• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Trump.news"

gdgyva said:
But you will NEVER get him in front of a grand jury while he is president
Click to expand...


At some point, Mueller will subpoena, and Trump's lawyers will probably say no, and after the issue is dragged in front of SCOTUS, he will finally forced to testify before the FBI, or face threat of grand jury.

More likely direct questioning by FBI with lawyer present. It's coming, it's just a matter of time.
 
OscarLevant said:
At some point, Mueller will subpoena, and Trump's lawyers will probably say no, and after the issue is dragged in front of SCOTUS, he will finally forced to testify before the FBI, or face threat of grand jury.

More likely direct questioning by FBI with lawyer present. It's coming, it's just a matter of time.
Click to expand...

and he will tell the grand jury to go pound sand....

he wont testify where he will be faced with the prospect of process charges....

Mueller may make his case without it....but there wont be clintonesque type charges
 
gdgyva said:
and he will tell the grand jury to go pound sand....
Click to expand...


Really? If he did, I should think that would pretty much seal an air tight indictment for obstruction of justice, which, of course,
would be challenged by his lawyers, and it would go to SCOTUS, and there is one repub judge on that bench that is liberal
enough to abide by "no man is above the law", if not all of them. I doubt even Gorsuch would defy that basic concept
in American jurisprudence, but I'm not a lawyer, so, I defer to any lawyer in the peanut gallery who knows about these things.
 
OscarLevant said:
Really? If he did, I should think that would pretty much seal an air tight indictment for obstruction of justice, which, of course,
would be challenged by his lawyers, and it would go to SCOTUS, and there is one repub judge on that bench that is liberal
enough to abide by "no man is above the law", if not all of them. I doubt even Gorsuch would defy that basic concept
in American jurisprudence, but I'm not a lawyer, so, I defer to any lawyer in the peanut gallery who knows about these things.
Click to expand...

As I have posted on other threads, you CANT force a man to testify against himself.....especially when that man is the president

He has a lot of power, including but not limited to executive powers which can allow him ignore subpoenas

Because of that, it is my opinion, and will be until he actually proves me wrong, that he will NEVER testify in a setting where a process charge could be forthcoming

Mueller could still indict him, but he will have to do so without Trump helping him
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom