• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Real Smirking Maga Hat Kid story gets out

dirtpoorchris

dirtpoorchris

King of Videos
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
11,655
Reaction score
3,612
Location
WA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
This video sums it up. Must watch it for context.

 
dirtpoorchris said:
This video sums it up. Must watch it for context.

Click to expand...


Lesson: it's socially acceptable for a bunch of grown men to menace underage white minors with stereotypes about them being 'school shooters' and 'pedophiles', but it's not OK for an underage white boy to smile in public. Got it leftists! I hope they enjoy the coming repercussions, as whites realize that the DNC hates even children based upon the color of their skin.
 
The kid was an embarrassment to Catholic School kids and Catholics everywhere.

So says this Catholic ...
 
Chomsky said:
The kid was an embarrassment to Catholic School kids and Catholics everywhere.

So says this Catholic ...
Click to expand...

From some stuff I've seen that catholic school is an embarrassment to catholic schools.
 
azgreg said:
From some stuff I've seen that catholic school is an embarrassment to catholic schools.
Click to expand...
I can't believe one of the teachers told the kids to chant the school sports song, in response to the Hebrew Israelite guys' taunting. What the hell was he or she thinking? Sing the school fight song? Geezus Krist on a cracker ...
 
azgreg said:
From some stuff I've seen that catholic school is an embarrassment to catholic schools.
Click to expand...

And even it thinks they were an embarrassment.




Those kids were punks and the tomahawk **** was racist. Nobody fails to know that mocking a Native chant while doing that to the chanter is. That's the only reason to do it: to say "haha, stupid Indian!" And nothing anyone else did somehow makes that behavior above criticism. It really is no different than defending the kids if they'd called the "black Israelites" n------. Two wrongs, yadda yadda.

But no, things are so polarized that 40% of America just has to make the kids completely innocent and the Native dude(s) (or the "black Israelites" or the "black muslims"), or "the liberal media" the real and only aggressors. Yet again, something that should have been a simple matter of agreeing that yes, that thing right there was *****y and then moving on has to turn into a giant argument, because so many people just have to defend defend defend.

It really is quite depressing. These patterns started well before Trump decided to play politician and will keep going long after.
 
Last edited:
Chomsky said:
The kid was an embarrassment to Catholic School kids and Catholics everywhere.

So says this Catholic ...
Click to expand...

My god it's 4pm on Monday when this story was already shown to be a fraud and you still want to dump on these kids who did nothing wrong?

These kids did ZERO wrong, what were they supposed to do?
 
Mr Person said:
And even it thinks they were an embarrassment.




Those kids were punks and the tomahawk **** was racist. Nobody fails to know that mocking a Native chant while doing that to the chanter is. That's the only reason to do it: to say "haha, stupid Indian!" And nothing anyone else did somehow makes that behavior above criticism. It really is no different than defending the kids if they'd called the "black Israelites" n------. Two wrongs, yadda yadda.

But no, things are so polarized that 40% of America just has to make the kids completely innocent and the Native dude(s) (or the "black Israelites" or the "black muslims"), or "the liberal media" the real and only aggressors. Yet again, something that should have been a simple matter of agreeing that yes, that thing right there was *****y and then moving on has to turn into a giant argument, because so many people just have to defend defend defend.

It really is quite depressing. These patterns started well before Trump decided to play politician and will keep going long after.
Click to expand...

Yeah shut it, this guy confronted them first, after they were already being shouted at by black supremacists, they were going along with this guy's song and drum, and usually people who act like this elder are fakes anyway, and in return you are justifying death threats, doxxing, and the whole like.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
My god it's 4pm on Monday when this story was already shown to be a fraud and you still want to dump on these kids who did nothing wrong?

These kids did ZERO wrong, what were they supposed to do?
Click to expand...
The kid was a jerk. Even with the new video evidence brought forth. His behaviour is not appropriate for Catholic School. Now you can take that, or leave it, as you wish.
 
Chomsky said:
The kid was a jerk. Even with the new video evidence brought forth. His behaviour is not appropriate for Catholic School. Now you can take that, or leave it, as you wish.
Click to expand...

There was nothing inappropriate in his behavior or their behavior. I'm not going to take it or leave it. This is coordinated attack on both these kids and on my faith. I will not stand for it. A CNN reporter advocated for physical violence against one of the teens, the former head of the DNC called for Catholic schools to be shut down as "hate factories" an actress head them doxxed, they are the subject of violent twitter mobs, and the only reason is because an indian lied to CNN after some kids responded to a group of adult men calling them slurs and telling a black student they were going to harvest his organs. Their only response to try to drown out this hateful rhetoric with a school cheer, and the only reason CNN went with this story was to avoid talking about the march for life.
 
Mr Person said:
And even it thinks they were an embarrassment.




Those kids were punks and the tomahawk **** was racist. Nobody fails to know that mocking a Native chant while doing that to the chanter is. That's the only reason to do it: to say "haha, stupid Indian!" And nothing anyone else did somehow makes that behavior above criticism. It really is no different than defending the kids if they'd called the "black Israelites" n------. Two wrongs, yadda yadda.

But no, things are so polarized that 40% of America just has to make the kids completely innocent and the Native dude(s) (or the "black Israelites" or the "black muslims"), or "the liberal media" the real and only aggressors. Yet again, something that should have been a simple matter of agreeing that yes, that thing right there was *****y and then moving on has to turn into a giant argument, because so many people just have to defend defend defend.

It really is quite depressing. These patterns started well before Trump decided to play politician and will keep going long after.
Click to expand...

EMNofSeattle said:
Yeah shut it, this guy confronted them first, after they were already being shouted at by black supremacists, they were going along with this guy's song and drum, and usually people who act like this elder are fakes anyway, and in return you are justifying death threats, doxxing, and the whole like.
Click to expand...

When I rock out to the music, especially Native American music, I always point, laugh, elbow a group of buddies, and make tomahawk chop signs at them. Because that's a how people rock out to Native American music in a not at all asshole racist fashion. And when I do that to rock out to their music, I'm perfectly on base and innocent -unimpeacheably so - because if I do that someone might anonymously claim on the internet that those i consider political enemies might doxx and kill me.

/sardonics off
/sarcrasm off





No. I watched the videos. No other wrongs, alleged or right, make this particular wrong defensible. This particular wrong is defended, but that was predictable. As were the people who would be defending it.

The kids were wrong.

Want to talk about someone else being in the wrong? Then don't do it in a way that dishonestly suggests it somehow excuses the kids' behavior.
 
Mr Person said:
When I rock out to the music, especially Native American music, I always point, laugh, elbow a group of buddies, and make tomahawk chop signs at them. Because that's a how people rock out to Native American music in a not at all asshole racist fashion. And when I do that to rock out to their music, I'm perfectly on base and innocent -unimpeacheably so - because if I do that someone might anonymously claim on the internet that those i consider political enemies might doxx and kill me.

/sardonics off
/sarcrasm off





No. I watched the videos. No other wrongs, alleged or right, make this particular wrong defensible. This particular wrong is defended, but that was predictable. As were the people who would be defending it.

The kids were wrong.

Want to talk about someone else being in the wrong? Then don't do it in a way that dishonestly suggests it somehow excuses the kids' behavior.
Click to expand...

So, I'm going to put you down for yes, commit physical violence, kick them out of school, which will be shut down by the government as per the former chair of your political party. pathetic.
 
Chomsky said:
I can't believe one of the teachers told the kids to chant the school sports song, in response to the Hebrew Israelite guys' taunting. What the hell was he or she thinking? Sing the school fight song? Geezus Krist on a cracker ...
Click to expand...

Perhaps it is what they knew. Curious now though...how does their fight song go?
 
dirtpoorchris said:
This video sums it up. Must watch it for context.
Click to expand...

Some dude talking isn't context for what in fact happened. Videos from different angles, preferably longer ones, are. And those don't add up to the defense you lot seem to think it is.





Those kids were wrong, just it would be wrong for a white person to call a black person a "n-----" because they felt (wrongly OR RIGHTLY) that the black person did something wrong to them first. Nobody fails to know what mimicking a native chant while doing a "tomahawk chop" at a Native who is chanting.

And nobody is scared of an old man beating a drum unless they are a character in a movie and the old man is Clint Eastwood.





Remember: two wrongs don't make a right. They may make a lack of standing, but context is important. That is, things that actually are part of context are important.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Yeah shut it, this guy confronted them first, after they were already being shouted at by black supremacists, they were going along with this guy's song and drum, and usually people who act like this elder are fakes anyway, and in return you are justifying death threats, doxxing, and the whole like.
Click to expand...

Mr Person said:
When I rock out to the music, especially Native American music, I always point, laugh, elbow a group of buddies, and make tomahawk chop signs at them. Because that's a how people rock out to Native American music in a not at all asshole racist fashion. And when I do that to rock out to their music, I'm perfectly on base and innocent -unimpeacheably so - because if I do that someone might anonymously claim on the internet that those i consider political enemies might doxx and kill me.

/sardonics off
/sarcrasm off





No. I watched the videos. No other wrongs, alleged or right, make this particular wrong defensible. This particular wrong is defended, but that was predictable. As were the people who would be defending it.

The kids were wrong.

Want to talk about someone else being in the wrong? Then don't do it in a way that dishonestly suggests it somehow excuses the kids' behavior.
Click to expand...

EMNofSeattle said:
So, I'm going to put you down for yes, commit physical violence, kick them out of school, which will be shut down by the government as per the former chair of your political party. pathetic.
Click to expand...

Now why would you conclude that announcing in advance that you will lie about what I said on the same page I said it and in reply to the quote in which I said it would *get* me?




Your position is partisan garbage. No matter what wrongs the media and "black Israelites" (or "black muslims") might have done, the kid's behavior and the rest of the kids' behavior was wrong, and some of them went with a directly racist bent.

I really don't understand why some people go to such lengths to attack anything that looks like a suggestion racism might have been involved on anyone's part in anything. I know that I am 0% likely to make a "tomahawk chop" at a Native while mocking his chant, or at all. So I'm not worried about some scenario where I think I've somehow innocently done it but got meanly called a racist. Why do you think some people might find it so important to argue that somehow, a racial attack is a reasonable response to anything?





Let's go more extreme:

IS it ok for a white man to call a black man a "n-----" if the black man has just punched the white man?

If so, why? Precisely why?
 
Mr Person said:
Some dude talking isn't context for what in fact happened. Videos from different angles, preferably longer ones, are. And those don't add up to the defense you lot seem to think it is.





Those kids were wrong, just it would be wrong for a white person to call a black person a "n-----" because they felt (wrongly OR RIGHTLY) that the black person did something wrong to them first. Nobody fails to know what mimicking a native chant while doing a "tomahawk chop" at a Native who is chanting.

And nobody is scared of an old man beating a drum unless they are a character in a movie and the old man is Clint Eastwood.





Remember: two wrongs don't make a right. They may make a lack of standing, but context is important. That is, things that actually are part of context are important.
Click to expand...

Liberals on sunday: Punch the racists! Their School's a hate factory! White Patriarchy! twitter mobs and death threats!

On Monday after being discredited: "Two wrongs don't make a right"

Skippy, save it, you people lied. End story. You don't get to moralize after your team lies.

Trump said it best, the fake news is the enemy of the people, they purposefully set up a fake story to distract attention from the march for life and these students were acceptable casaulties.

No, moralizing bro, your team wrong.
 
The kid is a hero.He showed great restraint.If that was me I would have knocked the Indians head off his shoulders.Its obvious the Indian was a paid thug.
 
Mr Person said:
Now why would you conclude that announcing in advance that you will lie about what I said on the same page I said it and in reply to the quote in which I said it would *get* me?




Your position is partisan garbage. No matter what wrongs the media and "black Israelites" (or "black muslims") might have done, the kid's behavior and the rest of the kids' behavior was wrong, and some of them went with a directly racist bent.

I really don't understand why some people go to such lengths to attack anything that looks like a suggestion racism might have been involved on anyone's part in anything. I know that I am 0% likely to make a "tomahawk chop" at a Native while mocking his chant, or at all. So I'm not worried about some scenario where I think I've somehow innocently done it but got meanly called a racist. Why do you think some people might find it so important to argue that somehow, a racial attack is a reasonable response to anything?





Let's go more extreme:

IS it ok for a white man to call a black man a "n-----" if the black man has just punched the white man?

If so, why? Precisely why?
Click to expand...


I would not jump to racism if shouting the word was the response to an unprovoked physical attack.

And the only people who would are race baiters who would desire to obfuscate an unprovoked attack in this scenario.

The partisan garbage buddy was what happened to these poor teenagers.

You know exactly why

Because the left uses the word racism to discredit anything other then their own political agenda. Nothing in this video provides any evidence whatsoever these students believe they are racially superior to American indians.
 
Last edited:
EMNofSeattle said:
My god it's 4pm on Monday when this story was already shown to be a fraud and you still want to dump on these kids who did nothing wrong?

These kids did ZERO wrong, what were they supposed to do?
Click to expand...

wearing MAGA hats seems to justify all sorts of lies
 
dirtpoorchris said:
This video sums it up. Must watch it for context.

Click to expand...


Oh calm down. The kid appeared to act like a prick. I blame both for not engaging in conversation about what was going on.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Liberals on sunday: Punch the racists! Their School's a hate factory! White Patriarchy! twitter mobs and death threats!
On Monday after being discredited: "Two wrongs don't make a right"
Skippy, save it, you people lied. End story. You don't get to moralize after your team lies.
Trump said it best, the fake news is the enemy of the people, they purposefully set up a fake story to distract attention from the march for life and these students were acceptable casaulties.
No, moralizing bro, your team wrong.
Click to expand...



edv2zt5yntb21.png
 
TurtleDude said:
wearing MAGA hats seems to justify all sorts of lies
Click to expand...

I'm more shocked that National Review initially wrong a story condemning these kids, seriously did we learn nothing from Kavanugh?

The left will simply lie. If the leftist media puts up a story of a white christian male villain then it's a lie. period. These people are liars until proven true in my book and it's time to push back, there needs to be consequences for the media. There needs to be consequences for people who lie to the media to get them to spread those lies. we need to start opening up libel laws so suing people for slander is super easy.
 
azgreg said:
From some stuff I've seen that catholic school is an embarrassment to catholic schools.
Click to expand...

Seems they've crawled under a rock after posting that they weren't happy with what they saw.:shrug:
 
Airyaman said:
Perhaps it is what they knew. Curious now though...how does their fight song go?
Click to expand...
No idea.

But by the videos, it would seem to have a component where the tomahawk action is done when a native-American comes in close proximity! ;)

Edit:

Aha. It seems they took the fight song down from their website, but I found this on YouTube (same school colours):


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom