• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's morning tweets perfectly align with Fox & Friends

NeverTrump

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Fox News is a disgrace to journalism. Popped into a McDonalds the other day where the TV stays on Fox News, and with all the developments lately, all they could focus on was how the FBI dropped the ball on the Florida shooter. Over and over and over. Nothing on Trump that is negative as usual.
 
Last edited:
Excellent early morning work Mr. President. That will keep all the headless yet still mouthing news bandits busy the rest of the day so they don't have to do any real work.

Huff n puff, Trump bad... no no no we over here say Trump badder...well from our viewpoint, we at this network say Trump is the worser of all ( the fake news competition that CNN gold medals in consistently).
 
President Trump had a busy Tuesday morning on Twitter, with seven tweets before 9am, touching on topics from the Russia investigation to Pennsylvania's new congressional district map.
Click to expand...

Rather than Trump, the talking heads on Fox & Friends formulate WH/US policy. The Oval Office is actually Fox's Studio F in New York City.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Excellent early morning work Mr. President. That will keep all the headless yet still mouthing news bandits busy the rest of the day so they don't have to do any real work.

Huff n puff, Trump bad... no no no we over here say Trump badder...well from our viewpoint, we at this network say Trump is the worser of all ( the fake news competition that CNN gold medals in consistently).
Click to expand...

Wow. What is it like to have to defend our 9 year old president? That must really suck.
 
EnigmaO01 said:
Fox News is a disgrace to journalism. Popped into a McDonalds the other day where the TV stays on Fox News, and with all the developments lately, all they could focus on was how the FBI dropped the ball on the Florida shooter. Over and over and over. Nothing on Trump that is negative as usual.
Click to expand...
LOL!! A few years ago a 'conservative' poster said he was in the doctor's office that morning and the TV was on Fox. He said 'I knew right then and there what the topic for all the cons was to be for the day - darned if I wasn't right'. :lamo
 
Top Cat said:
Wow. What is it like to have to defend our 9 year old president? That must really suck.
Click to expand...

After the socialist wrecking ball, we are pretty easy to please, I guess. Its like my father's saying about the guy they found hitting himself on the head with a ball peen hammer. Asked why he was doing so, he said, " Cause it feels so good when I stop."
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
After the socialist wrecking ball, we are pretty easy to please, I guess. Its like my father's saying about the guy they found hitting himself on the head with a ball peen hammer. Asked why he was doing so, he said, " Cause it feels so good when I stop."
Click to expand...

That describes the level of intellect of the average Trumper rather well.
 
Top Cat said:
That describes the level of intellect of the average Trumper rather well.
Click to expand...

Well, the ball peen hammer was Barrack Obama. It now feels so good cause he has been stopped. As to Trump, suck it up, we did for 8 long miserable years under slender, sly but stupid's administration
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Well, the ball peen hammer was Barrack Obama. It now feels so good cause he has been stopped. As to Trump, suck it up, we did for 8 long miserable years under slender, sly but stupid's administration
Click to expand...

Trump isn't going to last. Especially after the midterm bloodbath.
 
BWG said:
LOL!! A few years ago a 'conservative' poster said he was in the doctor's office that morning and the TV was on Fox. He said 'I knew right then and there what the topic for all the cons was to be for the day - darned if I wasn't right'. :lamo
Click to expand...

It has been my experience in doctor's waiting areas and other businesses that have customer lounge/waiting area, the office managers are loathe to have any political news or news of any sort on their televisions. There have been reports of arguments and fights. Look for soothing music and abstract art and reruns of Andy Griffith, :mrgreen:
 
BWG said:
LOL!! A few years ago a 'conservative' poster said he was in the doctor's office that morning and the TV was on Fox. He said 'I knew right then and there what the topic for all the cons was to be for the day - darned if I wasn't right'. :lamo
Click to expand...

Fox is very predictable and favorable to Trump. That's where he gets his talking points from. At least he did today and even admitted it in a tweet. "Fox and Friends."
 
EnigmaO01 said:
Fox is very predictable and favorable to Trump. That's where he gets his talking points from. At least he did today and even admitted it in a tweet. "Fox and Friends."
Click to expand...

It isn't the first time. He's done it in the past.

Scary. Sad. Disheartening.
 
Top Cat said:
Trump isn't going to last. Especially after the midterm bloodbath.
Click to expand...

The House will move to a Democrat majority in Jan 2019.

Donald Trump will be re-elected in 2020.

Take it to the bank.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Did you predict, by chance, his election, an electoral landslide? I did...and I think you are wrong.
Click to expand...

Wait. To clarify, are you calling Trump's election an "electoral landslide?"
 
Deuce said:
Wait. To clarify, are you calling Trump's election an "electoral landslide?"
Click to expand...

Yes, I would considered a 30 to twenty states electoral college victory a landslide. Everyone is free to interpret how they please but when one gains half more than the other side won in its totality...
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Yes, I would considered a 30 to twenty states electoral college victory a landslide. Everyone is free to interpret how they please but when one gains half more than the other side won in its totality...
Click to expand...

The electoral college is not number of states, it's number of electoral votes. Which, incidentally, is actually how the presidency is decided. Even with your metric, that's 60% to 40%. "Half more."

Trump was about bottom 20% in electoral vote victory margins. Placed #46 out of 58, to be exact. So, if the electoral college is your indicator and you are calling this a "landslide," that means 80% of presidential elections are decided in a "landslide." Trump got 56.9% of the electoral vote. "Landslide."

In popular vote, is margin was 3rd to last, 47 out of 49. (popular vote counts weren't reported in early elections) President Hayes was the only comparable election with a popular vote loss that did worse than Trump, in slot #48: -3% margin to Trump's -2.1%. John Quincy Adams was a weird one because there were three major candidates, a -10% margin.
 
Last edited:
Deuce said:
The electoral college is not number of states, it's number of electoral votes. Which, incidentally, is actually how the presidency is decided. Even with your metric, that's 60% to 40%. "Half more."

Trump was about bottom 20% in electoral vote victory margins. Placed #46 out of 58, to be exact. So, if the electoral college is your indicator and you are calling this a "landslide," that means 80% of presidential elections are decided in a "landslide."

In popular vote, is margin was 3rd to last, 47 out of 49. (popular vote counts weren't reported in early elections)
Click to expand...
Yeah? Nice swing, too bad you didnt quite connect.

See, you framed it how your slant would fit. Landslides are not determined by how many other landslides have occurred, nor how large the larger margin. A huuuuge landslide and a regular landslide are both still landslides. Oh, the electoral college is done by states alright, that is what its all about.

Nobody in their right political mind ever need even start flatulating about pop votes. Yanno?
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Yeah? Nice swing, too bad you didnt quite connect.

See, you framed it how your slant would fit. Landslides are not determined by how many other landslides have occurred, nor how large the larger margin. A huuuuge landslide and a regular landslide are both still landslides. Oh, the electoral college is done by states alright, that is what its all about.

Nobody in their right political mind ever need even start flatulating about pop votes. Yanno?
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone but Trump fans have ever referred to 56.9% margin as a "landslide" before. But hey, you do you, man.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Yes I do, really I do. Plus... You have yet to prove right nor me wrong, so you idle in the worst of both worlds.
Click to expand...

Prove... what, exactly? I've given the facts.

I can't disprove your personal definition of "landslide" because it's arbitrary and subjective. Your claim is that 80% of elections are at least "landslide" level and I personally think that makes the term meaningless.

You're clearly defining the term retroactively. Trump said it was a landslide, so you had to backfill the definition to make him right. You should take some personal time to reflect on exactly why it is you're doing that. For example, did you actually use the term "landslide" for either of Obama's victories?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom