• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fake News get new Marching orders from Pelosi.

Don't count out Pelosi. She is resourceful and vindictive enough to pull a few strings, and I have no doubt that she has a few juicy bits on some people.
 
Lovebug said:
Don't count out Pelosi.
Click to expand...



Madame Speaker has just been quoted as saying these chilling words: "We cannot accept a second term for Donald Trump."
 
wellwisher said:
This thread is about bias in the news. I was watching Tucker Carlson on FOX news, last night. I rarely watch the news but Trump was going to speak, so I tuned in early. Carlson showed a clip of Nancy Pelosi on stage, giving new marching orders to the propaganda wing of the Democrat party; CNN and MSNBC. She said forget about collusion and start talking about Health Care.

Within a short time, the entire day's programing of CNN sounded like a large informercial for health care, with not a peep about Mueller and collusion even though this was nonstop for two years. Carlson then showed clips of everyone reading essentially the same script, with some freedom to improvise.

CNN lost 50% of its audience share that day. Fake news was a disappointment and the replacement discussion was very boring as quick talking used car salesmen and saleswomen oversold the nonsense like a campaign add. Even with a loss in market share, and a good news day, nothing but the marching orders were served. Bias is a real thing and the Democrat do have a propaganda wing. I would not recommend Democrat, who wish to maintain a fantasy of CNN being unbiased news, watch the link below. For others, this is eye opening and is worse that I ever imagined.

Tucker Carlson: CNN is really a super PAC, colluding with the Democratic Party on the news you hear | Fox News
Click to expand...

pressistheenemy.jpg
 
Mach said:
You saw stuff on Tucker's non-news, hyper-partisan show, then came here to report it? Irony.

You know that's not News right? You know he's a partisan hack right? Whats' with the furrowed brow, so faux-angry.

If Trump talks about X, that is also reported on CNN and MSNBC. You do understand how reality works? They talk about XYZ, it's reported on.
Pelosi talks about focus for the Democratic party, it's reported. You understand why, surely?

Fake news is from Fox's shows like Hannity and Tucker, and others like Alex Jones, Beck, Rush, etc. It's partisan propoganda, often angry and hyped-up.
To fight back, right wing media often just accuses the other side of the same. So if Fox's crap shows do it 99% of the time, and other networks do it 10% of the time, they don't see nuance, they simply say "both are fake news".

In effect, this immunizes FOx's viewership from every thinking Fox is fake news. Because hte other side is fake = what I watch isn't fake, makes sense in some percentage of the brains in our population.
Click to expand...

You wrote an awful lot of words to provide zero content. One giant logic fallacy and nothing more. Why bother wasting your time with such transparent cheerleading?
 
TheGoverness said:
I love the totally impartial Tucker Carlson.
Click to expand...

No one said Carlson was impartial. Whether he is or isn't isn't germane to the subject of the thread.
 
Deuce said:
This thread is cute when Fox News literally coordinates messaging with the GOP.
Click to expand...

We aren't talking about Fox News here. If you want, start a thread about that. As such, your deflection has been noted and dismissed.
 
Mr Person said:
Tucker Carlson, Trump, and then Fox?

You've got no standing to speak of "fake news". And if you actually cared, you'd be focusing how right-wing giants coordinate well over 200 local channels to all say the same thing, with the same phrases, and the same inflection/tone.
Click to expand...

Ah...so you accept what was pointed out then, since you don't want to address the actual topic of the OP and prefer deflection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom