• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Media Bias Chart 2017

calamity said:
incorrect post
Click to expand...
It’s possible to not assume that Trump is 100% honest. It’s also possible to not assume that the chart is 100% correct. It’s also possible to make neither of those assumptions.

It’s impossible for my last post to be incorrect, if the first three sentences of this post are correct.
 
Pedestrian said:
I see NPR as slightly left (don't need glasses) and also question most of the hyper partisan left. Seems the left wing bias is like breeze compared to any of its competition's tornadoes providing great sustenance to the investor class on the right.

I am an independent conservative and have never even heard of those at the bottom beginning with Forward Progressives

If the left wing media bias is supposed to be so bad for America as the right pulls that card everyday, why do we still have rampaging capitalism, profiteering, warmongering MIC buried in money and particularly when the media is owned by the very capitalist this bias is supposed to endanger ?
Click to expand...
If the media was unbiased, both parties would be further to the right.
 
mpg said:
It’s possible to not assume that Trump is 100% honest. It’s also possible to not assume that the chart is 100% correct. It’s also possible to make neither of those assumptions.

It’s impossible for my last post to be incorrect, if the first three sentences of this post are correct.
Click to expand...

The chart is way more correct that trump
 
calamity said:
In the days of Fake News vs Real News, this might help.

media-bias-chart_3.0_Hi-Res.jpg


Read it and weep if your fav newsie source is out there in SuckLand.
Click to expand...

I don't much care for abstract art.
 
calamity said:
In the days of Fake News vs Real News, this might help.

media-bias-chart_3.0_Hi-Res.jpg


Read it and weep if your fav newsie source is out there in SuckLand.
Click to expand...

I think the chart is fairly accurate. Although I think FAUX News should be even lower on the scale. They are the most inaccurate, manipulative, lying News source on the planet.
 
Media_Truth said:
I think the chart is fairly accurate. Although I think FAUX News should be even lower on the scale. They are the most inaccurate, manipulative, lying News source on the planet.
Click to expand...
Note that they are not judging the Faux News blabbermouths like Sean and the Friends. It's simply judging their news feeds. If they added Hannity, Carlson and the rest of the "opinion" talking heads, then it would be down there by Infowars.
 
As for PBS, how anyone can watch the Frontline series on Obama and still conclude it leans left is beyond me. But, meh...
 
Weekly Standard has been moving left, quite strongly.

Secondly, I don't know how I can buy into the major networks and NPR being neutral. Or Time, or *guffaw* CNN.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Weekly Standard has been moving left, quite strongly.

Secondly, I don't know how I can buy into the major networks and NPR being neutral. Or Time, or *guffaw* CNN.
Click to expand...

Actually WS is still Right; they just hate the abortion called the Trump administration.


When you think NPR, Time and CNN are too far Left, you've probably moved too far to the Right.

PBS is simply informative, perhaps a little too heady for the average Righty, but not political in lean at all.

Time is owned by Koch investment group

CNN is actually too soft on Trump in that they allow his liars to come on their station to spew propaganda unchecked.
 
calamity said:
Actually WS is still Right; they just hate the abortion called the Trump administration.


When you think NPR, Time and CNN are too far Left, you've probably moved too far to the Right.

PBS is simply informative, perhaps a little too heady for the average Righty, but not political in lean at all.

Time is owned by Koch investment group

CNN is actually too soft on Trump in that they allow his liars to come on their station to spew propaganda unchecked.
Click to expand...

You know what the difference between a never Trumper and a Democrat is? Me neither. Weekly Standard is in never Trump tertitory.

NPR and CNN never present a conservative viewpoint, it's hard to be unbiased when you only present one viewpoint. PBS does similar, omission isn't unniased.

CNN is soft on Trump? Wtf...

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
calamity said:
Actu
PBS is simply informative, perhaps a little too heady for the average Righty, but not political in lean at all.

ed.
Click to expand...


Well.....I think that says it all ,doesn't it,folks? Bubble induced cluenesses+ pompous arrogance=Today's Democrat.
maxresdefault.jpg

Ken Stern (Former CEO of NPR) joins Dave to discuss his new book “Republican Like Me: How I Left the Liberal Bubble and Learned to Love the Right,” defining what liberal means to him, intolerance of viewpoints and lack of diversity of thought on the left, his journey from left to right, his evolution on the gun control debate, and more. ***Subscribe: VladuzYT - YouTube...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0qyeFVf7bg
 
Pedestrian said:
I see NPR as slightly left (don't need glasses) and also question most of the hyper partisan left. Seems the left wing bias is like breeze compared to any of its competition's tornadoes providing great sustenance to the investor class on the right.

I am an independent conservative and have never even heard of those at the bottom beginning with Forward Progressives

If the left wing media bias is supposed to be so bad for America as the right pulls that card everyday, why do we still have rampaging capitalism, profiteering, warmongering MIC buried in money and particularly when the media is owned by the very capitalist this bias is supposed to endanger ?
Click to expand...

You've misdirected your comments. I don't believe I've ever intimated or declared that the media is evil or "bad for America" - I simply stated I found it laughable that anyone would consider PBS and Time, on the whole, to be right of center. If you understand the basis from which any media source begins in their coverage, you can judge the content and context accordingly. When a station, like PBS and CNN for that matter, always has a panel discussion consisting of 2 rabid liberals, a moderate leftist and a moderate central rightist and considers that balanced, you know from where their coming.
 
OpportunityCost said:
You know what the difference between a never Trumper and a Democrat is? Me neither. Weekly Standard is in never Trump tertitory.

NPR and CNN never present a conservative viewpoint, it's hard to be unbiased when you only present one viewpoint. PBS does similar, omission isn't unniased.

CNN is soft on Trump? Wtf...

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yes, CNN is soft on Trump. So is MSNBC. Case in point - if the Stormy Daniels hush money payment, and the McDougall Affair payoff to the National Enquirer were turned around - in other words - perpetuated by a Democrat. FOX News would play that story over and over and over throughout the presidential term. FAUX found it newsworthy to report that Obama's dad was an alcoholic, and report it over and over and over, even though Obama only met his dad once in his life. Capiche? - soft towards Trump...
 
calamity said:
In the days of Fake News vs Real News, this might help.

media-bias-chart_3.0_Hi-Res.jpg


Read it and weep if your fav newsie source is out there in SuckLand.
Click to expand...

Would you provide a link to the methodology used to prepare the chart shown in the OP, please.....
 
Media_Truth said:
Yes, CNN is soft on Trump. So is MSNBC. Case in point - if the Stormy Daniels hush money payment, and the McDougall Affair payoff to the National Enquirer were turned around - in other words - perpetuated by a Democrat. FOX News would play that story over and over and over throughout the presidential term. FAUX found it newsworthy to report that Obama's dad was an alcoholic, and report it over and over and over, even though Obama only met his dad once in his life. Capiche? - soft towards Trump...
Click to expand...

Hypothetical assumption based on your biases. Confirmed, you're wrong.
 
calamity said:
In the days of Fake News vs Real News, this might help.

media-bias-chart_3.0_Hi-Res.jpg


Read it and weep if your fav newsie source is out there in SuckLand.
Click to expand...

Personally I have never believed anything coming from the red box, not on either side. I don't believe occupy democrats any better than I believe infowars.

I think infowars needs to even have it's own category for all the wrong things you mentioned but combined with conspiracy theories which make Infowars the worst on that list by far IMO.
 
Fnc=fox news channel=fake news channel
 
calamity said:
In the days of Fake News vs Real News, this might help.

media-bias-chart_3.0_Hi-Res.jpg


Read it and weep if your fav newsie source is out there in SuckLand.
Click to expand...

How well has this chart been corrected for its own bias?
 
Can somebody point out what says that the middle two blocks are anything other than "MAINSTREAM-minimal partisan biased"

all these claims about the right of center are cracking me up, nothing like inventing labeling thats not there. Doesn't mean I agree with the chart 100% just pointing out im not going to make stuff up LMAO
 
This is one i modded a while ago...now of course it didnt move everythign on here because i dont know all these sources but for the most part i think its good


My News.jpg
 
OpportunityCost said:
You know what the difference between a never Trumper and a Democrat is? Me neither. Weekly Standard is in never Trump tertitory.

NPR and CNN never present a conservative viewpoint, it's hard to be unbiased when you only present one viewpoint. PBS does similar, omission isn't unniased.

CNN is soft on Trump? Wtf...

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

What is a "conservative" view point?
why should ANY news present one? conservative or liberal etc etc

Id rather news just be news and ZERO right/left "viewpoints"
 
AGENT J said:
What is a "conservative" view point?
why should ANY news present one? conservative or liberal etc etc

Id rather news just be news and ZERO right/left "viewpoints"
Click to expand...
Pros and cons of policy decisions or pending legislation have proponents on the left and right.

Leans are often determined by what they present and how they do so. Pretending they don't exist or shouldn't is silly. They do and will continue to do so.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
OpportunityCost said:
1.)Pros and cons of policy decisions or pending legislation have proponents on the left and right.
2.)Leans are often determined by what they present and how they do so. Pretending they don't exist or shouldn't is silly. They do and will continue to do so.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

1.)Oh so i see your confusion, you are talking TALK shows and pundit shows and OPINION pieces not NEWS shows
2.) who pretended they didnt exist? Making stuff up is even more silly

Like I said NEWS shouldn't have leans.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Hypothetical assumption based on your biases. Confirmed, you're wrong.
Click to expand...

If I had a $1000 for every time FAUX News or FAUX commentators mentioned Obama's father, I'd be a multi-millionaire. FAUX News is not an objective source. Nothing but lies and hidden agendas by the billionaires that control it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom