uptower
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2018
- Messages
- 20,036
- Reaction score
- 17,108
- Location
- Behind you - run!
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Re: ABC News puts their bias on display in interview with Ivanka
Sounds more plausible. When interviewing a lying snake you really do have to ask more than once. Damn right Ivanka's answer was not satisfactory because she claimed she did not break white house protocol. That was a lie.
I suppose when Trump surrogates and possibly the president himself get hauled before congress, for much more serious allegations, asking the same question twice will be considered 'bias'.
Imagine that conversation:
(Warning, fantasy projection ahead)
Booker: Did you instruct your son to attend the Trump tower meeting?
DJT: Well it's a beautiful tower, who wouldn't want a meeting there, first class tower, if you look at what they did with it.
Booker: Yes Mr President, but did you send your son or any other staff to that meeting?
DJT: There were meetings, everyone has meetings. If you look at what people are saying it's meetings, meetings everywhere. So many beautiful meetings.
Booker: I'll ask one more time sir, did you order anyone to attend that meeting?
DJT: And just so we're clear there was no meeting. Not that I knew of and if I'd known about it it wouldn't have been a meeting anyway. That's why they call me 'No Meeting Donald', I don't know if you knew that, but that's what they're calling me these days...
Booker: Mr President one more time, the meeting?
DJT: Get me out of here...
Or maybe the reporter knew she was lying and then proceeded to get a different answer out of her, which she ended up doing.
Sounds more plausible. When interviewing a lying snake you really do have to ask more than once. Damn right Ivanka's answer was not satisfactory because she claimed she did not break white house protocol. That was a lie.
I suppose when Trump surrogates and possibly the president himself get hauled before congress, for much more serious allegations, asking the same question twice will be considered 'bias'.
Imagine that conversation:
(Warning, fantasy projection ahead)
Booker: Did you instruct your son to attend the Trump tower meeting?
DJT: Well it's a beautiful tower, who wouldn't want a meeting there, first class tower, if you look at what they did with it.
Booker: Yes Mr President, but did you send your son or any other staff to that meeting?
DJT: There were meetings, everyone has meetings. If you look at what people are saying it's meetings, meetings everywhere. So many beautiful meetings.
Booker: I'll ask one more time sir, did you order anyone to attend that meeting?
DJT: And just so we're clear there was no meeting. Not that I knew of and if I'd known about it it wouldn't have been a meeting anyway. That's why they call me 'No Meeting Donald', I don't know if you knew that, but that's what they're calling me these days...
Booker: Mr President one more time, the meeting?
DJT: Get me out of here...