- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
- Messages
- 2,693
- Reaction score
- 1,350
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I don't listen to much talk radio, but every once in awhile, while driving from A to B, I would listen to tidbits of our local, AM morning talk shows, with leftist hosts, followed by small portions of right wing afternoon shows while headed from B to A. Occasionally I'd be lucky enough to catch one of Rush Limbaugh's montages of mainstream news media 'taglines'. Despite being on air at the same time, on different stations/channels, there would be dozens of examples of 'journalists' repeating the same exact statements, filled with the same adjectives and the same over-the-top praise(for democrats) or harsh criticisms/insults(for republicans).
One that comes to mind, was when Obama decided to order a military "surge" in Afghanistan, choosing David Petraeus as overall leader. Just a few years earlier, Barack Obama was completely against Bush's Iraq surge(as were most big democrats), and those same dems were against Petraeus as its leader. Hillary stood in the Senate claiming that Petraeus was a bad choice and could NOT be trusted. They hammered Bush over both decisions b4 the surge was to start. Of course, the media carried their anti-surge, anti-Petraeus water.
But when Obama decided to have his own surge, ironically choosing David Petraeus as leader, the media exploded with praise of the highest order for Obama AND Petraeus! Rush's montage covered those media responses. Literally dozens of times, many anchors and 'journalists' said the exact same thing, "this is a brilliant decision by Barack Obama, and David Petraeus is a perfect choice for leader of the operation".....
But this montage is of mainstream media hyper-exaggeration and 'sky is falling' predictions, starting in early 2017 and continuing forward from there: https://youtu.be/FJkhUAdHqbQ
One that comes to mind, was when Obama decided to order a military "surge" in Afghanistan, choosing David Petraeus as overall leader. Just a few years earlier, Barack Obama was completely against Bush's Iraq surge(as were most big democrats), and those same dems were against Petraeus as its leader. Hillary stood in the Senate claiming that Petraeus was a bad choice and could NOT be trusted. They hammered Bush over both decisions b4 the surge was to start. Of course, the media carried their anti-surge, anti-Petraeus water.
But when Obama decided to have his own surge, ironically choosing David Petraeus as leader, the media exploded with praise of the highest order for Obama AND Petraeus! Rush's montage covered those media responses. Literally dozens of times, many anchors and 'journalists' said the exact same thing, "this is a brilliant decision by Barack Obama, and David Petraeus is a perfect choice for leader of the operation".....
But this montage is of mainstream media hyper-exaggeration and 'sky is falling' predictions, starting in early 2017 and continuing forward from there: https://youtu.be/FJkhUAdHqbQ