• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hannity accused of hypocrisy on 'lock her up'

uptower

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
20,005
Reaction score
17,067
Location
Behind you - run!
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Hannity accused of hypocrisy on 'lock her up' | TheHill

"Fox News host Sean Hannity is getting criticized for hypocrisy after criticizing Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) comments about wanting to see President Trump in prison as "despicable," but essentially supporting the famous cheers from President Trump's rallies directed toward Hillary Clinton of "lock her up."


We see this time and again from the right: McConnell on SCOTUS picks, now Hannity on lock her up, Trump on a daily basis about everything: complete about face when it is expedient, totally shameless.

So tell us red hats, why is it okay to call for Hillary to go to jail over a few emails, but not trump for obstruction.
 
Hannity accused of hypocrisy on 'lock her up' | TheHill

"Fox News host Sean Hannity is getting criticized for hypocrisy after criticizing Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) comments about wanting to see President Trump in prison as "despicable," but essentially supporting the famous cheers from President Trump's rallies directed toward Hillary Clinton of "lock her up."


We see this time and again from the right: McConnell on SCOTUS picks, now Hannity on lock her up, Trump on a daily basis about everything: complete about face when it is expedient, totally shameless.

So tell us red hats, why is it okay to call for Hillary to go to jail over a few emails, but not trump for obstruction.

Here come the 'What the hell obstruction did trump commit responses are you referring to"' ? in 3.....2....1
 
Hannity did something that shows he's a hypocrite? Must be Friday. :roll:

To be fair, everyone is a hypocrite sooner or later, and detection and care about hypocrisy is thrown off by partisanship. (I.e. someone on "your side" who is a hypocrite is easily forgiven, whereas someone on the "other side" who is a hypocrite gets tarred and feathered.)

But yes, it's pretty clear that Hannity et al are employing egregious double standards.
 
Here come the 'What the hell obstruction did trump commit responses are you referring to"' ? in 3.....2....1

Or they'll try to shift the goalpost with "obstruction of what?" That one's easy: Justice. Obstruction of Justice. Like Nixon. A crime.
 
Hannity is as mentally ill as his idol Trump is. They both live in the FOX alternate reality in their own right wing world. Both need to be removed ASAP.
 
Hannity accused of hypocrisy on 'lock her up' | TheHill

"Fox News host Sean Hannity is getting criticized for hypocrisy after criticizing Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) comments about wanting to see President Trump in prison as "despicable," but essentially supporting the famous cheers from President Trump's rallies directed toward Hillary Clinton of "lock her up."


We see this time and again from the right: McConnell on SCOTUS picks, now Hannity on lock her up, Trump on a daily basis about everything: complete about face when it is expedient, totally shameless.

So tell us red hats, why is it okay to call for Hillary to go to jail over a few emails, but not trump for obstruction.

if my team [choose a color] is doing it, then it is only hard ball politics used to win the game
if it is your team [other color], then it is hypocritical

fortunately, this is most evident at the extremes of the color spectrums
 
Hannity accused of hypocrisy on 'lock her up' | TheHill

"Fox News host Sean Hannity is getting criticized for hypocrisy after criticizing Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) comments about wanting to see President Trump in prison as "despicable," but essentially supporting the famous cheers from President Trump's rallies directed toward Hillary Clinton of "lock her up."


We see this time and again from the right: McConnell on SCOTUS picks, now Hannity on lock her up, Trump on a daily basis about everything: complete about face when it is expedient, totally shameless.

So tell us red hats, why is it okay to call for Hillary to go to jail over a few emails, but not trump for obstruction.

What obstruction?

Do you mean the Democrats of the FBI and DOJ obstructing justice such as altering transcripts in an official document - the exact definition in the law of "obstruction of justice" - or do you mean lying to the FISA court?
 
Here come the 'What the hell obstruction did trump commit responses are you referring to"' ? in 3.....2....1

And here it is:

What obstruction?

Do you mean the Democrats of the FBI and DOJ obstructing justice such as altering transcripts in an official document - the exact definition in the law of "obstruction of justice" - or do you mean lying to the FISA court?

