• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Leftist Journalists Harass Little Girl

AmNat

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
7,644
Reaction score
2,056
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The newest victim of the media-generated outrage mob is a 14 year old girl who posts political satire videos on YouTube:

https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1128074193264947205

It goes without saying that it's despicable for an adult to write a hit piece on a child. Though I'm sure that liberals here will find a way to defend it.
 
Let's look at the article one journalist, not plural wrote:

YouTube’s Newest Far-Right, Foul-Mouthed, Red-Pilling Star Is A 14-Year-Old Girl

"Soph" has nearly a million followers on the giant video platform. The site's executives only have themselves to blame.

What does a 14-year-old girl dressed in a chador have to say on YouTube to amass more than 800,000 followers?

How about this: “I’ve become a devout follower of the Prophet Muhammad. Suffice to say, I’ve been having a **** ton of fun. Of course, I get raped by my 40-year-old husband every so often and I have to worship a black cube to indirectly please an ancient Canaanite god — but at least I get to go to San Fran and stone the **** out of some gays, and the cops can’t do anything about it because California is a crypto-caliphate.”



Or how about, simply, “Kill yourself, faggot.”

Yes, if you want a vision of the future YouTube is midwifing, imagine a cherubic white girl mocking Islamic dress while lecturing her hundreds of thousands of followers about Muslim “rape gangs,” social justice “homos,” and the evils wrought by George Soros — under the thin guise of edgy internet comedy, forever.

Actually, don’t imagine it. Watch it. It’s already here.

The video is called “Be Not Afraid,” and it may be the clearest manifestation yet of the culture the executives of Alphabet’s video monster are delivering to millions of kids around the world, now via children incubated in that selfsame culture. To understand just how bad things have gotten on the platform, you need to see it for yourself.

Users — and more importantly to YouTube, advertisers — have over the past year started to hold the platform accountable for enabling the exploitation of children and exposing them to disturbing content. But this video reveals an entirely different way the platform is harming kids: by letting them express extreme views in front of the entire world. This is what indoctrination looks like when it’s reflected back by the indoctrinated.

A 20-minute, unbroken, and hyperarticulate tirade ostensibly about ignoring criticism online, “Be Not Afraid” stars a high school freshman from the Bay Area who goes by the name Soph on YouTube. (She edits as well as scores the videos, which she says are comedic.) Through videos like these, she’s become a rising star — with more than 800,000 followers — in the universe of conspiracy theorists, racists, and demagogues that owes its big bang to YouTube.

The video platform for years has incentivized such content through algorithms favoring sensational videos, and, as recent reporting has revealed, has deliberately ignored toxic content as a growth strategy.

Soph’s scripts, which she says she writes with a collaborator, are familiar: a mix of hatred toward Muslims, anti-black racism, Byzantine fearmongering about pedophilia, tissue-thin incel evolutionary psychology, and reflexive misanthropy that could have been copied and pasted from a thousand different 4chan posts. Of course, it’s all presented in the terminally ironic style popularized by boundary-pushing comedy groups like the influential Million Dollar Extreme and adopted of late by white supremacist mass shooters in Christchurch and San Diego.

(Soph is even more explicitly hateful on Discord, the gaming chat app, where she recently admitted to writing under the username “lutenant faggot” that she hoped for “A Hitler for Muslims” to “gas them all.”)

By now, we’re used to this stuff coming from grown men — some of whom have even used the platform as a launching pad for political aspirations. But Soph is a child. Despite the vitriol of her words and her confidence in delivering them, she’s still just a 14-year-old kid. And hearing this language lisped through braces, with the odd word mispronounced as if read but never before said, is clarifying.

Now is this a hit piece on a little girl or rightfully questioning children's material?

Would you allow your 14 year old daughter to hope for a hitler for Muslims?
 
Last edited:
The newest victim of the media-generated outrage mob is a 14 year old girl who posts political satire videos on YouTube:

Nick Monroe on Twitter: "BuzzFeed attacks children now. @sewernugget I'm sorry that the vultures have come to attack you https://t.co/WJY9g1S9II… https://t.co/BeksIZMdhn"

It goes without saying that it's despicable for an adult to write a hit piece on a child. Though I'm sure that liberals here will find a way to defend it.

If she spouts hate, is she immune because she is 14?
 
This video, this response article, this conversation... all of it illustrates with perfection how dead wrong political correctness got Islam.

It is satire but it was also intended to be controversial, insulting, and appeal to a response that odds are no one will like.

We never learn.

And BTW, being 14 does not shield someone from response when the clear intention was to provoke one.
 
Let's look at the article one journalist, not plural wrote about

YouTube’s Newest Far-Right, Foul-Mouthed, Red-Pilling Star Is A 14-Year-Old Girl



Now is this a hit piece on a little girl or rightfully questioning children's material?

Would you allow your 14 year old daughter to hope for a hitler for Muslims?

So as we contemplate how the 1st Amendment is going to be applied across new forms of communication, what is the bigger problem? A 14 year old feeling their oats and learning what get her attention, or the parents who perhaps are paying any attention to how she is getting it?

Frankly, kids don't seem to be demonstrating they have the maturity to own and operate unfiltered internet devices, so perhaps restriction is an avenue that could be explored on a grand scale. Kind of like possession of alcohol.
 
After reading the article I find the girl utterly revolting and worthy of a hit piece. I hate Buzzfeed for being biased garbage but I stand by their article in this case.
 
So as we contemplate how the 1st Amendment is going to be applied across new forms of communication, what is the bigger problem? A 14 year old feeling their oats and learning what get her attention, or the parents who perhaps are paying any attention to how she is getting it?

Frankly, kids don't seem to be demonstrating they have the maturity to own and operate unfiltered internet devices, so perhaps restriction is an avenue that could be explored on a grand scale. Kind of like possession of alcohol.

In my opinion, the parents. Parents who have minor children should monitor and restrict access to the internet as a whole but you can't make a parent be a parent. I am in the minor, judging by all the kids I know who have their noses in their phones unrestricted all day long but I agree maybe we should explore more restrictions.
 
The newest victim of the media-generated outrage mob is a 14 year old girl who posts political satire videos on YouTube:

Nick Monroe on Twitter: "BuzzFeed attacks children now. @sewernugget I'm sorry that the vultures have come to attack you https://t.co/WJY9g1S9II… https://t.co/BeksIZMdhn"

It goes without saying that it's despicable for an adult to write a hit piece on a child. Though I'm sure that liberals here will find a way to defend it.

Oh, look who is defending a racist little Hitler loving hate monger.

Imagine that.
 
In my opinion, the parents. Parents who have minor children should monitor and restrict access to the internet as a whole but you can't make a parent be a parent. I am in the minor, judging by all the kids I know who have their noses in their phones unrestricted all day long but I agree maybe we should explore more restrictions.

Yes, I agree, you can't make a parent, parent. And unfortunately, the trend is to make it easier for parents not to parent.

I'm very hesitant to endorse anything that smack of censorship, etc., but age restriction is already codified in many things.

It seems to me if parents aren't parenting, and kids are ending up harming themselves or others as a result of what they are exposing themselves to, age restrictions on internet access and devices that can be used for that purpose might be wise to be considered.
 
She joined YouTube back in 2015 and has been posting videos for a few years.

Obviously her parents never got the memo that they need to monitor their kids activities on the internet Perhaps they just don't care.

It's incredibly sad that there are almost a million people that follow her. What a messed up world we live in. So many imbeciles.
 
So as we contemplate how the 1st Amendment is going to be applied across new forms of communication, what is the bigger problem? A 14 year old feeling their oats and learning what get her attention, or the parents who perhaps are paying any attention to how she is getting it?

Frankly, kids don't seem to be demonstrating they have the maturity to own and operate unfiltered internet devices, so perhaps restriction is an avenue that could be explored on a grand scale. Kind of like possession of alcohol.

Her view isn't really an different from many of the adult supporters of Trump.
 
It goes without saying that it's despicable for an adult to write a hit piece on a child. Though I'm sure that liberals here will find a way to defend it.

It seems I'm a prophet:

Now is this a hit piece on a little girl or rightfully questioning children's material?

If she spouts hate, is she immune because she is 14?

And BTW, being 14 does not shield someone from response when the clear intention was to provoke one.

After reading the article I find the girl utterly revolting and worthy of a hit piece. I hate Buzzfeed for being biased garbage but I stand by their article in this case.
 
New Rule: 14 Year Olds Who Spew Hate Speech But Complain About Being Vilified for It Should Be Vilified
 
Now is this a hit piece on a little girl or rightfully questioning children's material?

Journos support child drag queens and abortion. Any pretense they make to caring about the welfare of children is purely a manipulation tactic and should be met with contempt.

What this is about the petty and vain nature of journalists. Joseph Bernstein spent six years in college (probably racking up a ton of debt in the process), so that he could write propaganda for BuzzFeed. The thought that some 14 year old could bypass all of that and already make an income on YouTube (and while voicing the wrong opinions at that), is deeply upsetting to someone like him.

It's similar to why journos hate PewDiePie, though their conduct is much more reprehensible in this case.
 
Journos support child drag queens and abortion. Any pretense they make to caring about the welfare of children is purely a manipulation tactic and should be met with contempt.

What this is about the petty and vain nature of journalists. Joseph Bernstein spent six years in college (probably racking up a ton of debt in the process), so that he could write propaganda for BuzzFeed. The thought that some 14 year old could bypass all of that and already make an income on YouTube (and while voicing the wrong opinions at that), is deeply upsetting to someone like him.

It's similar to why journos hate PewDiePie, though their conduct is much more reprehensible in this case.

Please any pretense you are trying to make about caring about a supposed hit piece on a child is purely BS.

If you did "care about children" you'd actually be concerned that a 14 year old girl is making this kind of content without any visible parent supervision. I have a young daughter and you best believe she would never be allowed to do that.

EDIT to add if this was some crazy vocal lefty teenage girl talking in vulgar terms about say gun control I find it hard to believe you wouldn't line up to do your own hit piece.
 
Lol evidently I'm a liberal now.

Supporting adults writing hit pieces on teenagers isn’t typical of conservatives, which is why I assumed you were a liberal.

If you are any sort of right-winger, you should ask yourself why your first reaction to a left-wing hit piece on a teenage girl was to support the hit piece. The MSM won’t look down on you any less for capitulating.

Please any pretense you are trying to make about caring about a supposed hit piece on a child is purely BS.

If you did "care about children" you'd actually be concerned that a 14 year old girl is making this kind of content without any visible parent supervision. I have a young daughter and you best believe she would never be allowed to do that.

EDIT to add if this was some crazy vocal lefty teenage girl talking in vulgar terms about say gun control I find it hard to believe you wouldn't line up to do your own hit piece.

I’m immune to this sort of concern telling. Most millennial conservatives are.

Expressing opinions that BuzzFeed considers unacceptable is not a form of self-harm. What is harmful is trying to destroy someone’s career. And pretending to do it because you just care so much . . . it brings Matthew 23:14 to mind.

Her parents are apparently liberals, but I’d assume they’re proud to have a daughter who is not only insightful and self-confident, but has also managed to jump start a career at such a young age. Most good parents would be.

*cough* Emma Gonzalez...

I’m not aware of anyone calling for her to lose her job.

Why is it that liberals can’t seem to understand the difference between mere criticism and calling for someone’s source of income to be taken away?
 
I assumed that a few old-school feminists would show up to condemn an adult man harassing a teenage girl, but I guess they’ve all sold out to the intersectional crowd.
 
Supporting adults writing hit pieces on teenagers isn’t typical of conservatives, which is why I assumed you were a liberal.

If you are any sort of right-winger, you should ask yourself why your first reaction to a left-wing hit piece on a teenage girl was to support the hit piece. The MSM won’t look down on you any less for capitulating.

I take each issue as it's own and try not to apply a party line belief system across the board. I actually read the article and some of the girl's video. She's despicable.
 
She jumps into the political ring and starts mouthing hateful rhetoric, she is fair game. Politics ain't beanbag.
 
I assumed that a few old-school feminists would show up to condemn an adult man harassing a teenage girl, but I guess they’ve all sold out to the intersectional crowd.

A teenage girl who hopes for millions of innocent people to get murdered loses the right to hide behind the “just a teenager” card.
 
Back
Top Bottom