• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FOX News - The Mueller NOISE

He mentioned that the bar for impeachment is much lower. You must not have read his post.

What does impeachment have to do with anything,

My quote:
When you have facts of a Trump indictment let me know. Otherwise your opinions are worthless.
 
Your correct, the noise is getting louder:

Woodward's after looking for two years, says no collusion found:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...rump_and_russia_i_searched_for_two_years.html

NPR can't find collusion and asks "Where's the Collusion?"
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/25/641659007/the-russia-investigations-where-s-the-collusion


Looks like some on the left are finally waking up from their revenge fantasy...and some are still dreaming.

Your NPR article is dated from August. Considering that new revelations are coming out weekly, this is ancient. You take a Trump quote as the gist of that NPR article:lol: From your own link:

There were contacts, both personal and electronic, between Trump campaign aides and Russians throughout 2016. There was the Trump Tower meeting at which intermediaries conveyed a political tip to Donald Trump Jr. from the Russian government. There was the increase in cyberattacks — on the same day that Trump asked, "Russia, if you're listening," — for it to find Hillary Clinton's deleted emails. And so on.
...
What's become clear is how eagerly, in the final weeks before Election Day 2016, Cohen and Trump sought to silence the women who could have embarrassed Trump.
 
What does impeachment have to do with anything,

My quote:
When you have facts of a Trump indictment let me know. Otherwise your opinions are worthless.

When Congress starts getting the FULL PICTURE, they will be forced to act.
 
You people keep saying...have been saying for a long time now..."the investigation isn't over yet".
Uhhh...yes...I think it's about over now. Trump's new AG is no fan of this BS and is not a big fan of Mueller's either.
There has been nothing but a bunch of unrelated charges and convictions, but no proof of the wholly grail of Trump/Russia "collusion".
In fact, now that its obvious even to you hopeful people, the battle-cry has shifted to...his payments to 2 whores in order to keep them quiet.
Really people...have you no shame or scruples at all? Is your hatred of the POTUS so deep, that you'd stoop to trying to prove the unprovable, just for 1 more kick at the can? Mueller's tactics, along with the dossier and the FISA warrants are gonna be a huge embarrassment and could easily spell the doom of your super hero Mueller.

There are 17 separate investigations against Trump. Sorry that the revelation that he is probably guilty of conspiracy to commit election fraud is currently at the top of the list, but it is. There will be other revelations.

https://www.wired.com/story/mueller-investigation-trump-russia-complete-guide/

As to the conspiracy and obstruction of justice issues that Mueller is working, I appreciate the frustration you must feel being in the dark. But that fact that you do not the case does not mean there isn't case. The conspiracy has been pretty well laid out in the two big indictments of February and July 2018. We are just waiting to see which American's get enjoined to that case. The obstruction of justice has been carried out in plain sight. It will not be asserted if there isn't anything esle, but its pretty hard to believe, at the this point, that there isn't anything else.

Trump has a long reputation of corruption from his real estate days in New York. He surrounded himself with corrupt individuals indicating that he is very comfortable operating in and around corruption. You would have to be pretty naive, at this point, to think that Trump is going to be exonerated in Mueller's findings. If you have doubts, just look at how Trump overreacts to each piece of news that comes out. The man has GUILTY stamped on his forehead.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/opinion/trump-administration-corruption-conflicts.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/25/opinion/sunday/corruption-donald-trump.html
https://newrepublic.com/article/143...ses-dirty-money-international-crime-syndicate
https://qz.com/1428493/trump-organizations-four-steps-for-misleading-real-estate-investors/
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/21/trumps-business-of-corruption

What Mueller doesn't get done, the House Oversight and House Intelligence committees will.
 
Last edited:
Wrong as usual Calamity.

(chuckle)

Mueller's already lit the fuse and Trump is going crazy.

Merry Christmas from Payless, Merrry Christmasaas

:lamo
 
(chuckle)

Mueller's already lit the fuse and Trump is going crazy.

Merry Christmas from Payless, Merrry Christmasaas
Is that what you think? :lamo
That's nice.
 
Dear Mr. Occam:

After 2 years of work by Mr. Mueller, with no proof or evidence of Russian collusion found, what do you suppose that means? That since he did not find facts or evidence showing Russian collusion, there is none?

:mrgreen:
 
Dear Mr. Occam:

After 2 years of work by Mr. Mueller, with no proof or evidence of Russian collusion found, what do you suppose that means? That since he did not find facts or evidence showing Russian collusion, there is none?

:mrgreen:

So you asked a question which required some contemplation, let me try one.... What do you think the life expectancy of the Mueller investigation is from the time Mueller asks the AAG to indict Donald Trump, Jr? I don't think particularly long. It seems that card has to be played at just the right time, like when he work is pretty much done.

If you ever played rummy, you would not look at the cards laid down as the threat; it would be the cards in your opponents hand that were being held close to the vest that you should worry about.

The Mueller investigation has been one of the most efficient of all such investigations. In just two years, Mueller's team has indicated or convicted 35 persons and 3 companies with over 100 charges. The chart below diagrams the success over time of various major federal investigations

Special investigations over Time.jpg
 
So you asked a question which required some contemplation, let me try one.... What do you think the life expectancy of the Mueller investigation is from the time Mueller asks the AAG to indict Donald Trump, Jr? I don't think particularly long. It seems that card has to be played at just the right time, like when he work is pretty much done.

If you ever played rummy, you would not look at the cards laid down as the threat; it would be the cards in your opponents hand that were being held close to the vest that you should worry about.

The Mueller investigation has been one of the most efficient of all such investigations. In just two years, Mueller's team has indicated or convicted 35 persons and 3 companies with over 100 charges. The chart below diagrams the success over time of various major federal investigations

View attachment 67247070

The trouble is that Mueller himself is very much a compromised individual, just as the FBI is a compromised organization and has been pretty much since its inception. That means that what Mueller has provided is nothing but political theater. His indictments are testimony to that.

The reason he could not prove Russian collusion is because there was no Russian collusion. An international businessman such as Trump likely would have tried to open properties in Russia. That would be an ordinary event, and explain any visits or deals with Russians.

The claim circulated by the Dems that somehow or other Russia stole HRC's election is preposterous. That fantasy is believed only by hyperpartisan democrats or others with a strong aversion to Trump. I'm no fan of his at all, but blaming the Russians for the loss is childish.
 
Back
Top Bottom