• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

there is no such thing as "mainstream media"

You read something I did not write.

This is what I read:

"Quote Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
you are thinking of "main stream" as "biggest" or most consumed.

What "main stream media" is, is honest news. Researched news, Confirmed stories. No tabloid rumors or conspiracy theories.

Has little to do with size of consumption although in the past, when the USA was great, it was the main source for news. This is why were were a better educated country in the past. More aware country. Wingnut news is "alternate fact" "fake news" driven, tabloid/conspiracy theory news. It's not journalism. Dolts are unable to distinguish which adds to the dumbing down of the USA."

Was it not what you meant to post?
 
IMHO, mainstream media = big media outlets with large audiences. It’s mostly entertainment rather than news, but this thread seems to be about mainstream news media, even if the OP didn’t specify that. I would include ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, The NYT, The WaPo, USA Today, Time, Newsweek, and maybe some other periodicals. I might include NPR and PBS, but I’m not sure how big their audiences are.
 
This is what I read:

"Quote Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
you are thinking of "main stream" as "biggest" or most consumed.

What "main stream media" is, is honest news. Researched news, Confirmed stories. No tabloid rumors or conspiracy theories.

Has little to do with size of consumption although in the past, when the USA was great, it was the main source for news. This is why were were a better educated country in the past. More aware country. Wingnut news is "alternate fact" "fake news" driven, tabloid/conspiracy theory news. It's not journalism. Dolts are unable to distinguish which adds to the dumbing down of the USA."

Was it not what you meant to post?

What I wrote, which you quoted. Not what you are reading.
Hope this helps!
 
Instead of dwelling on that, why not tell your children and grandchildren about the 9+Trillion dollars of personal wealth created for the American people by the rise of the stock markets since the election?

Why are you Never Trumpers so consumed with sexual deviancies? It could give you a headache.

If it does, though, you better put some ice on that. You'll find it soothing.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/feb/20/clinton.usa

Better question for you Code......Trump recently stated "We fell in love.He writes me 'beautiful letters!'" <------ Donald J.Trump referring to brutal Communist dictator Kim Jung UN II...Are you,a Trump supporter, also 'in love' with Kim Jung UN II?....A simple YES or NO will suffice,as any other response will only be a deflection.So what is your answer to the question posed? YES or NO?
 
Mainstream media doesn’t mean liberal media. Fox News is considered mainstream media.

When I hear 'Fake News' from the president, regarding anything negative towards him, that's problematic, however, it's not like we don't have a problem with our mainstream media. The problem lies in those ads that play between segments. Whether it's Fox or MSNBC, they are beholden to their corporate donors, just like our god damned politicians.
 
What I wrote, which you quoted. Not what you are reading.
Hope this helps!

Not in the slightest.

I suspect that helping is not your intention.
 
Better question for you Code......Trump recently stated "We fell in love.He writes me 'beautiful letters!'" <------ Donald J.Trump referring to brutal Communist dictator Kim Jung UN II...Are you,a Trump supporter, also 'in love' with Kim Jung UN II?....A simple YES or NO will suffice,as any other response will only be a deflection.So what is your answer to the question posed? YES or NO?

No. I don't know the guy.

Why are you asking such a ridiculous and stupid question?
 
No. I don't know the guy.

Why are you asking such a ridiculous and stupid question?

The better question is why are you dodging the question posed ? No need to respond. The answer is obvious. btw,if you don't know the person,as you claim,how do you the person is a 'guy'?
 
Last edited:
The better question is why are you dodging the question posed ? No need to respond. The answer is obvious. btw,if you don't know the person,as you claim,how do you the person is a 'guy'?

Um...

Kim is referred to as a man in the media.

Are you now asserting that Kim is a woman?

Why are you raving?

By the by, you asked for a yes or no answer and I gave you a yes or no answer.
 
Um...

Kim is referred to as a man in the media.

Are you now asserting that Kim is a woman?

Why are you raving?

By the by, you asked for a yes or no answer and I gave you a yes or no answer.

Define raving and point out where that term applies to my post.
 
Define raving and point out where that term applies to my post.

Definition of raving (Entry 1 of 2)
: irrational, incoherent, wild, or extravagant utterance or declamation —usually used in plural

Quote Originally Posted by Logician Man View Post
The better question is why are you dodging the question posed ? No need to respond. The answer is obvious. btw,if you don't know the person,as you claim,how do you the person is a 'guy'?
 
Definition of raving (Entry 1 of 2)
: irrational, incoherent, wild, or extravagant utterance or declamation —usually used in plural

Quote Originally Posted by Logician Man View Post
The better question is why are you dodging the question posed ? No need to respond. The answer is obvious. btw,if you don't know the person,as you claim,how do you the person is a 'guy'?

Why are you so emotionally tender?
 
'FAKE NEWS' was term coined by Trump so he could hide behind Twitter and claim 'truth isn't truth' via rootin tootin Rudie.

Trump didn't coin the term, but he sho-nuff turned it around on the left. :lamo
 
Trump didn't coin the term, but he sho-nuff turned it around on the left. :lamo

Actually he only fooled the the righties like your self with it.The left knows exactly why he hides behind it,opting to use Twitter rather than face the American populace. :naughty
 
Why are you so emotionally tender?

You ask for things, I provide them and you then you take off on irrational and illogical tangents.

You may want to get this condition checked.
 
Trump didn't coin the term, but he sho-nuff turned it around on the left. :lamo

I never heard the "fake news" expression until Trump got into office. He coined it. This is how he rallies his base - telling them to only listen to the lies on FAUX News, which consistently gets the worst news reputability ratings of all the networks.
 
Actually he only fooled the the righties like your self with it.The left knows exactly why he hides behind it,opting to use Twitter rather than face the American populace. :naughty

Trump didn't "coin" the term. And BTW, Trump never said he grabbed *****, he said 'you can when you're a star'.
 
Trump didn't "coin" the term. And BTW, Trump never said he grabbed *****, he said 'you can when you're a star'.

Defend the misogynistic sexual deviant cheating bastard rat if you want.
 
I never heard the "fake news" expression until Trump got into office. He coined it. This is how he rallies his base - telling them to only listen to the lies on FAUX News, which consistently gets the worst news reputability ratings of all the networks.

Whether or not you heard it first from Trump is irrelevant.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.clarionledger.com/amp/864396002

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...aims-again-that-he-coined-the-term-fake-news/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/blogs-trending-42724320

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58d53c89e4b03692bea518ad

Trump didn't coin the term.
 
good.you're making 'progress.'. welcome to the left side of the aisle.

Correcting your misstatements puts me on the "left side of the isle" ??

Your total lack of defense concerning your statements is tells all you're spreading "fake news" (lies) or have no clue of that which you are apeaking.
 
"Main Stream Media" is a label from a few short years ago before the blossoming of the various media sources.

When I was in school, the idea of the "gatekeepers" was dwelled upon. Now the gatekeepers are less important. If I had the great ideas and the desire to do so, I could be Drudge. Maybe Breitbart or the Onion.

Sadly, I have few ideas and little desire. The "Gatekeepers", though, are not stopping me.

MSM really means "Old Time Media". Maybe obsolete media. "The Failing NYT" used to be the one and only. Now it's one of many.

The humorous part of the MSM is that they decry the MSM label, but probably detest the more accurate label: "Obsolete Media".

How long will the mind numbed robots tolerate getting half the story from the agenda driven fable tellers in the MSM?

A good post. To answer your question, the mind-numbed robots will tolerate that as long as their "smart phone" is working. They are well-conditioned and know nothing else.
 
Back
Top Bottom