No the ten instances of Trump obstructing justice as outlined in the Mueller report.

Yes they are listed by the press as 'potential' because the newswire is not a court or congress. Yet these are enough to begin impeachment proceedings - or at least they were with Nixon. This is how guilt is determined or not.

But the point remains there is far more dirt on trump than they had on Clinton yet they called for her to be jailed and are suddenly disgusted when someone calls for the same to happen to their guy. Hypocrites.
 
Hannity is a BIG target because of his fantastic ratings!! :mrgreen:

As May winds down to a close, Fox News Channel is finishing the month as the most-watched network across all of basic cable for the 35th straight month. Simultaneously, CNN is continuing a downward turn, finishing eighth in total day viewers, averaging only 552,000. 'Hannity' averaged 3.1 million viewers, finishing as the most-watched program on cable news, while CNN's most-watched show, 'Cuomo Prime Time,' finished 25th overall.
 
Hannity is a BIG target because of his fantastic ratings!! :mrgreen:

As May winds down to a close, Fox News Channel is finishing the month as the most-watched network across all of basic cable for the 35th straight month. Simultaneously, CNN is continuing a downward turn, finishing eighth in total day viewers, averaging only 552,000. 'Hannity' averaged 3.1 million viewers, finishing as the most-watched program on cable news, while CNN's most-watched show, 'Cuomo Prime Time,' finished 25th overall.


 
Hannity is a BIG target because of his fantastic ratings!! :mrgreen:

As May winds down to a close, Fox News Channel is finishing the month as the most-watched network across all of basic cable for the 35th straight month. Simultaneously, CNN is continuing a downward turn, finishing eighth in total day viewers, averaging only 552,000. 'Hannity' averaged 3.1 million viewers, finishing as the most-watched program on cable news, while CNN's most-watched show, 'Cuomo Prime Time,' finished 25th overall.

No one is debating his ratings. Try to talk about the topic rather than proving that the right are all lemmings.
 
Hannity is a BIG target because of his fantastic ratings!! :mrgreen:

Obviously if he ran some tinpot county radio show, nobody would notice him. Being influential does indeed make him a target. So does lying, obfuscating and being intellectually dishonest. Nobody would care about his negative traits if they hadn't made him famous.
 
Hannity accused of hypocrisy on 'lock her up' | TheHill

"Fox News host Sean Hannity is getting criticized for hypocrisy after criticizing Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) comments about wanting to see President Trump in prison as "despicable," but essentially supporting the famous cheers from President Trump's rallies directed toward Hillary Clinton of "lock her up."


We see this time and again from the right: McConnell on SCOTUS picks, now Hannity on lock her up, Trump on a daily basis about everything: complete about face when it is expedient, totally shameless.

So tell us red hats, why is it okay to call for Hillary to go to jail over a few emails, but not trump for obstruction.

But we know the answer before we see it: it's different such that Hillary is guilty and Trump is innocent [insert lies, BS, hyperbole, minimalizing, etc., focusing on the things that are different without any discussion of why that difference is relevant.]
 
Hannity used to be good when he had Alan Colmes with him to keep his idiocy in check. Now he's just pathetic. His guests are a joke. How many times does anyone need to hear Sebastian Gorka's idiotic ramblings or Joe DiGenova's conspiracy theories?

Of course he's a hypocrite. All Trump lovers who chanted "lock her up" are hypocrites for pissing in their panties about what Pelosi said.
 
Here come the 'What the hell obstruction did trump commit responses are you referring to"' ? in 3.....2....1

A look at the 10 instances:

___

PRESSURE ON COMEY TO END PROBE OF MICHAEL FLYNN

This includes the president’s statement to then-FBI Director James Comey regarding the investigation of then-national security adviser Michael Flynn. Trump told Comey: “I hope you can see your way to letting this go.”

___

PRESIDENT’S REACTION TO THE CONTINUING RUSSIA INVESTIGATION

Among the evidence is the president telling then-White House counsel Don McGahn to stop Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself from the Russia investigation and Trump’s subsequent anger at Sessions. Trump also contacted Comey and other intelligence agency leaders to ask them to push back publicly on the suggestion that Trump had any connection to the Russian election-interference effort.

___

FIRING OF COMEY AND AFTERMATH

Mueller’s report says “substantial evidence” indicates Trump’s decision to fire Comey in May 2017 was the result of the FBI director’s unwillingness to say publicly that Trump was not personally under investigation. On the day after Trump fired Comey, the president told Russian officials that he had “faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND EFFORTS TO REMOVE HIM

Trump reacted to news of Mueller’s appointment by telling advisers that it was “the end of his presidency.” The president told aides that Mueller had conflicts of interest and should have to step aside. His aides told Trump the asserted conflicts were meritless. Following media reports that Mueller’s team was investigating whether the president had obstructed justice, Trump called then-White House counsel Don McGahn at home and directed him to have Mueller removed. McGahn refused.

____

FURTHER EFFORTS TO CURTAIL THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’s INVESTIGATION

Trump instructed former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to have Sessions publicly announce that, notwithstanding his recusal from the Russia investigation, the investigation was “very unfair” to the president, the president had done nothing wrong, and Sessions planned to meet with Mueller to limit him to “investigating election meddling for future elections.”

___

EFFORTS TO PREVENT PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE

In summer of 2017, Trump learned that the news media planned to report on the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between senior campaign officials and Russians offering derogatory information about Hillary Clinton. The president directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails setting up the meeting. Before the emails became public, the president also edited a press statement for Donald Trump Jr. by deleting a line that acknowledged that the meeting was “with an individual who (Trump Jr.) was told might have information helpful to the campaign.”

___

ADDITIONAL EFFORTS TO HAVE SESSIONS TAKE CONTROL OF INVESTIGATION

At several points in between July 2017 and December 2017, Trump tried to get Sessions to declare that he was no longer recused from the Russia investigation and would assert control over it. The report says there’s evidence that one purpose of asking Sessions to step in was so that the attorney general would restrict the investigation’s scope.

___

TRUMP ORDERS WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL TO DENY THAT PRESIDENT TRIED TO FIRE MUELLER

In an Oval Office meeting in February 2018, Trump told McGahn to “correct” a New York Times story that reported Trump had earlier instructed McGahn to fire Mueller. Trump also asked why McGahn had told Mueller’s investigators about the directive to remove Mueller. McGahn told Trump he had to tell the investigators the truth.

___

TRUMP’S ACTIONS TOWARD, FLYNN, MANAFORT AND OTHER POSSIBLE WITNESSES

Mueller looked at whether Trump’s sympathetic messages to Flynn, former campaign manager Paul Manafort and others were intended to limit their cooperation with Mueller’s investigation. When Flynn began cooperating with prosecutors, Trump passed word through his lawyer that he still had warm feeling for Flynn and asked for a “heads up” if Flynn knew of information implicating Trump. Trump praised Manafort during and after his criminal convictions, and refused to rule out a pardon for his former campaign chairman.

___

TRUMP ACTIONS TOWARD MICHAEL COHEN

Mueller noted that Trump’s conduct toward Cohen, a former Trump Organization executive, changed from praise to castigation after Cohen began cooperating with prosecutors. The evidence could “support an inference that the president used inducements in the form of positive messages in an effort to get Cohen not to cooperate, and then turned to attacks and intimidation to deter” cooperation and undermine Cohen’s credibility, Mueller wrote.

Waiting some kind of rebuttal in 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 --........,
 
Last edited:
What obstruction?

Do you mean the Democrats of the FBI and DOJ obstructing justice such as altering transcripts in an official document - the exact definition in the law of "obstruction of justice" - or do you mean lying to the FISA court?

Prove that.
 
But we know the answer before we see it: it's different such that Hillary is guilty and Trump is innocent [insert lies, BS, hyperbole, minimalizing, etc., focusing on the things that are different without any discussion of why that difference is relevant.]

Hillary Clinton was never the subject of an FBI counter-terrorist investigation, nor has she ever been indicted of any crimes. She endured an 11 hour grilling by Congress regarding Benghazi and was exonerated. Trump would never even agree to be interviewed by Robert Mueller because he's such a liar that he would incriminate himself in five minutes if he ever gave live testimony.
 
Hannity is the Captain of the Trump cheerleader squad. The problem is that his squad has too much of a credibility problem to believe any of them. Sebastian Gorka has been a well-known white supremacist for years and has ties to the alt-right. But sure, Trump hired him as his Deputy Asst. and 'strategist'. His white supremacist agenda never got off the ground in the White House since he wan unable to pass a security clearance.

David Bossie is another well known racist who had to apologize for a racist remark he made last year on Fox & Friends. While arguing with Democratic strategist Joel Payne, who is black, Bossie told him, “you’re out of your cotton-picking mind,” It appears that the phrase is a favorite one of Trump's racist friends and the same phrase used by Florida Governor Rick DeSantis when he used it in a phrase referring to candidate Andrew Gillum.

Then there's Laura Ingraham, another Fox white supremacist hosts complained because Facebook sanctioned Alex Jones and Paul Nehlen and banned them from Facebook. Ingraham never characterized them as extremists. Instead, during her segment, she said they’d been “shunned” from social media and called for conservatives to “stand up to these censors.”

Last but certainly not least is Tucker Carlson who dismissed his racist, sexist remarks as "just naughty words". His commentary included Carlson referring to women as “extremely primitive,” questioning President Barack Obama's race and saying Iraq was filled with “semi-literate primitive monkeys.” Last Fall, Tucker Carlson said immigrants made the U.S. “dirtier” and that prompted a far-reaching reprisal, with 20 of his advertisers withdrawing their involvement from the show at the time.

Fox News is a rabid nest of racists and white supremacists.
 
A look at the 10 instances:

___

PRESSURE ON COMEY TO END PROBE OF MICHAEL FLYNN

This includes the president’s statement to then-FBI Director James Comey regarding the investigation of then-national security adviser Michael Flynn. Trump told Comey: “I hope you can see your way to letting this go.”

___

PRESIDENT’S REACTION TO THE CONTINUING RUSSIA INVESTIGATION

Among the evidence is the president telling then-White House counsel Don McGahn to stop Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself from the Russia investigation and Trump’s subsequent anger at Sessions. Trump also contacted Comey and other intelligence agency leaders to ask them to push back publicly on the suggestion that Trump had any connection to the Russian election-interference effort.

___

FIRING OF COMEY AND AFTERMATH

Mueller’s report says “substantial evidence” indicates Trump’s decision to fire Comey in May 2017 was the result of the FBI director’s unwillingness to say publicly that Trump was not personally under investigation. On the day after Trump fired Comey, the president told Russian officials that he had “faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND EFFORTS TO REMOVE HIM

Trump reacted to news of Mueller’s appointment by telling advisers that it was “the end of his presidency.” The president told aides that Mueller had conflicts of interest and should have to step aside. His aides told Trump the asserted conflicts were meritless. Following media reports that Mueller’s team was investigating whether the president had obstructed justice, Trump called then-White House counsel Don McGahn at home and directed him to have Mueller removed. McGahn refused.

____

FURTHER EFFORTS TO CURTAIL THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’s INVESTIGATION

Trump instructed former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to have Sessions publicly announce that, notwithstanding his recusal from the Russia investigation, the investigation was “very unfair” to the president, the president had done nothing wrong, and Sessions planned to meet with Mueller to limit him to “investigating election meddling for future elections.”

___

EFFORTS TO PREVENT PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE

In summer of 2017, Trump learned that the news media planned to report on the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between senior campaign officials and Russians offering derogatory information about Hillary Clinton. The president directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails setting up the meeting. Before the emails became public, the president also edited a press statement for Donald Trump Jr. by deleting a line that acknowledged that the meeting was “with an individual who (Trump Jr.) was told might have information helpful to the campaign.”

___

ADDITIONAL EFFORTS TO HAVE SESSIONS TAKE CONTROL OF INVESTIGATION

At several points in between July 2017 and December 2017, Trump tried to get Sessions to declare that he was no longer recused from the Russia investigation and would assert control over it. The report says there’s evidence that one purpose of asking Sessions to step in was so that the attorney general would restrict the investigation’s scope.

___

TRUMP ORDERS WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL TO DENY THAT PRESIDENT TRIED TO FIRE MUELLER

In an Oval Office meeting in February 2018, Trump told McGahn to “correct” a New York Times story that reported Trump had earlier instructed McGahn to fire Mueller. Trump also asked why McGahn had told Mueller’s investigators about the directive to remove Mueller. McGahn told Trump he had to tell the investigators the truth.

___

TRUMP’S ACTIONS TOWARD, FLYNN, MANAFORT AND OTHER POSSIBLE WITNESSES

Mueller looked at whether Trump’s sympathetic messages to Flynn, former campaign manager Paul Manafort and others were intended to limit their cooperation with Mueller’s investigation. When Flynn began cooperating with prosecutors, Trump passed word through his lawyer that he still had warm feeling for Flynn and asked for a “heads up” if Flynn knew of information implicating Trump. Trump praised Manafort during and after his criminal convictions, and refused to rule out a pardon for his former campaign chairman.

___

TRUMP ACTIONS TOWARD MICHAEL COHEN

Mueller noted that Trump’s conduct toward Cohen, a former Trump Organization executive, changed from praise to castigation after Cohen began cooperating with prosecutors. The evidence could “support an inference that the president used inducements in the form of positive messages in an effort to get Cohen not to cooperate, and then turned to attacks and intimidation to deter” cooperation and undermine Cohen’s credibility, Mueller wrote.

Waiting some kind of rebuttal in 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 --........,

Barr and Rosenstein already have, they determined no OoJ.
 
Barr and Rosenstein already have, they determined no OoJ.

Incorrect. The best they said was 'can't see either way,' and even that contradicted the Mueller report. They don't get the last word in any case.
 
Hannity is a BIG target because of his fantastic ratings!! :mrgreen:

As May winds down to a close, Fox News Channel is finishing the month as the most-watched network across all of basic cable for the 35th straight month. Simultaneously, CNN is continuing a downward turn, finishing eighth in total day viewers, averaging only 552,000. 'Hannity' averaged 3.1 million viewers, finishing as the most-watched program on cable news, while CNN's most-watched show, 'Cuomo Prime Time,' finished 25th overall.
m

And this a- proves that Fox is fair and balanced, or b- that their commentators, esp. their evening ones, give their conservative viewers, aka old white guys, what they want to hear.
 
What obstruction?

Do you mean the Democrats of the FBI and DOJ obstructing justice such as altering transcripts in an official document - the exact definition in the law of "obstruction of justice" - or do you mean lying to the FISA court?

The reference is to the 10 or so instances of obstruction mentioned in the Mueller report. True, the FBI has been a bastion of liberalism for decades.
 
Incorrect. The best they said was 'can't see either way,' and even that contradicted the Mueller report. They don't get the last word in any case.

Actually you would be incorrect, Barr said "Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense"

The AG has had the last word, the House Majority has yet to start impeachment proceedings.
 
Hannity is a BIG target because of his fantastic ratings!! :mrgreen:

As May winds down to a close, Fox News Channel is finishing the month as the most-watched network across all of basic cable for the 35th straight month. Simultaneously, CNN is continuing a downward turn, finishing eighth in total day viewers, averaging only 552,000. 'Hannity' averaged 3.1 million viewers, finishing as the most-watched program on cable news, while CNN's most-watched show, 'Cuomo Prime Time,' finished 25th overall.

Three point one million of these?
Not surprising!

teabaggerscooterpatriot.jpg
 
Barr and Rosenstein already have, they determined no OoJ.

Both spineless Trump toadies. They're dismissed. They never said 'no obstruction of justice'. William Barr in his 4 page synopsis said he 'found no evidence of collusion'.

Robert Mueller complained to the Trump administration that the attorney general’s summary of his report on the Trump-Russia investigation did not correctly represent the “context, nature, and substance” of his probe, it has been revealed. In two separate letters to William Barr, the special counsel said he was concerned the public could be confused by the four-page summary the attorney general sent to senior members of Congress.

“The summary letter the department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,”
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom