cements the racial "significance" of the article:

View attachment 67260917

In other words, the significance of the story rests solely on race. Story not published if the person was white.

I do not know of any white woman who wears a hijab.
 
I do not know of any white woman who wears a hijab.

I'm glad you think so. "Wearing hijab" is officially not a race, so it's a stretch to include it in this thread. However, I think it's indicative enough of race to be included. While true that she looks more black than Arab, this is a minor point. The significance of her racial identity is that she is not white.
 
I'm glad you think so. "Wearing hijab" is officially not a race, so it's a stretch to include it in this thread. However, I think it's indicative enough of race to be included. While true that she looks more black than Arab, this is a minor point. The significance of her racial identity is that she is not white.

The challenge is for CNN not to mention race or racism. This isn't one of them.
 
The challenge is for CNN not to mention race or racism. This isn't one of them.

So this 'wearing hijab' article does not count as CNN mentioning race? No white women wear the hijab, as you've said. Would the article have been published if a white woman was the jockey? The answers to these questions point heavily to a race-oriented article, so I put it up as an example.
 
This one was last Saturday, I was on vacation and it was the top story, excuse the 'mobile' format. We have a classic "race versus race" theme, with the races of course being white and black. Asians and Hispanics simply wouldn't do.

View attachment 67260880


It is a good story. McWhirter is a progressive so he will not tell you that all those attacking mobs were democrats from top to bottom.

Those curious enough to dig a little deeper into "Red Summer" will pierce the veil of obfuscation. He cannot help himself but to shift focus away from the truth about who treats whom badly and why..

 
It is a good story. McWhirter is a progressive so he will not tell you that all those attacking mobs were democrats from top to bottom.

Those curious enough to dig a little deeper into "Red Summer" will pierce the veil of obfuscation. He cannot help himself but to shift focus away from the truth about who treats whom badly and why..



Many thanks. Unfortunately, the media goes to great lengths to differentiate between the races, using extreme examples from the past in their quest for segregation.
 
One of my favorites, the one that uses a general term to specifically exclude white people:

Capture.JPG
 
I've been accused of "always talking about race", so I made a deal with a poster that I'd stop talking about race on this board once CNN goes 7 days without talking about race. Of course, they "have to" talk about race when Trump talks about race, so I won't count any 'Trump is a racist" articles from CNN, to make it fair.

I can't go digging either - the racebait must be located directly on CNN's front page, and I have to provide a screenshot.

I'll keep track of them here.
OP's thread is self-serving, childish, and ignorant.
 
I was getting a bit nervous, it went to 5pm EST without racially identifying an American citizen. CNN came through for me though, pointing out the race of a GOP congressman:

View attachment 67260115

My "ceasefire" on race is pushed up to July 24th.

You know it's funny that when you read these articles. They don't even come close to showing how the "jabs" are actually racist.

It's really funny actually.
 
You know it's funny that when you read these articles. They don't even come close to showing how the "jabs" are actually racist.

It's really funny actually.

Racial identification and qualification is paramount to all the CNN stories I've posted here. While not "racist" in nature, it certainly is very racial - race is the core. I'm actually on CNN's side here - if society (as defined by CNN) wants to be race-based, then we need a better system of quantifying race scientifically.
 
I've been accused of "always talking about race", so I made a deal with a poster that I'd stop talking about race on this board once CNN goes 7 days without talking about race. Of course, they "have to" talk about race when Trump talks about race, so I won't count any 'Trump is a racist" articles from CNN, to make it fair.

I can't go digging either - the racebait must be located directly on CNN's front page, and I have to provide a screenshot.

I'll keep track of them here.

I would guess that you're convinced that white people are the truly oppressed race in this discussion and that CNN needs to be made aware of that.
Am I wrong?
 
It is a good story. McWhirter is a progressive so he will not tell you that all those attacking mobs were democrats from top to bottom.

Those curious enough to dig a little deeper into "Red Summer" will pierce the veil of obfuscation. He cannot help himself but to shift focus away from the truth about who treats whom badly and why..



Replied to the wrong post.
 
Last edited:
So this 'wearing hijab' article does not count as CNN mentioning race? No white women wear the hijab, as you've said. Would the article have been published if a white woman was the jockey? The answers to these questions point heavily to a race-oriented article, so I put it up as an example.

I know two white women who have worn a hijab.

Bec Hijab.jpg

Bec Hijab2.jpg
 
This one was last Saturday, I was on vacation and it was the top story, excuse the 'mobile' format. We have a classic "race versus race" theme, with the races of course being white and black. Asians and Hispanics simply wouldn't do.

View attachment 67260880

Do you have a problem with history being taught?
Are you saying that the picture is of some false flag operation? Was Q alive back then or something? George Soros and Hillary?
 
I would guess that you're convinced that white people are the truly oppressed race in this discussion and that CNN needs to be made aware of that.
Am I wrong?

Actually, quite the opposite. CNN's stories are geared towards blacks depending on whites for their fortunes. If a black fails, it's a white person's fault. Whites profit from black misery: the more blacks that get shot in Baltimore, the more I profit as a white person. This is the race garbage CNN puts out. In order to accomplish this, CNN must hold the white race in higher esteem - a position of racial power over blacks.


When I point out CNN's race articles, it's to show the superior / inferior relationship between white and black, as put forth by CNN. In order to internalize the white / black relationship in the media narrative, I pretend white / black is replaced with Asian / white. Asians, who have socially superior statistics than whites, would be blamed for white misfortunes, and white people are dependent on Asian sentiment in order to better themselves. Asians would be reminded in the Asian-dominated press to refer to white people only by the proper politically correct terms. Asians putting down poor white counties in Kentucky would be 'racist'.

Thankfully, as part and parcel of the race narrative, CNN actually uplifts whites over Asians - they need to do this in order to maintain blacks on the lower rung of the race ladder, as defined by whites being in the highest rung. At no point in time will my white race be blamed for inferior math and computer skills relative to Asians, or inferior income relative to Asians. My race must be held in the highest esteem, for the express purpose of lowering blacks.

I thank CNN for allowing me to be an individual and not depend on the superior Asians for charity.
 
Actually, quite the opposite. CNN's stories are geared towards blacks depending on whites for their fortunes.

Are we talking about "the CNN in your mind?"
I thought we were talking about the cable news network.
 
It's a busy front page today with the double mass shootings, but I found a gem:

Capture.JPG

Last week, the family and I went to the Jersey shore on vacation. I didn't consider it at the time, but based on our race, we must have been engaging in "white travel". I did see a couple of black people there, so they must have been engaging in "black travel".
 
Another one here:

Capture.JPG

In one of the country's 'healthiest' states, obesity plagues black and Hispanic people - CNN

It follows the trend of why CNN considers "black" and "Hispanic" important: those races must be compared to the Reference Race. Black and Hispanic statistics are meaningless on their own - they must be compared to whites. Here's the line which does that:

far worse than the 21.6% rate for non-Hispanic whites

In this case, whites are defined as "pure white" by specifically excluding the often elusive "white Hispanic".
 
Will he make an MSNBC dares to mention peoples' races thread?
 
Back
Top Bottom