• We will be taking the forum down for maintenance at [3:30 PM CDT] - in 25 minutes. We should be down less than 1 hour.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hypothetically speaking...

Slyfox696 said:
:lamo :lamo :lamo

My guess is you have no idea how badly you just insulted yourself.
Click to expand...

Did Barr force Mueller to end his investigation pre-maturely?
 
Slyfox696 said:
So much so there's not a single piece of evidence to support it.

A "witch hunt" which exposed hundreds of contacts between his campaign and Russians and which sent multiple members of his campaign to jail for lying about their interactions with Russians.

I don't think the term "witch hunt" means what you think it does...

Uh, nah, no attorney worth their salt actually believes Barr's spin on that. You cannot obstruct a legal investigation just because you claim you are innocent. That's not how the real world works.

Yes, the Deep State which hates Trump so much they allowed him to become President.

Seriously, how stupid does one have to be in order to believe this conspiracy nonsense?
Noting how poorly he worded his comeback, to the point it insulted himself, is not a "projection".

I think you need to work on getting better translation software...
Click to expand...

Sure there is.

September 2016 :
U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin
U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin


October 2016 :
A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump
A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump – Mother Jones


October 2016:
Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia
Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia - The New York Times


Former top FBI lawyer James Baker under criminal investigation for media leaks
Former top FBI lawyer James Baker under criminal investigation for media leaks


How many legitimate FBI investigations are leaked to the press just a month before a Presidential election ?
 
AmIsraelHai said:
After two years of investigating the administration, why did Robert Mueller defer the question of obstruction to Attorney General William Barr? Did Barr have information outside of the Mueller report to help with his decision? Was Barr biased?
Click to expand...

Why did Mueller not do his job ? He couldn't prove obstruction but needed to keep the obstruction false narrative alive.

Fairly obvious
 
AmIsraelHai said:
What will happen if Barr does not share enough information from the Mueller report?
Click to expand...
How long has it been out? Have you heard any non-political expert complain about something important being redacted. You do know that Mueller and his team participated in the redaction process, right? Some Congress people were given access to a less redacted version - hear anything from them? Nope.
 
AmIsraelHai said:
What do you think of William Barr’s summary of the Mueller report?
Click to expand...
It was fine for the purpose it was intended for. People took far more out of it than he intended.
 
Lutherf said:
...what will be the results for the US mass media if it turns out that Trump was right and the FBI did spy on his campaign? What will be the result if it turns out that Trump and his campaign staff really didn't coordinate with Russians to manipulate the 2016 election? What will people say about the press if, by some chance, Trump really didn't commit any criminal acts of obstruction of justice?

This is all pure speculation and, undoubtedly, crazy talk but would people still respect the media if it turns out that rather that Trump conspiring with Russians it was Democrats conspiring with Russians?
Click to expand...

If they were spying it was to find out if Collusion was occurring between the Russians and those within the trump campaign. They had all the cause they needed since they knew the Russians were interfering in the elections and the person it was helping was trump. This will go nowhere, but the Repubs do love investigating the other guys, thier track record is nothing to brag about.
 
AmIsraelHai said:
Any expectation for the future?
Click to expand...
Yeah, the pendulum is going to swing back the other way and a lot of Obama aides and LWers in high placed in the government are going to be unhappy without jobs and possible with jail time.
 
Bullseye said:
Yeah, the pendulum is going to swing back the other way and a lot of Obama aides and LWers in high placed in the government are going to be unhappy without jobs and possible with jail time.
Click to expand...

Why do you think the government are going to be unhappy without jobs and possible with jail time?
 
AmIsraelHai said:
Why do you think the government are going to be unhappy without jobs and possible with jail time?
Click to expand...
You understand the word "aides" as in people. Those are the ones losing jobs and maybe getting jail time.
 
Mr Person said:
Anyway, since all these conservatives suddenly discovered a love of defendants in criminal cases, I'm sure they will join in denouncing things like:

- the regular use of extremely biased snitches aka "informants" to obtain search warrants, wiretap authorizations, etc.
- the regular use of extremely biased snitches aka "informants" for testimony against a defendant a trial.
- the regular use of DUI checkpoints to investigate crime (aka just about anything the officer claims to have noticed within a few minutes) without suspicion.
- the regular patting down and illegally searching of people, most commonly poor minorities, which is then retroactively justified by claims that the person was acting "suspiciously" therefore giving the officer reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts that he had committed, was committing or was about to commit a crime.

I could go on for quite a while. But why should I? Clearly these pro-Trump conservatives really do care about a suspect's rights and are against all of this stuff, even if the target is an illegal alien drug dealing pimp.

Most certainly these Trumpists are not saying what they're saying because and only because Trump was the target.
Click to expand...

I don't care for your continued beating of a long dead horse.
 
Mr Person said:
Read the actual report, then read Barr's summary.

:shrug:
Click to expand...

If a proposition and an emoji are all you have to add. Then could you possibly do more to delegitimize yourself in this?
 
AmIsraelHai said:
After two years of investigating the administration, why did Robert Mueller defer the question of obstruction to Attorney General William Barr?
Click to expand...
He didn't. You made that up. Mueller's report clearly left the question open to Congress, due to existing DOJ guidelines against indicting the President.
AmIsraelHai said:
Did Barr force Mueller to end his investigation pre-maturely?
Click to expand...
...are you a bot? Because I cannot think of any other explanation for why you'd quote that particular post and ask that particular question.
Fenton said:
Sure there is.
Click to expand...
Legitimate investigation practices are not a witch hunt.

Sir or madam, I have already exposed you for the propagandist you are, how you keep pushing the same words and phrases in your intent to push your propaganda. Why would you now waste my time with your propaganda?
 
Slyfox696 said:
He didn't. You made that up. Mueller's report clearly left the question open to Congress, due to existing DOJ guidelines against indicting the President.
...are you a bot? Because I cannot think of any other explanation for why you'd quote that particular post and ask that particular question.
Legitimate investigation practices are not a witch hunt.

Sir or madam, I have already exposed you for the propagandist you are, how you keep pushing the same words and phrases in your intent to push your propaganda. Why would you now waste my time with your propaganda?
Click to expand...

Why are you afraid to answer?
 
Slyfox696 said:
He didn't. You made that up. Mueller's report clearly left the question open to Congress, due to existing DOJ guidelines against indicting the President.
...are you a bot? Because I cannot think of any other explanation for why you'd quote that particular post and ask that particular question.
Legitimate investigation practices are not a witch hunt.

Sir or madam, I have already exposed you for the propagandist you are, how you keep pushing the same words and phrases in your intent to push your propaganda. Why would you now waste my time with your propaganda?
Click to expand...

Here's a little "propaganda" for ya there, you sly person you.

What is, or ever has been "legitimate" about this witch-hunt? ESPECIALLY NOW???

Pelosi has called William Barr a liar. So have several other pansies.
It turns out that Nunez had every bit as much "evidence" about the way this whole witch-hunt got started, as the Democrats have ever had concerning collusion or obstruction. MORE in fact as it also turns out that the FISA warrants were actually gained by lies of omission. Had the FISA judge known Hillary-Billary had been paying for that Dossier, and that the meat of it was all unverified bull-chips, none of the warrants to spy on an American citizen would have been granted.

Then of course there's those 2 lovers at the FBI and their foreplay messages to each other. That alone is as "big" as Donald telling the Russians to release Hillary's emails. Shortly followed by how Stzroke set-up Flynn.

Ya...Democrats have allot to fear right now.
They know this and are ramping up the nonsense-engine.
IMO...they should just shut the hell up and quit poking the hornet's nest...known as the Attorney General.
 
AmIsraelHai said:
Why are you afraid to answer?
Click to expand...
I did answer and asked a question. Why did you not answer my question?
Buzz62 said:
What is, or ever has been "legitimate" about this witch-hunt?
Click to expand...
Legitimate investigations are not witch hunts. Even Trump's handpicked FBI Director Chris Wray said it was not a witch hunt and the investigation was legitimate.

Pelosi has called William Barr a liar.
Click to expand...
An accurate statement.

It turns out that Nunez had every bit as much "evidence" about the way this whole witch-hunt got started, as the Democrats have ever had concerning collusion or obstruction.
Click to expand...
:lamo :lamo :lamo

Okay. Considering Nunes "evidence" has been dismissed by his own investigation and Mueller noted copious amounts of collusion, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you are posting obvious falsehoods.

MORE in fact as it also turns out that the FISA warrants were actually gained by lies of omission. Had the FISA judge known Hillary-Billary had been paying for that Dossier
Click to expand...
The judge did. The FBI included that in their application. This has already been settled.

If you're just going to make laughably false statements based on blatant lies, then I'm not wasting any more time with you.
 
Slyfox696 said:
I did answer and asked a question. Why did you not answer my question?
Legitimate investigations are not witch hunts. Even Trump's handpicked FBI Director Chris Wray said it was not a witch hunt and the investigation was legitimate.

An accurate statement.

:lamo :lamo :lamo

Okay. Considering Nunes "evidence" has been dismissed by his own investigation and Mueller noted copious amounts of collusion, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you are posting obvious falsehoods.

The judge did. The FBI included that in their application. This has already been settled.

If you're just going to make laughably false statements based on blatant lies, then I'm not wasting any more time with you.
Click to expand...

I didn't see the question, what is it?
 
Slyfox696 said:
I did answer and asked a question. Why did you not answer my question?
Legitimate investigations are not witch hunts. Even Trump's handpicked FBI Director Chris Wray said it was not a witch hunt and the investigation was legitimate.

An accurate statement.

:lamo :lamo :lamo

Okay. Considering Nunes "evidence" has been dismissed by his own investigation and Mueller noted copious amounts of collusion, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you are posting obvious falsehoods.

The judge did. The FBI included that in their application. This has already been settled.

If you're just going to make laughably false statements based on blatant lies, then I'm not wasting any more time with you.
Click to expand...

No...I want you to hang around long enough to see how dead wrong you are.
Remember...The US Attorney General is actively investigating "spying" on American citizens.

The Meuller investigation turned up bubkus. Too bad, so sad.

I'm gonna enjoy every minute of this. So you just stay right there.
 
Legitimate warrants are "spying" if the target is Trump, but god-fearingly valid if the target is an alleged illegal alien drug dealer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom