• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News' latest hire: Donna Brazile

Slyfox696 said:
What can I say, when I see a blatant lack of honesty and/or self-awareness in people, it makes me laugh.

Irrelevant to the fact you have. :shrug:

Who said I did? I am just pointing out your real positions do not match what you stated. :shrug:

:lamo

See my first sentence in this post.
Click to expand...

How presumptuous of you to try to tell me what my "real" positions are. I'm neither unaware of myself nor dishonest, but now I'm the one who's amused. Mean-spirited and low remarks just expose you for what you are. :lol:
 
nota bene said:
How presumptuous of you to try to tell me what my "real" positions are.
Click to expand...
It is not presumptuous, it is based on your posting. That's what those of us who live and work in the real world call "evidence". You have provided copious amounts of evidence over a long period of time to show what you truly support.

I'm neither unaware of myself nor dishonest
Click to expand...
On two (and I believe three, but two for sure) separate occasions, you have essentially claimed you are incapable of clicking a link which would prove you wrong.

If that is not dishonesty, it is utter stupidity and I do not believe THAT of you.

but now I'm the one who's amused.
Click to expand...
Clearly. :roll:
Mean-spirited and low remarks just expose you for what you are. :lol:
Click to expand...
Unaccepting of dishonesty? Yeah, I'm okay if people think that of me. At the end of the day, the poster I see in you is based on how you have represented yourself. And when you try to dismiss one poster's argument as partisan while ignoring the constant barrage of thinly veiled racist threads of the threadstarter by saying you won't click on them (when I provide a list of links for you), that is not honest in my opinion. When you support OBVIOUS propaganda from a poster who vomits it on a regular basis, even though the post in question is an OBVIOUS lie to anyone who simply clicks the Twitter link I provide, then that is not honest in my opinion.

At the end of the day, it is clear to me your positions are dependably partisan ("far-left ideologues" were the words YOU used) and the idea you won't support Brazile because she gave questions to Clinton is laughable. You won't support her because she's not like you. And I have never seen you post ANYTHING to suggest it is not true.
 
justabubba said:
because she has demonstrated that she has the kind of ethics faux news would appreciate
Click to expand...

I love watching Dumbocrats eat their own.
Yet another reason I switched from Libbie to Conservative.
 
Slyfox696 said:
It is not presumptuous, it is based on your posting. That's what those of us who live and work in the real world call "evidence". You have provided copious amounts of evidence over a long period of time to show what you truly support.

On two (and I believe three, but two for sure) separate occasions, you have essentially claimed you are incapable of clicking a link which would prove you wrong.

If that is not dishonesty, it is utter stupidity and I do not believe THAT of you.

Clearly. :roll:
Unaccepting of dishonesty? Yeah, I'm okay if people think that of me. At the end of the day, the poster I see in you is based on how you have represented yourself. And when you try to dismiss one poster's argument as partisan while ignoring the constant barrage of thinly veiled racist threads of the threadstarter by saying you won't click on them (when I provide a list of links for you), that is not honest in my opinion. When you support OBVIOUS propaganda from a poster who vomits it on a regular basis, even though the post in question is an OBVIOUS lie to anyone who simply clicks the Twitter link I provide, then that is not honest in my opinion.

At the end of the day, it is clear to me your positions are dependably partisan ("far-left ideologues" were the words YOU used) and the idea you won't support Brazile because she gave questions to Clinton is laughable. You won't support her because she's not like you. And I have never seen you post ANYTHING to suggest it is not true.
Click to expand...

Oh, but Brazile is like me, and in more than one way. Thanks for the expenditure of time in this lengthy personal attack. I had no idea you were so personally invested in me. Of course, now you've made me worried--kind of scary that you're both so interested and so wrong.

:lamo
 
nota bene said:
Oh, but Brazile is like me, and in more than one way.
Click to expand...
But not in the way it pertains to this thread, as I said. Why are you deliberately misrepresenting what I'm saying?

Thanks for the expenditure of time in this lengthy personal attack.
Click to expand...
Personal attack? No, it is simply noting why I do not believe you in this thread. The fact you won't even acknowledge your past acts where you deliberately refused to click links is quite telling.

I had no idea you were so personally invested in me.
Click to expand...
It's an Internet discussion forum. You do understand how these work right?

Of course, now you've made me worried
Click to expand...
:lamo :lamo :lamo

Okay.

--kind of scary that you're both so interested and so wrong.
Click to expand...
Again, where do you get the idea I'm interested? Because I acutely remember posters who have repeatedly shown themselves as unwilling to engage in debate honestly?

It's really simple. On multiple occasions you have deliberately chosen to ignore facts. This is not even in dispute from you. Each time your refusal was clearly made in the interest of pursuing an obviously partisan agenda. Whether you admit it or not will not change the facts.
 
Last edited:
Lol, Bill O'Rapist pays out millions in lawsuits from multiple women on sexual assault claims. Tucker Carlson gets caught making women out to be animals. Sean Hannity is deeply involved with Donald Trump's lawyer.


But only now has FOX News lost its fair and balanced act because a person who cheated on a debate joins them.

Lol, conservatives are strange people.

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
 
DH Kirkwood said:
I'm not interested in 'way, way better'. That's an insanely low bar.

So, why did you mention Trump's criticism of the media while addressing my own . . . are you under the impression that our criticism is the same? Do you feel that the fact that Donald Trump critisizes the media, invalidates all criticism of the media?

I'm actually a little confused. You've got AOC as an avatar and you're stated lean is progressive, yet you're defending someone who fed Hillary Clinton debate questions because Fox News is so much worse?

And no, not all media has a corporate slant. It's true of mainstream media in general, but not all media. There's TYT, which I consider to have an actual left-leaning slant.
Click to expand...

Update: I found TYTTV on PlutoTV (though my PS4) today. I'm still not a big fan of Cenk, but I'll pop in on it a little more often now.
 
I am delighted that Ms. Brazile is joining FOX NEWS.

I have occasionally seen her speaking on cable news.

She has always conducted herself like a lady and avoided all shouting and screaming.

Maybe her civil behavior stems from the fact that she is a mature person, not one of those know-it-all whippersnappers who get all the attention.
 
No one can say Fox is not fair and balanced ever again.
Heck, on the F&B scale from 1 to 10, they rate a ten after hiring a known Democrat hack, cheater and liar.
 
trixare4kids said:
No one can say Fox is not fair and balanced ever again.
Heck, on the F&B scale from 1 to 10, they rate a ten after hiring a known Democrat hack, cheater and liar.
Click to expand...

She'll blend right in with the Fox cast, except she's quite a bit smarter than the typical Fox talking potato head.
 
Rogue Valley said:
She'll blend right in with the Fox cast, except she's quite a bit smarter than the typical Fox talking potato head.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't know, I don't watch partisans banter on cable tv.
I leave that to leftists such as yourself, who continue to make Fox number one in the ratings. ;)
 
trixare4kids said:
No one can say Fox is not fair and balanced ever again. Heck, on the F&B scale from 1 to 10, they rate a ten after hiring a known Democrat hack, cheater and liar.
Click to expand...

FOX news is neither fair nor balanced.
It's primarily a ****-show of right wing propaganda, an iconic example of corruption in the United States.
 
trixare4kids said:
I wouldn't know, I don't watch partisans banter on cable tv.
Click to expand...

You "wouldn't know", but you blather on about it being "fair and balanced"?
Why do you post such phony trash?
 
Mach said:
You "wouldn't know", but you blather on about it being "fair and balanced"?
Why do you post such phony trash?
Click to expand...

I know that's what they advertise.
Got anymore personal attacks?
 
madasheck said:
Call me more than a little shocked. I hope she doesn't take any crap from them (and punches Hannity and Pirro when she gets the first chance).

Fox News hires Donna Brazile as political contributor
Click to expand...

"Brazile says she knows she’ll be criticized by progressive friends for signing with Fox, but that she believes it’s important to talk with people you disagree with."

LOL, she knows she needs a job is what she knows.

Too cool. She will be forced to play stupid to the wingnut talking heads.

Fox does this all the time. They bring in weak Dems and they play along as one of the wingnut talking heads apperas to out reason them.

It's an old routine at Fox that they stared with the hannity and colmes show.
 
trixare4kids said:
No one can say Fox is not fair and balanced ever again.
Heck, on the F&B scale from 1 to 10, they rate a ten after hiring a known Democrat hack, cheater and liar.
Click to expand...

Hiring one Democrat with all the crazy R's on that channel -- Hannity, Carlson, Pirro -- doesn't balance the scales.
 
noonereal said:
"Brazile says she knows she’ll be criticized by progressive friends for signing with Fox, but that she believes it’s important to talk with people you disagree with."

LOL, she knows she needs a job is what she knows.

Too cool. She will be forced to play stupid to the wingnut talking heads.

Fox does this all the time. They bring in weak Dems and they play along as one of the wingnut talking heads apperas to out reason them.

It's an old routine at Fox that they stared with the hannity and colmes show.
Click to expand...
[emphasis added by bubba]

like using juan williams as an ignorant black pinata?
 
Old people bragging about cable ratings remind me of record labels who still argue that physical sales are a better business model than streaming services.

But only cause they're pretty boring discussions to have with the person who thinks they know the ins and outs of media related companies.

You win at the least competitive form of media broadcasting; then you come on the internet and you cry that Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Wikipedia, and everywhere else that isn't getting their news from the Rabid Republican Blog is biased against you.

I am sure the left can live with that.



--------

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
 
Wait.... this is the fake black woman who got caught with some sort of benefits fraud after the whole fake black thing blew up?
 
madasheck said:
Call me more than a little shocked. I hope she doesn't take any crap from them (and punches Hannity and Pirro when she gets the first chance).

Fox News hires Donna Brazile as political contributor
Click to expand...


From the article:
Brazile had been let go from a similar role at CNN in 2016 after it was revealed that she had shared material about topics that would be addressed at a Democratic forum with Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

At Fox, Brazile will not have anything to do with any debates or town halls — if they ever happen. That’s from a Fox News executive who spoke on condition of anonymity Monday because the person was not authorized to speak about contract details.
​


  1. Red: I doubt Fox has any compunction about that.
  2. Blue: It appears, right now, Fox won't either. LOL
  3. Pink: That's priceless! LOL The exec's not allowed to share the contract details, yet s/he just shared one of them. What a "tool."
"I'm not allowed to tell anyone, so you didn't hear this from me, but let me tell you...."​

Why do folks find it so hard to keep their friggin' mouths shut, yet they're mum when they ought not be?

One one hand, people lack self-control, yet, the stuff that is right and fitting to share, they won't discuss.​


  • [*=1]Private sector --> Firms and people should keep mum about everything unless/until instructed otherwise, yet folks blab.
    [*=1]Public sector --> There is precious little the public hasn't a right to know about the proceedings of the governments they fund, yet it's at times like pulling teeth to get public officials to disclose the "truth, whole truth and nothing but the truth."
Talk about an effed-up "system."​
 
trixare4kids said:
No one can say Fox is not fair and balanced ever again.
Heck, on the F&B scale from 1 to 10, they rate a ten after hiring a known Democrat hack, cheater and liar.
Click to expand...

She'll go along nicely with all the other liars and cheaters on Fox -- Hannity, Carlson, Pirro (assuming she still has a job), etc.
 
Common Sense 1 said:
Oh this is going to work out really well.....


Donna Brazile, fired from CNN for sharing debate question, joins Fox News
Donna Brazile, fired from CNN for sharing debate question, joins Fox News


Donna Brazile out at CNN amid leaks to Clinton campaign
Donna Brazile out at CNN amid leaks to Clinton campaign
October 31, 2016:

Donna Brazile, the acting chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, resigned from her role as a CNN contributor earlier this month.

Her departure was announced Monday amid fresh revelations that she sent questions to Hillary Clinton's campaign in advance of a CNN debate and a CNN-TV One town hall.

In a statement, CNN said it was "completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor."
Click to expand...

I no longer have a lot of respect for Ms Brazil because of her leaking questions to Clinton prior to the debate. Totally unacceptable. I watched her reaction to finding out Trump was not going to be found guilty by Mueller of anything and it was easy to tell she was most upset. She's just another partisan democrat who can't get passed the talking points.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom