• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Twitter Censors Republicans 22:1 vs Leftists

Integrityrespec said:
You don't get much regulation of Facebook or Twitter or the like because they are run by liberals who tend to support the left politicians and they give lots of money. They also punish right leaning persons much more than liberals.
Click to expand...

So who forces you to use Facebook or Twitter?
 
Praxas said:
So who forces you to use Facebook or Twitter?
Click to expand...

No one forces you to speak, so why does anyone need free speech rights?
 
joko104 said:
No one forces you to speak, so why does anyone need free speech rights?
Click to expand...

Twitter and a Facebook are private companies. So does Sean hannitys show have to give a platform to liberals? According to you it does if you aren’t a hypocrite.
 
Praxas said:
Twitter and a Facebook are private companies. So does Sean hannitys show have to give a platform to liberals? According to you it does if you aren’t a hypocrite.
Click to expand...

Sean Hannity and FOX are liable for actionable slanderous statements. Twitter and Facebook are exempt. Why?


In addition, FOX does not have control of 85% of all of cable news. Google/Twitter/Facebook do for the Internet, which is now more than 50% of all information flow and over 50% of all retail sales. If you explore past anti-trust suits, rarely did companies found to be monopolies even approach that percentage.

To make your point, you have to show 1.) why Google, Facebook and Twitter have exemption from libel and slander lawsuits and 2.) why they are exempt from anti-trust laws.

It is curious how some many Democrats who curse the mega super rich and demand endless regulations against corporations, then turn around insisting companies can do whatever they want IF it is the richest people on earth who support Democrats and liberalism.
 
joko104 said:
Sean Hannity and FOX are liable for actionable slanderous statements. Twitter and Facebook are exempt. Why?


In addition, FOX does not have control of 85% of all of cable news. Google/Twitter/Facebook do for the Internet, which is now more than 50% of all information flow and over 50% of all retail sales. If you explore past anti-trust suits, rarely did companies found to be monopolies even approach that percentage.

To make your point, you have to show 1.) why Google, Facebook and Twitter have exemption from libel and slander lawsuits and 2.) why they are exempt from anti-trust laws.

It is curious how some many Democrats who curse the mega super rich and demand endless regulations against corporations, then turn around insisting companies can do whatever they want IF it is the richest people on earth who support Democrats and liberalism.
Click to expand...

Where is Facebook and Twitter themselves slandering anyone. Posters may but then so do the posters on Sean hannitys site. And twitter , google and Facebook does not control anything but it’s own content on their sites. How do they control 85% of he internet? You pulling numbers out of dark places again?
 
Praxas said:
Where is Facebook and Twitter themselves slandering anyone. Posters may but then so do the posters on Sean hannitys site. And twitter , google and Facebook does not control anything but it’s own content on their sites. How do they control 85% of he internet? You pulling numbers out of dark places again?
Click to expand...

All I know is that if the title of the tread was correct, I would not have to black at least one Right Wing Nut per day from appearing on my Twitter page.

Wing Nuts cry too much.
 
calamity said:
All I know is that if the title of the tread was correct, I would not have to black at least one Right Wing Nut per day from appearing on my Twitter page.

Wing Nuts cry too much.
Click to expand...

I know right wing nutjobs have been trying to find anything to whine and cry about. This is their latest failed attempt. They think there is a GRAND CONSPIRACY against conservatives on the internet even though the likes of Rush, Hannity, and even Infowars is still there.

What I really have to laugh about is conservatives say that people can open ANY business they want to with HARD WORK, DEDICATION and INTELLIGENCE. Yet none of them start their own Facebook, Twitter, or Google search engine type company.
 
So Republicans are 22 times more racist and bigoted than Democrats...

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
calamity said:
Well, Right Wingers are racist, homophobes. Everyone knows that. Bravo, Twitter.
Click to expand...

OrphanSlug said:
This has nothing to do with the media, Twitter is social media and they have grown tired of racist, homophobic, misogynistic nonsense being spewed by the far right.
Click to expand...

Yes, by all means. Ignore it when the left does it.

This double standard is so damn pathetic.
 
Oborosen said:
Yes, by all means. Ignore it when the left does it.

This double standard is so damn pathetic.
Click to expand...

Awwww...everyone is out to get the poor racist conservatives. Whaaa!
 
calamity said:
Well, Right Wingers are racist, homophobes. Everyone knows that. Bravo, Twitter.
Click to expand...

Integrityrespec said:
You don't get much regulation of Facebook or Twitter or the like because they are run by liberals who tend to support the left politicians and they give lots of money. They also punish right leaning persons much more than liberals.
Click to expand...

Like when it was revealed that facebook was actively punishing/censoring conservative pages and when it was found out, they played like it was an accident... yeah. I call BS on that.
 
calamity said:
Well, Right Wingers are racist, homophobes. Everyone knows that. Bravo, Twitter.
Click to expand...

calamity said:
Awwww...everyone is out to get the poor racist conservatives. Whaaa!
Click to expand...

No, their out just to get conservatives. Your opinion that their racist, is probably the most ignorant thing I've seen from you in a while. Seeing as more than just one racial demographic in the US is conservative.

But yes, keep ignoring the left. It's probably one of the only things you're good at.
 
Twitter Censors Republicans 22:1 vs Leftists
Click to expand...

Well, then I'd say that Republicans tweet what Twitter deems censurable remarks in a 22:1 ratio in comparison to Democrats.

That is what it is. Twitter doesn't, before allowing members to join, discern whether they're malingering Republican evangelical crusaders for sub-mediocrity.
 
Oborosen said:
Yes, by all means. Ignore it when the left does it.

This double standard is so damn pathetic.
Click to expand...

What the hell are you even talking about, when did I complain about something from the left censored by Twitter?
 
calamity said:
Well, Right Wingers are racist, homophobes. Everyone knows that. Bravo, Twitter.
Click to expand...

Twitter is obviously biased. There is likely a good explanation and that explanation is almost certainly influenced by money. What then drives Twitter owners or managers? Greed.
 
americanwoman said:
Do you want the government to regulate social media so the private companies don't show bias like this?
Click to expand...

This type of scientific study is the type that can inform Leftists, and expose bigoted Leftists like Calamity.

calamity said:
Well, Right Wingers are racist, homophobes. Everyone knows that. Bravo, Twitter.
Click to expand...


The CEO of Twitter went to Congress, raised his right hand and swore to tell the truth. He lied. Last time they claimed someone did that, they had SWAT teams and helicopters swarm his house.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Lied Under Oath To Congress

Do you believe this type of bias, from a provider who claims to be unbiased is good for society?
###

See what happens when Leftists get to control Speech?

And we have morons who cheer this on. The are the same type of people who are defending the seditious behavior McCabe revealed yesterday.

A Seriously dark, vile and UnAmerican part of the country.

You see, I believe in Free Speech. I think it is MEGA scum-like behavior to silence those who have a different view or you dislike. It’s the epitome of intolerance. Closed-mindedness. Smallness. It’s not good for society.

Leftists though... given the chance, resort to shutting down or out their opposition... whenever the opportunity arises. It’s a hallmark of their ideology.

Just look at the Leftists here... nary a word in the defense of free speech, and how wrong it is to shut down an opponent. How society suffers when voices are snuffed. And it’s usually the weakest of voices... those for which all they have is their singular voice.

Yep... Twitter has the power... and Leftists hoards cheer them on... Twitter, like Leftists throughout history... abuse said power.

It’s sick and sad.
 
Last edited:
Cont’d.

Do you condone this type of intolerant behavior? Do YOU?
 
zimmer said:
I wonder where the Feminist who was banned for stating the obvious, that mutilated men are not women, would land in this?
Click to expand...

You know what? I don't care. **** 'em. Weren't they the ones laughing at "Liberal tears"...? Ha. Ha. Ha.
 
rocket88 said:
Oh great another "conservatives are victins" thread. With a chaser of "kick the transgender because Zimmer can't keep on topic."

Anything else you want to add? Abortion? Antifa?
Click to expand...

It is on topic. I can’t help it if you are not informed. That’s what I’m here for... as my tag line states... “educating the ignorant”.

Meghan Murphy, the founder of the blog Feminist Current, was locked out of her account last year when the company asked her to delete a tweet that said, “Men aren’t women,” CNET reported, citing the lawsuit. A second tweet said, “How are transwomen not men?” according to the suit.

She had violated the social media site’s rules against hateful conduct when she referenced a transgender woman as “him,”...

Twitter sued by feminist blogger blocked over '''men aren'''t women''' tweet: lawsuit | Fox News
Click to expand...

Are mutilated men... women? Are they? Your answer will reveal whether you believe in science or not.

Do you think she should be banned for stating the obvious? Than men are not women, regardless of the mutilation that took place to try to give them the outward appearance?
 
Last edited:
Nobody finds this unusual. Social media, news media, hollywood, all are pretty liberal supporting and moving more to the left every day. There is a failure by our government to regulate these industries and fairly and evenly protect all americans.
 
zimmer said:
It is on topic. I can’t help it if you are not informed. That’s what I’m here for... as my tag line states... “educating the ignorant”.



Are mutilated men... women? Are they? Your answer will reveal whether you believe in science or not.

Do you think she should be banned for stating the obvious? Than men are not women, regardless of the mutilation that took place to try to give them the outward appearance?
Click to expand...

It's not on topic.

I believe that everyone should have the freedom to live as they please. Too bad you don't believe in freedom. Science has relatively little to say about where gender identity or sexual orientation come from. You don't believe in science, so....
 
zimmer said:
I wonder where the Feminist who was banned for stating the obvious, that mutilated men are not women, would land in this?
Click to expand...

Oh the right whinge. "It's all so unfair!"
The quote you posted begins with "I began my analysis by compiling a list of every prominent individual or political party known to have been banned from Twitter..."
and ends with "Follow him on Twitter @RichardHanania".
 
rocket88 said:
It's not on topic.

I believe that everyone should have the freedom to live as they please. Too bad you don't believe in freedom. Science has relatively little to say about where gender identity or sexual orientation come from. You don't believe in science, so....
Click to expand...

It was central to the topic.

She was banned by twitter. I posed the question where she would fall in the political spectrum.

You have given the answer of a coward.

Is someone born as a man... a woman?

Science says no, regardless of the mutilation or camouflage involved.

You agree? Or are you a science denier?

And is it wrong for the feminist to state scientific facts?

Is it OK for her to be banned from twitter for stating clear scientific facts?
 
Grand Mal said:
Oh the right whinge. "It's all so unfair!"
The quote you posted begins with "I began my analysis by compiling a list of every prominent individual or political party known to have been banned from Twitter..."
and ends with "Follow him on Twitter @RichardHanania".
Click to expand...

You don’t believe in free speech?

That intolerant leftists can ban opponents to the tune of 22:1

Ok... we know where you stand. With intolerance.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Nobody finds this unusual. Social media, news media, hollywood, all are pretty liberal supporting and moving more to the left every day. There is a failure by our government to regulate these industries and fairly and evenly protect all americans.
Click to expand...

So are you wanting to have government regulation to make Sean Hannity's show and website fair for liberals than?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom