• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Boston Globe BADLY exaggerated/botched Elizabeth Warren's native ancestry. Its as low as .09%

ModerationNow!

I identify as "non-Bidenary".
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
2,693
Reaction score
1,350
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The media are predictably omitting the most detrimental facts regarding Elizabeth Warren and her claims of being of native American descent. The worst part isn't how much she fudged and exaggerated her "native-american-ness", it's that she dishonestly claimed herself to be a "minority", in order to take advantage of benefits and acceptances reserved for REAL minorities! She listed herself as a minority on more than just the 1 Harvard faculty application.

Elizabeth Warren IS NOT a minority. She looks like a white lady, and when it comes to race, racism and discrimination, it's all about shallow superficial appearance, and she does NOT appear black, Latino, or American Indian! I'd remind everyone reading this, that if it had been a white republican who claimed minority status on major university and other applications, in order to receive special treatment, that Republican would've been shamed out of office long ago, as should Elizabeth Warren!

��Anyway, today after years of questions about her true racial or ethnic makeup, she released a combination DNA test/ campaign ad. Afterwards, the ultra progressive Boston globe came to her defense, with erroneous and inaccurate estimates of her native blood percentages. First its 1/32. Then 1/64. Later they come back with a 'correction', saying that, in fact the real percentage of native ancestry in Elizabeth Warren's DNA, is somewhere between 1/64 and 1/1,024th!

They also said that she 'likely' had an ancestor roughly 10 friggin generations ago. But the most telling statistic, is that in reality, Elizabeth Warren has LESS native American DNA than the average white European American!! In other words, she ain't no Indian! She is a "privileged white lady", who tried to dishonestly take benefits reserved specially for real minorities, by dishonestly claiming she's an Indian!

Scroll down and read Boston Globe's conveniently inaccurate math that kept changing:
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/10/15/boston-globe-botches-math-correction-on-elizabeth-warren-dna-test-story/
 
The media are predictably omitting the most detrimental facts regarding Elizabeth Warren and her claims of being of native American descent. The worst part isn't how much she fudged and exaggerated her "native-american-ness", it's that she dishonestly claimed herself to be a "minority", in order to take advantage of benefits and acceptances reserved for REAL minorities! She listed herself as a minority on more than just the 1 Harvard faculty application.

Elizabeth Warren IS NOT a minority. She looks like a white lady, and when it comes to race, racism and discrimination, it's all about shallow superficial appearance, and she does NOT appear black, Latino, or American Indian! I'd remind everyone reading this, that if it had been a white republican who claimed minority status on major university and other applications, in order to receive special treatment, that Republican would've been shamed out of office long ago, as should Elizabeth Warren!

��Anyway, today after years of questions about her true racial or ethnic makeup, she released a combination DNA test/ campaign ad. Afterwards, the ultra progressive Boston globe came to her defense, with erroneous and inaccurate estimates of her native blood percentages. First its 1/32. Then 1/64. Later they come back with a 'correction', saying that, in fact the real percentage of native ancestry in Elizabeth Warren's DNA, is somewhere between 1/64 and 1/1,024th!

They also said that she 'likely' had an ancestor roughly 10 friggin generations ago. But the most telling statistic, is that in reality, Elizabeth Warren has LESS native American DNA than the average white European American!! In other words, she ain't no Indian! She is a "privileged white lady", who tried to dishonestly take benefits reserved specially for real minorities, by dishonestly claiming she's an Indian!

Scroll down and read Boston Globe's conveniently inaccurate math that kept changing:
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/10/15/boston-globe-botches-math-correction-on-elizabeth-warren-dna-test-story/
Worst part is how the institutions are coming to her defense to protect her fraud. She kinda forced them into it but she put their bull rap on full public display

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
Worst part is how the institutions are coming to her defense to protect her fraud. She kinda forced them into it but she put their bull rap on full public display

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

Filed under "Facts dont matter to us".
 
...Which still is greater than zero.


"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

- Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.

http://amp.kjrh.com/2948480746/cher...-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results.html
 
"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

- Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.

http://amp.kjrh.com/2948480746/cher...-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results.html

On the other hand if the test shows no indian ancestry then none of this matters.....
 
"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

- Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.

http://amp.kjrh.com/2948480746/cher...-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results.html

AFAIK, Dr. Warren didn't attest to being a citizen of the Cherokee nation.
 
On the other hand if the test shows no indian ancestry then none of this matters.....

Unless Dr. Warren claimed to be citizen of the Cherokee Nation -- AFAIK, she has not so claimed -- it doesn't matter anyway.

Citizenship isn't determinable by DNA. Citizenship, in any nation, is a political association/matter, not a genetic one. DNA testing cannot identify such affiliations. A search of written public records sometimes can uncover such affiliations. (See post #3.)
 
The media are predictably omitting the most detrimental facts regarding Elizabeth Warren and her claims of being of native American descent. The worst part isn't how much she fudged and exaggerated her "native-american-ness", it's that she dishonestly claimed herself to be a "minority", in order to take advantage of benefits and acceptances reserved for REAL minorities! She listed herself as a minority on more than just the 1 Harvard faculty application.

Elizabeth Warren IS NOT a minority. She looks like a white lady, and when it comes to race, racism and discrimination, it's all about shallow superficial appearance, and she does NOT appear black, Latino, or American Indian! I'd remind everyone reading this, that if it had been a white republican who claimed minority status on major university and other applications, in order to receive special treatment, that Republican would've been shamed out of office long ago, as should Elizabeth Warren!

��Anyway, today after years of questions about her true racial or ethnic makeup, she released a combination DNA test/ campaign ad. Afterwards, the ultra progressive Boston globe came to her defense, with erroneous and inaccurate estimates of her native blood percentages. First its 1/32. Then 1/64. Later they come back with a 'correction', saying that, in fact the real percentage of native ancestry in Elizabeth Warren's DNA, is somewhere between 1/64 and 1/1,024th!

They also said that she 'likely' had an ancestor roughly 10 friggin generations ago. But the most telling statistic, is that in reality, Elizabeth Warren has LESS native American DNA than the average white European American!! In other words, she ain't no Indian! She is a "privileged white lady", who tried to dishonestly take benefits reserved specially for real minorities, by dishonestly claiming she's an Indian!

Scroll down and read Boston Globe's conveniently inaccurate math that kept changing:
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/10/15/boston-globe-botches-math-correction-on-elizabeth-warren-dna-test-story/

The media is quite talented a headlining falsehoods and offering answers to questions not posed. And, I should add, so are some of the media's critics.

The Boston Herald first broke the story that Warren was being promoted as a native American law professor at Harvard, as well as reported on her faux bafflement on how that could have happened. Then the Boston Globe went into "liberals circle the wagon" mode in 2012, publishing story and debunked story attempting to protect "the one" from the other reporters and blogs exposing her pretend identity as an Indian.

So naturally they are not going to headline "Warren is shown to be 99.7% white" undermining her claim of being an Indian. Nope, they are going to take a scrap of .3% and blow it up into the trope "Cherokee Warren has evidence of being a real Indian".

It's funny, but also sad, to see otherwise educated folks attempt such flimsy scams - in both the press and the halls of Harvard.
 
If you read the report it's worthless. For NA ancestry DNA, it was based on a mere 37 people who claimed to be pure NA. No one can know that. From that flaw, the result is that "likely" (what the hell is that in a DNA test???) 6 to 10 generations back a maternal ancestor had SOME NA DNA - meaning pushing the "likely" Native American DNA even more generations back.

Native Americans originated from Asia. Asians originated from the ME and those from Africa. Native Americans also are otherwise among the most blended of all peoples, including a couple hundred years of being literally raped. For the qualifiers of the study, likely everyone on earth "likely" has "some" DNA that would be declared Native American. Anyone who ever did the green bean - yellow bean math understands that. Hell, she probably has fish and plant DNA if you go deep enough with "likely" added to it.

What the DNA test proved is that she is white.

But maybe, possibly, sort of likely there might be some DNA originating back sometime a long, long time ago - or at least Native American similar DNA - unless not really.
 
Last edited:
This will not change one vote. Warren got some publicity and declarations of loyalty from Democrats in her defense, so potentially could help in the primary, but in nothing in the general election.

Obviously Warren does NOT believe voters are racists or she'd not have taken this route.

However, for how the MSM falsely portray this, it is unlikely that President Trump will call her Pocahontas again.
 
I bet she tried Ancestry.com and the result was "none." So she had to find the likely, maybe, sort of guy to go back to the origins of humanoid life.
 
Only here in Boston could the Globe still be printing their crap. Their readers dont care about facts they are cultists who hoark this stuff down like hogs on slop.
 
I bet she tried Ancestry.com and the result was "none." So she had to find the likely, maybe, sort of guy to go back to the origins of humanoid life.

Its ok its backfiring on her big time. Her hopes of having a shot at the presidency just evaporated. America isnt stupid enough to swallow her swill. Only her minions tolerate her blatant lies. Doesnt get to be a worse backfire than Native Americans telling her to shut about it. Shes literally the real life version of "The Jerk".
 
Pocahontas Warren just joined Spartacus Booker on the 'people who wont be president list'.
 
"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."

- Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.

http://amp.kjrh.com/2948480746/cher...-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results.html

Was Warren applying for tribal citizenship?

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
 
The media are predictably omitting the most detrimental facts regarding Elizabeth Warren and her claims of being of native American descent. The worst part isn't how much she fudged and exaggerated her "native-american-ness", it's that she dishonestly claimed herself to be a "minority", in order to take advantage of benefits and acceptances reserved for REAL minorities! She listed herself as a minority on more than just the 1 Harvard faculty application.

Elizabeth Warren IS NOT a minority. She looks like a white lady, and when it comes to race, racism and discrimination, it's all about shallow superficial appearance, and she does NOT appear black, Latino, or American Indian! I'd remind everyone reading this, that if it had been a white republican who claimed minority status on major university and other applications, in order to receive special treatment, that Republican would've been shamed out of office long ago, as should Elizabeth Warren!

��Anyway, today after years of questions about her true racial or ethnic makeup, she released a combination DNA test/ campaign ad. Afterwards, the ultra progressive Boston globe came to her defense, with erroneous and inaccurate estimates of her native blood percentages. First its 1/32. Then 1/64. Later they come back with a 'correction', saying that, in fact the real percentage of native ancestry in Elizabeth Warren's DNA, is somewhere between 1/64 and 1/1,024th!

They also said that she 'likely' had an ancestor roughly 10 friggin generations ago. But the most telling statistic, is that in reality, Elizabeth Warren has LESS native American DNA than the average white European American!! In other words, she ain't no Indian! She is a "privileged white lady", who tried to dishonestly take benefits reserved specially for real minorities, by dishonestly claiming she's an Indian!

Scroll down and read Boston Globe's conveniently inaccurate math that kept changing:
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/10/15/boston-globe-botches-math-correction-on-elizabeth-warren-dna-test-story/

IT could be, if the '10 generations' is right. It could be as much as 1/64th, which about 1.5%. They gave a range, and you are taking the extreme of the range. So, you are being a bit dishonest with your analysis.
 
Back
Top Bottom