• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN Debate VS Hannity's Lawyer

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Which is worse? Hannity regularly eating and hanging out with Trump and his Lawyer before, during and after the election or a contributor handing questions to a candidate during a debate on CNN?
 
Are you talking about the Donna Brazile thing?

What does that possibly have to do with Trump, Hannity and lunch? Come to think of it, why are you even talking about Trump, Hannity and lunch?
 
Are you talking about the Donna Brazile thing?

What does that possibly have to do with Trump, Hannity and lunch? Come to think of it, why are you even talking about Trump, Hannity and lunch?

NeverTrumpGOP must like apples and oranges.
 
Are you talking about the Donna Brazile thing?

What does that possibly have to do with Trump, Hannity and lunch? Come to think of it, why are you even talking about Trump, Hannity and lunch?

You seemed to make a big deal out of CNN colluding with her. Why isn't it a big deal that Hannity colluded with Trump/Cohen?
 
You seemed to make a big deal out of CNN colluding with her. Why isn't it a big deal that Hannity colluded with Trump/Cohen?

"Colluded"? What the dickens are you talking about?

Cohen may or may not have had Hannity as a client for something but I have no idea where you're coming up with collusion or conspiracy or whatever.
 
Which is worse? Hannity regularly eating and hanging out with Trump and his Lawyer before, during and after the election or a contributor handing questions to a candidate during a debate on CNN?

Both speak to credibility. The difference is, CNN had some credibility to lose. Hannity never had any credibility to begin with.
 
"Colluded"? What the dickens are you talking about?

Cohen may or may not have had Hannity as a client for something but I have no idea where you're coming up with collusion or conspiracy or whatever.

I sort of agree. Can anyone explain the significance of Hannity having Cohen as an attorney, other than his lack of ethics as a journalist/commentator? I think I may have missed something.
 
Both speak to credibility. The difference is, CNN had some credibility to lose. Hannity never had any credibility to begin with.

Yeah, this.

CNN had credibility. Nobody with half a brain ever took Hannity seriously. That's why he's the President's left brain. The President is lacking half a brain and Hannity fills the void.
 
I sort of agree. Can anyone explain the significance of Hannity having Cohen as an attorney, other than his lack of ethics as a journalist/commentator? I think I may have missed something.

I don't think it's anything other than the lack of ethics. Hannity should have disclosed that fact, but since he has no ethics, he didn't.

I don't suspect there is anything illegal in Hannity's association with Trump. But this is the "Bias in the Media" section, and we all know if this was a CNN commentator, raging every night about how mean the Special Counsel is to go after President Obama's personal lawyer, and was having dinner with and conversations with President Obama, and he was also soliciting legal advice from President Obama's lawyer and not disclosing it, the citizens of Trump Fan Nation would have started a half dozen threads in this very section whining about the media protecting Obama. Granted, that's a whataboutism, but even taking out the whataboutism, this is media bias to the greatest degree imaginable.
 
Yeah, this.

CNN had credibility. Nobody with half a brain ever took Hannity seriously. That's why he's the President's left brain. The President is lacking half a brain and Hannity fills the void.

Hannity is the worst of worst at FOX. I remember when the Rodney King news was active, he flashed to a group of protesting blacks - very hard to understand, obviously uneducated, etc. Switched over to CNN, and they were interviewing an articulate black, female lawyer.
 
I don't think it's anything other than the lack of ethics. Hannity should have disclosed that fact, but since he has no ethics, he didn't.

I don't suspect there is anything illegal in Hannity's association with Trump. But this is the "Bias in the Media" section, and we all know if this was a CNN commentator, raging every night about how mean the Special Counsel is to go after President Obama's personal lawyer, and was having dinner with and conversations with President Obama, and he was also soliciting legal advice from President Obama's lawyer and not disclosing it, the citizens of Trump Fan Nation would have started a half dozen threads in this very section whining about the media protecting Obama. Granted, that's a whataboutism, but even taking out the whataboutism, this is media bias to the greatest degree imaginable.

Impeachment, impeachment, Trump has a friend, impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom