- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
I am so happy to be seeing this. This type of viral crap website whether they be conservative or liberal, suck and are annoying for anyone who has an attention span longer than five seconds. They hurt everything that the internet was built and intended for.
Some graphs here: https://theoutline.com/post/3599/co...by-facebook-news-feed-change?zd=2&zi=d3yobbtj
The sites that used Facebook the most:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathle...tes-that-stand-to-lose-the-most/#497f28d234ec
This should be applauded, but for some reason I think it will be mostly mocked here. Let's see.
https://mediapost.com/publications/...ative-site-rareus-to-shutter-couldnt-sur.htmlAccording to Axios, which first reported the news, the demise of Rare.us is another example of a viral site built on Facebook’s traffic that could not survive the platform’s algorithm change to its News Feed, now prioritizing posts from friends and family over publisher content.
Some graphs here: https://theoutline.com/post/3599/co...by-facebook-news-feed-change?zd=2&zi=d3yobbtj
The sites that used Facebook the most:
1. Topix.com (with 48.2% over total traffic coming from social)
2. Vice.com (48.1%)
3. Standardnews.com (44.2%)
4. Independent.co.uk (43.7%)
5. Rawstory.com (38.2%)
6. Buzzfeed.com (38.0%)
7. Thehill.com (33.7%)
8. Mashable.com (28.4%)
9. Newyorker.com (26.6%)
10. Bustle.com (26.0%)
11. Slate.com (23.2%)
12. Theatlantic.com (23.1%)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathle...tes-that-stand-to-lose-the-most/#497f28d234ec
This should be applauded, but for some reason I think it will be mostly mocked here. Let's see.