• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hannity post-Rudy interview

haymarket said:
Very well stated. Thank you for the link.

What Hannity and most on the far right (and I include Republican members of Congress and the FOX media) who enable Trump are really saying is this: okay - Trump may not always tell the truth...... Trump might outright lie at times .... the people that work for Trump might outright lie at times ...... maybe they did conspire with the Russians ...... maybe they did violate some laws in doing that ...... maybe they did buy off women to keep them quiet after Trump had sex with them ..... maybe he made election promises he cannot make good on..... and maybe he even is disgracing the office of the President with his tweets and behavior and comments....

BUT

Trump had to do this because of HILLARY CLINTON!!!!!!!!!!!!

Clinton made him do it!!!!!!!!!

You see folks, in the eyes of the right wing, Clinton is the Great SATAN who must be opposed by any means necessary and Trump only did what he had to do in order to defeat the Great SATAN and so its okay in their eyes.

That is what all this comes down to so in the end, nothing that Mueller or any court reveals about the crimes of Trump and his people will matter an iota to any of the Trumpkins.
Click to expand...

Since you brought her up, she too blames everyone but herself.
However, this isn't about Hillary but clowns who have another clown's ear? The clowns on other networks had the previous administration's ear. Now it is this one's turn. Some like it, some don't.
Hannity, Tucker...I am surprised they are still on the air, but alas, I don't have to tune in. It is all good. They are entitled to their opinion, whether we like it or not.
 
cpwill said:
Eh, I think you'd have a few more than that capable of passing, especially once it became the pathway to voting. But if it means we get rid of large numbers of those who had no idea what they were doing.... I'm generally okay with that.
Click to expand...

I'm more on the side of term limits to get rid of these clownish politicians. Their number one concern, above all, especially in the House, is to get reelected. Serving the people is down on the list.
 
Anthony60 said:
Don't be to anxious, where did you get this list, Media Matters? "Denies climate change"? That makes you crazy? Plus, it's a false statement. He acknowledges that the climate is always changing. Oh, and good ol'e boy Mitch is as RINO as you can be. I could go on, but since there is no context at all, it really doesn't mean much. I know the context of a lot of them, which is why I know that this list is meaningless.
Click to expand...

I suspect that you can't go on, and that's why your "rebuttal" (such as it is) is so meager.
 
Anthony60 said:
You say that, but make no rebuttal to what I posted. Classic.
Click to expand...

You are projecting.
When you post something of value, I will address it.

Until then... have a nice day!
 
RickJames3000 said:
You are projecting.
When you post something of value, I will address it.

Until then... have a nice day!
Click to expand...

And now, the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears, yelling and running away. No, you won't address it. Not a big deal, you do't have to, no one is forcing you. Buh-bye, I'll be here.
 
Anthony60 said:
And now, the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears, yelling and running away. No, you won't address it. Not a big deal, you do't have to, no one is forcing you. Buh-bye, I'll be here.
Click to expand...

LOL@ you thinking you addressed any point at all.

You "answered" a 13-point list of certifiable Levin madness by saying "McConnell is as RINO as can be!"; and with the inanity, "climate is always changing".

Ha! If you know the context of any of these insane ramblings, then why don't you post about it...
instead of boasting about your secret "knowledge",
in an attempt to deflect?

(HINT: You got nothing!)
 
tres borrachos said:
I set my Tivo and watched his show when I got home last night from a soccer game. For anyone who missed it, you need to watch it.



Okay, here are many things that concern me about this clown.

He has the President's ear, and apparently he is helping Trump do his job. He has loyal fans (who are also citizens of Trump Fan Nation) who watch and listen to this crap and actually go through their days thinking this is what's really going on.

Hannity was raging constantly about how the "liberal media" focused on a 30 second clip (about the payment) and not about all of the other massive revelations Rudy made, including about - you guessed it - Hillary! If anyone saw the show, or feels like watching that clip, please let me know what big revelations did Rudy make about Hillary? About Mueller? About anything - other than telling the world that the President lied?

And is it just me or does he always have the same useless guests - Sebastian Gorka (that man is nuts), Joe Digenova (that man is nuts), Sara Carter (get your head out of Trump's lap, Sara), and Mark Levin, who I used to listen to in my car on Sirius radio and who is now even more pathetic than Hannity?

This is Trump Fan Nation, and it's the scariest place in the world these days.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I don't get the people that watch Hannity's clearly biased nonsense, and believe it. Rudy made a big slip up, and we now know Trump knew all about this. Deflecting to Hillary Clinton does not change the fact that Rudy confirmed Trump lied.
 
tres borrachos said:
...

This is Trump Fan Nation, and it's the scariest place in the world these days.
Click to expand...

Sean Banality: "... they are visibly yawning over three of our fellow Americans who were imprisoned by Kim Jong Un ... "

Can you, or any American, Mr Banality, say, spell or defend Guantanamo or any of the other US Black Hole torture chambers around the world?

How about 'hypocrisy', do you have any idea of the meaning of the word?
 
TheGoverness said:
Yeah, I don't get the people that watch Hannity's clearly biased nonsense, and believe it. Rudy made a big slip up, and we now know Trump knew all about this. Deflecting to Hillary Clinton does not change the fact that Rudy confirmed Trump lied.
Click to expand...

I personally support Trump (not on everything mind you, but I support him on a lot of things) but Hannity does need to stop jacking Trump's Weiner off every time, it gets kind of annoying
 
Anthony60 said:
I don't mind if that's your opinion, but then you need to acknowledge that those on the other side are at least as clownish, if you want any credibility at all. And you need to back it up.
Click to expand...

Although the Democrat side is awful too, you only have to consider what a well known to everyone serial liar Trump is. Not to mention a sexual predator and his other "attributes".

Can't you see the irony, the desperation, the hypocrisy, the ... in, of all people, Sean Banality defending Trump/right wing supporters of Trump like he does?

Now if Mr Banality were to start his rants with,

"Okay, I know that I have long severely criticized Clintons, liberals, ... for things that Trump and my right wing excel at, I just want you all to know that I am a flaming hypocrite, liar, defender of sexual predators, maybe even one myself, hey, it's not out of the question, then you all know where I am coming from."
 
Last edited:
RickJames3000 said:
LOL@ you thinking you addressed any point at all.

You "answered" a 13-point list of certifiable...
Click to expand...
Uh, certifiable? Says who? Sorry, not flyin'. Doesn't jive with what I've heard.

...Levin madness by saying "McConnell is as RINO as can be!"; and with the inanity, "climate is always changing".
Click to expand...
Yet, you choose not to refute. Go ahead, make my day.
Ha! If you know the context of any of these insane ramblings, then why don't you post about it...
instead of boasting about your secret "knowledge",
in an attempt to deflect?

(HINT: You got nothing!)
Click to expand...
You are the one that called him "crazy", it's on you. It's not on me to prove he isn't.
As I have listen to most of those shows, and they are all available for anyone to hear, the list that you posted is, at best, silly and inaccurate.

We could have an entire thread devoted to why McConnel is a RINO, it's a matter of opinion. He's certainly no conservative.

I could call any number of leftist kooks crazy, but there is a difference between sounding crazy, having other motives, and doing it for attention, and being actually crazy. You chose to go down that actually crazy road, but can't back it up. I suspect you really meant to go with one of the others.
 
Anthony60 said:
You start right out calling him a clown. Right away we know it's not going to be a very objective post. Then you go on with putting down everyone you mention. And you can't believe Hillary was mentioned! Sorry, but I'm disappointed.
Click to expand...

He is a clown, but it may not look that way through hack-colored glasses.
 
camlok said:
Although the Democrat side is awful too, you only have to consider what a well known to everyone serial liar Trump is. Not to mention a sexual predator and his other "attributes".

Can't you see the irony, the desperation, the hypocrisy, the ... in, of all people, Sean Banality defending Trump/right wing supporters of Trump like he does?

Now if Mr Banality were to start his rants with,

"Okay, I know that I have long severely criticized Clintons, liberals, ... for things that Trump and my right wing excel at, I just want you all to know that I am a flaming hypocrite, liar, defender of sexual predators, maybe even one myself, hey, it's not out of the question, then you all know where I am coming from."
Click to expand...

Sorry, I'm not getting the "Banality" thing at all. The sexual predator stuff has no evidence to support it, so that's nothing. I mean, you expect me to take your post seriously? I don't know if there is anything in i that is true.
 
Anthony60 said:
Uh, certifiable? Says who? Sorry, not flyin'. Doesn't jive with what I've heard.


Yet, you choose not to refute. Go ahead, make my day.
You are the one that called him "crazy", it's on you. It's not on me to prove he isn't.
As I have listen to most of those shows, and they are all available for anyone to hear, the list that you posted is, at best, silly and inaccurate.

We could have an entire thread devoted to why McConnel is a RINO, it's a matter of opinion. He's certainly no conservative.

I could call any number of leftist kooks crazy, but there is a difference between sounding crazy, having other motives, and doing it for attention, and being actually crazy. You chose to go down that actually crazy road, but can't back it up. I suspect you really meant to go with one of the others.
Click to expand...

What an utter load of crap. lol
You asked for a list of reasons why Levin is crazy, and I provided one.

I can't help it if you lack the facilities to defend your man.
 
Anthony60 said:
Sorry, I'm not getting the "Banality" thing at all.
Click to expand...

You don't understand the word banal/banality? Perhaps this might be of some assistance

M-W: Definition of banal
: lacking originality, freshness, or novelty : trite

M-W: Definition of banality
plural banalities
1 : something that lacks originality, freshness, or novelty : something banal : commonplace
2 : the quality or state of lacking new or interesting qualities : the quality or state of being banal


The sexual predator stuff has no evidence to support it, so that's nothing.
Click to expand...

For Trump or Sean? Why are you being so coy/evasive? Do you need definitions for those too?


I mean, you expect me to take your post seriously? I don't know if there is anything in i that is true.
Click to expand...

Now that you understand the vocabulary what do you think?
 
Lovebug said:
Since you brought her up, she too blames everyone but herself.
However, this isn't about Hillary but clowns who have another clown's ear? The clowns on other networks had the previous administration's ear. Now it is this one's turn. Some like it, some don't.
Hannity, Tucker...I am surprised they are still on the air, but alas, I don't have to tune in. It is all good. They are entitled to their opinion, whether we like it or not.
Click to expand...

I was merely explaining the overreaching imperative as to why people on the right are willing to give Trump both support and a pass on all that he does while those not on the right are shaking their heads in complete disbelief at his ongoing destruction of the office he was entrusted with.
 
Anthony60 said:
I'm more on the side of term limits to get rid of these clownish politicians.
Click to expand...

Generally, it's the new flash-in-the-pan types I find most likely to be clownish; term limits aren't likely to help.

Their number one concern, above all, especially in the House, is to get reelected. Serving the people is down on the list.
Click to expand...

Interesting you see a natural split between those two - being reelected every two years keeps the House most responsive to the electorate. Which they should be - though it does introduce clownishness.
 
RickJames3000 said:
What an utter load of crap. lol
You asked for a list of reasons why Levin is crazy, and I provided one.

I can't help it if you lack the facilities to defend your man.
Click to expand...

No, you provided a bunch of one liners with no context. No reasoning whatsoever. Nothing at all to defend, since your list was nothing.
 
camlok said:
You don't understand the word banal/banality? Perhaps this might be of some assistance

M-W: Definition of banal
: lacking originality, freshness, or novelty : trite

M-W: Definition of banality
plural banalities
1 : something that lacks originality, freshness, or novelty : something banal : commonplace
2 : the quality or state of lacking new or interesting qualities : the quality or state of being banal
Click to expand...

Oh, now I get it. Like your post.
 
Anthony60 said:
No, you provided a bunch of one liners with no context. No reasoning whatsoever. Nothing at all to defend, since your list was nothing.
Click to expand...

You asked why someone would consider Levin crazy, and I responded with a list of nutty crap he's said over the years.
Not sure why you are crying about the answers.

In fact I was the only one who answered your question. Now I know why no one else bothered to take your question seriously enough to respond to it.
 
tres borrachos said:
I set my Tivo and watched his show when I got home last night from a soccer game. For anyone who missed it, you need to watch it.



Okay, here are many things that concern me about this clown.

He has the President's ear, and apparently he is helping Trump do his job. He has loyal fans (who are also citizens of Trump Fan Nation) who watch and listen to this crap and actually go through their days thinking this is what's really going on.

Hannity was raging constantly about how the "liberal media" focused on a 30 second clip (about the payment) and not about all of the other massive revelations Rudy made, including about - you guessed it - Hillary! If anyone saw the show, or feels like watching that clip, please let me know what big revelations did Rudy make about Hillary? About Mueller? About anything - other than telling the world that the President lied?

And is it just me or does he always have the same useless guests - Sebastian Gorka (that man is nuts), Joe Digenova (that man is nuts), Sara Carter (get your head out of Trump's lap, Sara), and Mark Levin, who I used to listen to in my car on Sirius radio and who is now even more pathetic than Hannity?

This is Trump Fan Nation, and it's the scariest place in the world these days.
Click to expand...


Trumpacrocy supporters are begging for state ran press.
 
RickJames3000 said:
You asked why someone would consider Levin crazy, and I responded with a list of nutty crap he's said over the years.
Not sure why you are crying about the answers.

In fact I was the only one who answered your question. Now I know why no one else bothered to take your question seriously enough to respond to it.
Click to expand...

It's just a joke that you think that list shows him to be crazy. Anyone that thinks that obviously hasn't listened to him very much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom